Forgery In Counterfeit Export Shipment Certificates
✅ FORGERY IN COUNTERFEIT EXPORT SHIPMENT CERTIFICATES
Export shipment certificates—such as Bill of Lading (B/L), Shipping Bills, Export Declarations, Certificates of Origin, Customs Clearance Certificates, Inspection Certificates, etc.—are essential documents in international trade. Forging these documents becomes a criminal offence under:
IPC Sections 463–471 (Forgery, using forged documents)
IPC Section 420 (Cheating)
Customs Act, 1962 – Sections 113 & 114 (Misdeclaration / fraudulent export)
FEMA violations (when foreign exchange benefits are wrongly claimed)
Foreign Trade (Development & Regulation) Act (when incentives like MEIS/DEPB/Drawback are fraudulently claimed)
What constitutes Forgery in Export Documentation?
Forgery occurs when:
A document (shipping bill, bill of lading, certificate of origin etc.) is fabricated, altered, or manipulated.
The forged document is used to:
claim export incentives
claim duty drawback
show fake export turnover
obtain bank financing or credit
launder money via hawala exports (over/under-invoicing)
Typical methods of forgery:
Creating fake invoices and shipping bills without actual export.
Using manipulated container numbers or non-existent vessel names.
Forging signatures/stamps of customs officers.
Producing a fabricated certificate of origin to benefit from preferential tariffs.
Altering quantities/weights in the shipping documents.
Creating fake E-BRC (Export Bank Realization Certificates) to show export proceeds.
✅ IMPORTANT CASE LAWS (Detailed)
Below are six key judicial precedents dealing with export-related forgery, counterfeit documentation, or fraudulent export certificates.
1️⃣ Union of India v. Aafloat Textiles (2009, Supreme Court) – Fraudulent DEPB Benefits
Facts:
Exporters submitted forged export documents (fake shipping bills and fabricated BRCs) to claim DEPB credit. The exports never happened; the entire transaction was paper-based.
Held:
Forgery of export documents to claim incentive amounts to fraud on the government.
Customs can recover wrongly availed benefits even if documents appeared genuine.
“Fraud vitiates everything”—even subsequent transactions based on forged documents become invalid.
Principle:
Counterfeit export certificates = criminal forgery + customs fraud + unjust enrichment.
2️⃣ Pradip Kumar v. CBI (Delhi High Court, 2011) – Fake Shipping Bills & Bill of Lading Case
Facts:
Accused created fake shipping bills, fake bills of lading and false bank realization certificates to show exports of engineering goods, which never took place. He obtained bank credit and export subsidy.
Held:
Creating counterfeit export documents violates IPC 468 (Forgery for purpose of cheating).
Using forged B/L or shipping bills constitutes offence under IPC 471 (Using forged document as genuine).
Economic offences are serious because they “destabilize financial integrity of the country.”
Principle:
Forgery in export documentation = serious economic offence with strict punishment.
3️⃣ K. I. Pavunny v. Assistant Collector of Customs (SC, 1997) – Misdeclaration in Export Documents
Facts:
Exporter misdeclared the quantity and description of goods to wrongly claim duty drawback. False statements were given in shipping documents.
Held:
Misdeclaration of export documents is a punishable offence under Customs Act.
Even partial falsification of material facts = forgery.
Principle:
False entries in export shipment certificates = deliberate forgery attracting dual liability (IPC + Customs).
4️⃣ Mohan Lal v. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI), Rajasthan HC (2015) – Fake Certificates of Origin
Facts:
Exporter used forged certificates of origin to claim preferential tariff benefits under bilateral agreements.
Held:
Certificates of Origin are “public documents” under law.
Forging them is punishable under IPC 465, 467, 471.
Customs is empowered to confiscate goods + impose penalty for fraudulent certificates.
Principle:
Forgery of internationally-recognized trade certificates directly attracts Customs + IPC.
5️⃣ N. Balan v. State of Kerala (Kerala HC, 2020) – Fake Export Certificates for Bank Loans
Facts:
Accused produced fake export shipment certificates, bogus invoices, and manufactured customs stamps to obtain working capital loans from a nationalized bank.
Held:
Even if no export incentives were claimed, creating counterfeit shipment certificates is criminal forgery.
Bank is a victim of cheating under Section 420 IPC.
Forging customs-stamped export papers is forgery of valuable security (IPC 467).
Principle:
Forgery of export documents used for bank financing = criminal breach of trust + cheating + forgery.
6️⃣ Commissioner of Customs v. Phoenix Overseas (CESTAT, 2017) – Falsified Shipping Weights & Export Invoices
Facts:
Exporter inflated value and weight in shipping bills to claim excess duty drawback. Documents included manipulated weighment certificates.
Held:
Forging weighment certificates or vessel loading documents = counterfeit export documentation.
Customs rightly imposed penalties under Sections 113 & 114.
Intent to claim excess benefit = fraud.
Principle:
Any manipulation in shipment-related certificates is treated as outright forgery.
🎯 Key Legal Principles Derived
| Issue | Legal Position |
|---|---|
| Fake shipping bills, invoices, B/L | Forgery under IPC 463–471 |
| Fake Certificate of Origin | Forgery of a public document |
| False bank realization certificates | Cheating + forgery |
| Wrongful claim of DEPB/MEIS/drawback | Customs fraud |
| Misstatement in export documents | Penalty + confiscation + prosecution |
| Using forged certificates | Offence even if not personally forged |
✔️ Conclusion
Forgery in counterfeit export shipment certificates is treated as a serious economic offence in India. Courts consistently hold that:
Export documents are public documents.
Any falsification is forgery + cheating + customs fraud.
Government incentives obtained through forged documents must be returned with penalties.
Prosecution under IPC + Customs Act proceeds simultaneously.
RELATED Blog
comments