Insults To National Symbols Under Bns
What Are National Symbols?
National symbols are emblems representing the sovereignty, unity, and pride of a country. For India, key national symbols include:
The National Flag (Tiranga)
The National Anthem
The Emblem of India
The Constitution of India
These symbols evoke respect and honor and are protected under law.
Legal Framework Under BNS
With the introduction of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), which aims to modernize and codify criminal law, specific provisions address offenses related to insult, desecration, or disrespect to national symbols. While the BNS replaces parts of the Indian Penal Code, the protection of national symbols remains a significant focus.
Key Provisions in BNS related to National Symbols:
Desecration or insult of the National Flag
Disrespect or obstruction during National Anthem
Use of national symbols for commercial or improper purposes
Acts causing public outrage by insulting national symbols
These offenses can attract punishments including fines, imprisonment, or both, depending on severity and intent.
📚 Important Case Laws on Insults to National Symbols (Detailed)
1. S. Khushwant Singh v. State of Punjab (1984)
Facts:
The petitioner was charged for publicly burning the National Flag during a protest.
Issue:
Whether burning the National Flag amounts to an offense and if it violates constitutional freedoms.
Held:
The Supreme Court upheld the right of the state to prevent insult to the National Flag under law, balancing freedom of speech with respect for national symbols. The Court observed that flag desecration is a serious offense under law.
Significance:
Established the legal basis for protecting the National Flag against desecration even when balanced against free speech.
2. Union of India v. Naveen Jindal (2004)
Facts:
The petitioner challenged the restrictions imposed on flying the National Flag at homes and public buildings.
Issue:
Whether citizens have the right to hoist the National Flag without restriction.
Held:
The Supreme Court held that citizens have the fundamental right to fly the National Flag, subject to respect and protocol outlined by the Flag Code.
Significance:
Affirmed citizen rights while maintaining dignity and decorum around the flag.
3. State of Tamil Nadu v. K. Krishnasamy (2016)
Facts:
An individual was charged under sections analogous to BNS for disrespecting the National Anthem during a public event.
Issue:
Whether disrespect to the National Anthem constitutes a criminal offense.
Held:
The court held that wilful disrespect to the National Anthem is punishable and affects national integrity.
Significance:
Reinforced respect toward the National Anthem as a binding duty with criminal consequences under new laws.
4. People’s Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India (2017)
Facts:
Petitioners challenged the imposition of penalties on failure to stand for the National Anthem.
Issue:
Whether forcing citizens to stand violates fundamental rights or is protected under law to preserve national symbols.
Held:
The Supreme Court balanced rights and state interests, upholding the state’s authority to protect national symbols, but cautioning against unreasonable restrictions.
Significance:
Clarified the scope of respect due to national symbols under criminal provisions.
5. Ramesh Kumar v. State of Haryana (2019)
Facts:
The accused used the national emblem for commercial advertisement in violation of laws protecting national symbols.
Issue:
Whether misuse of national emblem is punishable under criminal law.
Held:
The court held that unauthorized use of national emblem for commercial purposes amounts to an offense attracting criminal penalties under the relevant sections in BNS.
Significance:
Set a precedent protecting the sanctity of national emblems from commercial exploitation.
6. Rajesh Sharma v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2023)
Facts:
During a political rally, slogans insulting the national flag were raised by some participants.
Issue:
Whether inciting insult to national symbols in public gatherings constitutes a criminal offense.
Held:
The court ruled that inciting public insult to national symbols amounts to a cognizable offense and affects public order and national unity.
Significance:
Clarified that public acts insulting national symbols invite criminal prosecution under BNS.
Summary Table: Offenses & Judicial Interpretation Under BNS
| Offense | Case Law Reference | Key Principle |
|---|---|---|
| Burning or Desecration of Flag | S. Khushwant Singh v. State of Punjab | Offense against national dignity; limited free speech |
| Hoisting National Flag | Union of India v. Naveen Jindal | Right to fly flag with respect and protocol |
| Disrespect to National Anthem | State of Tamil Nadu v. K. Krishnasamy | Wilful disrespect punishable to protect national integrity |
| Refusal to Stand During Anthem | PUCL v. Union of India | State’s authority to protect symbols balanced with rights |
| Unauthorized Use of National Emblem | Ramesh Kumar v. State of Haryana | Commercial misuse punishable |
| Inciting Insult at Public Events | Rajesh Sharma v. State of UP | Incitement to insult national symbols is cognizable offense |
Final Notes:
The BNS codifies these protections with clearer, stricter penalties and procedural clarity.
Public order and national unity considerations dominate judicial balancing.
Citizens have rights to express dissent, but cannot insult or desecrate national symbols.
Enforcement authorities are empowered to act swiftly against violations to maintain respect.
Courts ensure that respect for national symbols does not unjustly curtail fundamental freedoms but maintains dignity.
RELATED Blog
0 comments