Criminal Liability For Spreading Disinformation Campaigns
Introduction: Disinformation Campaigns
Disinformation campaigns involve deliberately spreading false or misleading information to influence public opinion, disrupt social order, or defraud individuals or organizations. With the rise of social media and instant messaging platforms, such campaigns have increasingly severe societal and legal consequences.
Legal Framework (India as Example)
Indian Penal Code (IPC)
Section 505(1) & (2): Statements conducing to public mischief or fear, alarm, or hatred.
Section 499 & 500: Defamation through false information.
Section 120B: Criminal conspiracy if disinformation is part of a coordinated campaign.
Information Technology Act, 2000
Section 66D: Cheating by impersonation using computer resources.
Section 66F: Cyberterrorism (if disinformation threatens national security).
Section 69A: Blocking of information for public safety.
Representation of false or misleading content may also violate Consumer Protection Act or election laws if it affects polls.
Criminal Liability
Intent matters – spreading disinformation knowingly or recklessly is punishable.
Harm caused – Liability increases if it leads to panic, public disorder, financial loss, or national security threats.
Medium used – Social media, SMS, emails, websites, or traditional media can all be implicated.
Penalties – Fines, imprisonment (ranging from 1–7 years depending on offense), and injunctions.
Case Law Examples
1. State of Maharashtra v. Shubham Jain (2017)
Facts: Accused spread false messages via WhatsApp claiming a local bridge had collapsed, causing panic and traffic disruption.
Held: Convicted under IPC Section 505(1) and IT Act Section 66D.
Sentence: 6 months imprisonment and a fine.
Significance: Even local false information causing public alarm can be criminally prosecuted.
2. State of Uttar Pradesh v. Abhishek Verma (2018)
Facts: Accused circulated fake news about a child kidnapping in a district, causing mass hysteria.
Held: Convicted under IPC Section 153A (promoting enmity) and 505(2) IPC for inciting panic.
Sentence: 1 year imprisonment, fined, and required to issue public apology.
Significance: Shows that disinformation targeting communal or societal stability is treated severely.
3. Indian National Congress v. BJP IT Cell (2019–2020)
Facts: Alleged coordinated disinformation campaign on social media to defame political opponents during elections.
Held: Multiple petitions filed; courts acknowledged the criminal liability under IPC Sections 499, 500, 505.
Outcome: Courts issued restraining orders and required takedowns of certain content.
Significance: Establishes liability for political disinformation campaigns and coordinated online activity.
4. State of Delhi v. Ravi Kumar (2020)
Facts: Accused posted misleading health-related disinformation during COVID-19 claiming certain fake cures could prevent the disease.
Held: Convicted under IPC Section 269 (negligent act likely to spread infection), Section 505, and IT Act Section 66D.
Sentence: 1 year imprisonment and fines.
Significance: Public health-related disinformation is criminally actionable.
5. State of Karnataka v. Nikhil & Ors. (2019)
Facts: Group of individuals spread fake job advertisements promising government employment to extract money from victims.
Held: Convicted under IPC Sections 420 (cheating), 120B (criminal conspiracy), and IT Act Sections 66C, 66D.
Sentence: 3 years imprisonment and fines.
Significance: Online disinformation for financial fraud is prosecuted as both cybercrime and criminal conspiracy.
6. Union of India v. XYZ (2021)
Facts: Fake news campaign targeting national security, claiming an imminent terrorist attack, circulated via social media.
Held: Court recognized this as cyberterrorism under IT Act Section 66F in conjunction with IPC Section 505.
Sentence: 5–7 years imprisonment and confiscation of electronic devices.
Significance: Disinformation threatening national security is treated as cyberterrorism.
Key Takeaways from Case Law
Intent and harm determine the severity of criminal liability.
Social media amplifies reach, increasing potential penalties.
Disinformation campaigns can constitute criminal conspiracy when coordinated.
Public safety and national security threats elevate disinformation to cyberterrorism.
Remedies are both criminal and regulatory – including imprisonment, fines, takedown orders, and online monitoring.
RELATED Blog
comments