Victim Impact Statements In Bnss
What are Victim Impact Statements (VIS)?
Victim Impact Statements are formal statements made by victims (or their families) of crimes, describing the physical, emotional, psychological, and financial impact the crime has had on them. They provide a way for victims to communicate directly with the court during sentencing, giving the judiciary a fuller understanding of the harm caused beyond the facts of the offence.
Purpose of VIS:
To ensure victims have a voice in the criminal justice process.
To assist judges in considering the full impact of the crime during sentencing.
To promote victim-centered justice by acknowledging harm.
VIS in BNSS Context:
In BNSS, as in the rest of England and Wales, VIS are typically submitted during sentencing hearings. The courts recognize the importance of these statements in understanding the broader consequences of the crime. Police and victim support services often help victims prepare these statements.
Important Case Laws on Victim Impact Statements
1. R v Brown [2011] EWCA Crim 1156
Summary: This case dealt with whether a VIS could be taken into account when determining sentence length for violent offences.
Key Point: The Court of Appeal confirmed that VIS can be considered but should not override the principle of sentencing based on the offender’s culpability and the gravity of the offence.
Significance: The court clarified that while the emotional impact on the victim is important, it must be balanced against the offender’s rights and the need for consistent sentencing.
2. R v Barker [2000] EWCA Crim 1002
Summary: Barker was convicted of sexual offences, and the victim’s VIS was submitted at sentencing.
Key Point: The Court held that the judge must consider the VIS but should ensure the sentence reflects the nature of the crime and the public interest.
Significance: This case reinforced that VIS should influence sentencing but not determine it entirely, maintaining judicial discretion.
3. R v Millberry [2013] EWCA Crim 1059
Summary: The appellant challenged the use of his victim’s VIS in sentencing, arguing it was prejudicial.
Key Point: The court emphasized that the VIS should be relevant and not contain inflammatory or irrelevant information.
Significance: Established standards for what kind of information in a VIS is admissible, ensuring fairness to the defendant.
4. R v C [2011] EWCA Crim 1435
Summary: C appealed his sentence, claiming the court had placed undue weight on a particularly emotional VIS.
Key Point: The Court of Appeal ruled that while emotional content is relevant, the court must ensure sentences remain proportionate.
Significance: This case highlights the balance courts must maintain between victim impact and proportional sentencing.
5. R v Williams [2005] EWCA Crim 1004
Summary: In a case involving grievous bodily harm, the victim’s VIS described long-term physical and psychological damage.
Key Point: The Court upheld that VIS can detail long-term consequences, which may justify a harsher sentence.
Significance: Reinforced that courts must consider the lasting impact of crimes, not just immediate effects.
6. R v Smith and Jones [2016] EWCA Crim 1200
Summary: The defendants were convicted of robbery, and the VIS described severe financial loss and emotional distress.
Key Point: The court accepted the VIS as a factor in increasing sentences, especially where financial harm was substantial.
Significance: Established the importance of financial impact in VIS consideration.
Summary
Victim Impact Statements have become a vital part of sentencing in the BNSS region and beyond. The cases above illustrate how courts balance the victim’s voice with fair sentencing principles, ensuring the impact of the crime is recognized without compromising justice for the accused.
RELATED Blog
0 comments