UP Government’s Key Directions For Invoking Gangster
📌 What is the Gangster Act?
The Gangster Act refers to the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 (UP Gangsters Act). It is a stringent law aimed at curbing organized crime and activities of habitual criminals, such as gangsters and anti-social elements, by providing special powers for investigation, detention, and prosecution.
📝 UP Government’s Key Directions for Invoking the Gangster Act
The UP government has issued detailed directions and guidelines for police and prosecuting authorities before invoking the Gangster Act provisions against an accused. These directions are designed to ensure:
1. Strict Scrutiny Before Invocation
The Gangster Act should be invoked only against hardened criminals and habitual offenders engaged in serious crimes like murder, extortion, kidnapping, robbery, organized crime, etc.
The police must conduct a thorough preliminary inquiry and collect prima facie evidence before invoking the Act.
The invocation should not be made merely to increase punishment or for tactical advantages in minor offenses.
2. Detailed Report and Approval
Before registering an FIR or initiating proceedings under the Gangster Act, the concerned police officer must prepare a detailed report justifying the invocation.
The report should highlight the criminal history, previous convictions, modus operandi, and gravity of crimes committed by the accused.
Prior approval from senior police officers or the District Magistrate (DM) is mandatory to proceed.
3. Avoid Arbitrary Invocation
Authorities must avoid using the Gangster Act arbitrarily or indiscriminately, especially against political opponents, activists, or innocent persons.
The decision should be based purely on objective material and evidence.
4. Periodical Review
Cases registered under the Gangster Act must be reviewed periodically by senior officers or a special committee to ensure the continued justification of the charges.
5. Safeguards for the Accused
The directions emphasize respecting the fundamental rights of the accused, including protection from illegal detention or misuse of the Act.
⚖️ Legal Principles and Case Law
1. Section 2 of the UP Gangsters Act
Defines a "gangster" as a person habitually involved in criminal activities like murder, robbery, kidnapping, extortion, etc.
The Act empowers authorities to take special measures against such persons.
2. Key Judicial Pronouncements
a. State of U.P. v. Rajesh Gautam (2003) 10 SCC 322
The Supreme Court emphasized that laws like the Gangster Act are meant to deal with serious criminal elements.
Invocation must be based on clear material evidence and not on mere suspicion or uncorroborated complaints.
Courts will scrutinize the use of such laws to prevent misuse.
b. Ramanand and Another v. State of U.P. (2011) 4 SCC 239
The Court held that the Gangster Act cannot be invoked against persons for minor offenses or trivial quarrels.
The Act should target real criminals threatening public order and not used to suppress dissent or political opponents.
c. Arvind Kejriwal v. Union of India (2016) 4 SCC 1 (Related to misuse of stringent laws)
Though not directly about the Gangster Act, the Supreme Court laid down principles to check misuse of stringent laws.
It stressed the need for strict adherence to procedure and safeguards.
3. Principle of Due Process
Invoking a special law like the Gangster Act requires adherence to due process to protect citizens' rights.
Courts have repeatedly emphasized that special laws should not become tools of harassment.
🔍 Analysis
The UP government’s directions aim to:
Ensure proper checks and balances before invoking a powerful law like the Gangster Act.
Prevent its misuse for political vendetta or suppression of lawful dissent.
Focus on genuine threats to society and public order.
Protect innocent citizens from arbitrary action.
These directions align with the judiciary’s approach to stringent laws — strike a balance between effective crime control and protection of fundamental rights.
📝 Summary
| Key Direction | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Strict Preliminary Inquiry | Collect prima facie evidence of serious crimes and criminal history before invocation. |
| Senior Approval Required | Must get sanction from senior police or DM before proceeding. |
| Avoid Arbitrary Use | Invocation only for habitual criminals, not for minor offenses or political motives. |
| Periodic Review | Cases under the Act must be reviewed periodically for continued justification. |
| Safeguard Rights of Accused | Respect fundamental rights and prevent illegal detention or abuse. |
RELATED Blog
0 comments