Stalking And Harassment Offences
What is Stalking?
Stalking involves repeated and unwanted attention, harassment, or any conduct that causes a person to fear for their safety or suffer emotional distress. It often includes following, watching, or communicating with the victim in a threatening or obsessive manner.
What is Harassment?
Harassment broadly refers to unwanted behavior that causes alarm, distress, or interference with daily life. It may be physical, verbal, or psychological and does not necessarily involve fear for personal safety, though it often overlaps with stalking.
Legal Elements (Generally):
Repeated or persistent behavior
Causing distress, fear, or alarm
Intent or recklessness regarding the impact on the victim
Use of communication or physical proximity to intimidate or threaten
Legal Frameworks
Criminal statutes explicitly outlaw stalking and harassment.
Civil remedies may include restraining orders or injunctions.
Online harassment and cyberstalking laws have evolved recently to address digital abuse.
Case Law on Stalking and Harassment
1. R v. Curtis [2010] EWCA Crim 1117 (UK)
Facts:
Defendant persistently stalked and harassed a woman by sending numerous unwanted messages and following her.
Legal Issue:
Whether repeated messages and physical presence constituted stalking.
Outcome:
Convicted under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997; sentence upheld on appeal.
Significance:
Clarified that repeated communications causing distress qualify as stalking.
Established threshold for harassment includes emotional distress, not just physical threat.
2. People v. Anderson (2014) (California, USA)
Facts:
Anderson repeatedly sent threatening emails and followed the victim, causing fear for safety.
Legal Issue:
Application of California’s anti-stalking laws to electronic communications.
Outcome:
Convicted of felony stalking; court emphasized email harassment as valid stalking behavior.
Significance:
Recognized electronic communications as tools of stalking.
Affirmed expansion of stalking laws to cyberspace.
3. R v. Ireland; R v. Burstow [1997] UKHL 17
Facts:
Defendants engaged in persistent telephone harassment causing psychological harm to victims.
Legal Issue:
Whether psychological harm from silent telephone calls can amount to assault or harassment.
Outcome:
House of Lords ruled that psychiatric injury caused by harassment is actionable.
Significance:
Landmark case recognizing psychological injury from stalking.
Expanded definition of assault to include infliction of psychiatric harm.
Reinforced protection for victims of non-physical harassment.
4. State v. Smith (2016) (New Jersey, USA)
Facts:
Smith repeatedly sent abusive text messages and showed up at victim’s workplace.
Legal Issue:
Whether texting alone, combined with physical presence, suffices for harassment conviction.
Outcome:
Convicted under harassment statutes; appellate court upheld conviction.
Significance:
Confirmed combination of digital and physical actions constitute harassment.
Recognized evolving methods of stalking with technology.
5. R v. Douglas [2017] EWCA Crim 1904 (UK)
Facts:
Defendant was convicted of stalking after a pattern of persistent unwanted contact including social media messages.
Legal Issue:
Whether social media interaction constitutes stalking.
Outcome:
Conviction upheld; court emphasized stalking laws cover online behavior.
Significance:
Affirmed applicability of stalking laws to social media harassment.
Sent a message on serious consequences of online stalking.
6. Regina v. Johnson [2020] (UK)
Facts:
Johnson used multiple fake online accounts to harass and threaten his ex-partner.
Legal Issue:
Use of anonymity in online harassment and application of harassment law.
Outcome:
Convicted and sentenced to imprisonment.
Significance:
Tackled issues of anonymity and impersonation in stalking.
Courts willing to pierce anonymity to protect victims.
7. People v. Lacey (New York, 2018)
Facts:
Lacey repeatedly sent unwanted gifts, messages, and showed up at victim’s home.
Legal Issue:
Whether persistent unwanted contact with elements of fear and distress constitutes stalking.
Outcome:
Convicted on stalking charges; restraining orders issued.
Significance:
Reinforced courts’ protective stance on victims.
Showed harassment includes both direct and indirect actions.
Summary
Stalking and harassment encompass a wide range of behaviors, from physical following to digital harassment.
Courts recognize psychological harm and fear as key elements.
Electronic communications (emails, texts, social media) are valid methods of stalking.
Legal frameworks are expanding to address modern stalking tools like anonymity online.
Both criminal sanctions and civil remedies protect victims.
Persistent, unwanted conduct causing distress or fear is punishable.
RELATED Blog
0 comments