Kerala HC Asks Police Chief To Ensure Innocent Persons Are Not Arrested Due To Mistaken Identity
The Kerala High Court’s direction to the Police Chief to ensure innocent persons are not arrested due to mistaken identity is rooted in the fundamental principles of justice, fair investigation, and protection of individual liberty.
🔹 Context of the Judgment:
The Kerala High Court, while hearing a case where a person was wrongly arrested because he shared similar personal details with the actual accused (such as name or address), criticized the police's negligence and issued strong directions:
➤ The Court said:
“It is the duty of the police machinery to exercise due diligence before taking away a citizen’s liberty... A person should not suffer arrest and custody only because he has the same name as that of the actual offender.”
🔹 Core Legal Principles Involved:
1. Right to Personal Liberty:
Article 21 of the Constitution guarantees protection of life and liberty.
Arresting an innocent person without proper verification is a direct violation of this right.
2. Duty of Police to Conduct Fair Investigation:
Arrest is not a formality or routine; it must be based on credible identification and evidence.
Failure to differentiate between similarly named individuals shows a lack of professional responsibility.
3. Presumption of Innocence:
Every person is presumed innocent until proven guilty.
Arresting an innocent person without adequate confirmation undermines this principle.
🔹 Observations of the Kerala High Court (Paraphrased):
Law enforcement agencies must act with great caution and responsibility.
Mistaken identity arrests can irreparably damage a person’s reputation, mental well-being, and liberty.
The State has a constitutional and moral obligation to ensure its machinery doesn’t harass innocent people.
🔹 Directions Issued by the Court:
The State Police Chief (DGP) was directed to:
Issue proper instructions to all police stations.
Mandate strict verification of identity before effecting arrest.
Use modern identification tools (photographs, biometrics, digital records) to avoid errors.
Officers who arrest the wrong person may face disciplinary action.
🔹 Key Case Law Supporting This View:
1. Joginder Kumar v. State of UP, AIR 1994 SC 1349
The Supreme Court ruled that arrest should not be made casually. Police must have reasonable satisfaction that arrest is necessary and justified.
2. D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal, AIR 1997 SC 610
Established detailed guidelines for arrest, including proper identification, informing the arrestee of the reason, and informing relatives.
3. Sandeep Kumar v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi), Delhi HC
The High Court quashed an FIR against a man arrested due to mistaken identity and criticized the police for arresting without verification.
🔹 Practical Implications:
| Area | Implication |
|---|---|
| Police Procedure | Must verify identity using documents, photograph, or biometrics |
| Human Rights | Protects innocent persons from wrongful detention |
| Accountability | Police can be held liable for wrongful arrests |
| Technology Use | Encourages adoption of tech for proper identification |
🔹 Conclusion:
The Kerala High Court's directions serve as a reminder that arrest is not a casual act — it affects fundamental rights and dignity. The State machinery must act with precision, fairness, and responsibility to avoid grave errors like mistaken identity arrests. The order also underlines the importance of accountability in law enforcement.
RELATED Blog
0 comments