Order Issuing Process U/S 204 CrPC Has Drastic Consequences; Requires Application Of Mind & Can't Be Passed...
Order issuing process under Section 204 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), its legal importance, the necessity for the application of mind by the magistrate, and the consequences of mechanical or careless orders
Order Issuing Process Under Section 204 CrPC
1. Section 204 CrPC – Overview
Section 204(1) CrPC deals with the procedure when a magistrate receives a complaint.
The magistrate is required to examine the complainant on oath (if necessary), and then decide whether the complaint discloses a cognizable offense.
If the complaint discloses a cognizable offense, the magistrate shall issue process (summon or warrant) to the accused to appear before the court.
If not, the magistrate shall reject the complaint.
Key Point: The issuance of process under Section 204 is the crucial first step in initiating criminal proceedings against the accused.
2. Significance and Drastic Consequences of Order Issuance
The order issuing process summons the accused into the criminal justice system.
It can have serious consequences for the accused, such as arrest, trial, social stigma, and interference with personal liberty.
Hence, the magistrate's decision to issue process is not a mere formality but a judicial function that requires careful and considered application of mind.
A mechanically or blindly passed order issuing process without application of mind violates principles of natural justice and may amount to abuse of judicial power.
3. Requirement of Application of Mind
The magistrate must carefully scrutinize the complaint and the supporting material (if any) to determine if the allegations, if proved, constitute a cognizable offense.
The magistrate must satisfy himself/herself that the complaint is not frivolous, vexatious, or misconceived.
The magistrate should not act as a mere post office or rubber stamp.
The order must clearly reflect that the magistrate has considered the facts and law before issuing process.
4. Order Under Section 204 CrPC Cannot Be Passed Mechanically
Courts have consistently held that a mechanical or routine issuance of process without examination and application of mind is impermissible.
Such orders are liable to be quashed to prevent miscarriage of justice.
5. Relevant Case Laws
a) B.S. Joshi v. State of Haryana, AIR 2003 SC 3295
The Supreme Court held that the order issuing process under Section 204 CrPC is the first judicial act in the criminal trial.
It requires the application of judicial mind, careful consideration of facts and legal provisions.
The Court warned against the practice of issuance of summons as a routine or mechanical matter.
b) State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal, AIR 1992 SC 604
The Court emphasized the importance of judicial discretion and the need for the magistrate to scrutinize the complaint to avoid abuse of the process of law.
The order issuing process is not automatic but based on prima facie satisfaction of the magistrate.
c) Lily Thomas v. Union of India, (2000) 6 SCC 224
The Supreme Court struck down mechanical or non-application of mind by the magistrate in the issuance of process, reiterating the need for judicial examination.
d) S.K. Sharma v. Union of India, AIR 1984 SC 1239
The Court held that the issuance of process is a judicial function requiring application of mind and the order should indicate reasons or at least be based on reasons.
e) Bhajan Singh v. State of Punjab, AIR 1964 SC 993
The Court observed that when a complaint does not disclose any offense or is frivolous, the magistrate must reject it, not issue process mechanically.
6. Consequences of Failure to Apply Mind
Orders issuing process passed without application of mind can lead to:
Quashing of proceedings initiated based on such orders.
Relief to accused in the form of discharge or quashing of FIR/complaint.
Prevention of abuse of criminal law for harassment.
7. Summary Table
| Aspect | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Section | 204 CrPC |
| Function | Magistrate examines complaint; issues summons if offense disclosed |
| Judicial Nature | Requires judicial mind and discretion |
| Not Mechanical | Cannot be passed as a routine, must apply mind |
| Consequence of Order | Summons/warrant issued; serious impact on accused |
| Legal Safeguard | Order must show application of mind; frivolous complaints rejected |
| Leading Cases | B.S. Joshi, Bhajan Lal, Lily Thomas, S.K. Sharma, Bhajan Singh |
8. Conclusion
The issuance of process under Section 204 CrPC is a critical judicial act that sets criminal proceedings in motion. It requires careful judicial scrutiny and application of mind by the magistrate. Mechanical issuance of summons or warrants without consideration of the facts and law leads to abuse of process of law and can cause serious prejudice to the accused. Supreme Court rulings firmly establish that such orders can be challenged and set aside to uphold justice and protect individual liberty.
RELATED Blog
0 comments