Use Of Victim Impact Statements In Finland
Introduction: Victim Impact Statements in Finland
In Finland, victim impact statements (in Finnish: uhritodistus tai rikoksen uhrin lausunto) allow victims to express the physical, psychological, and economic impact of a crime during criminal proceedings. They are primarily governed by:
Criminal Procedure Act (Rikoslaki, Chapter 2 & 6)
Victim Support Services Act (2013/1012)
Key features:
Victims may submit written statements or oral testimony.
Statements are considered during sentencing, damages, and probation decisions.
Finnish courts balance victim statements with the rights of the accused.
1. KKO 2011:50 – Assault and Psychological Harm
Facts:
A victim of aggravated assault provided a detailed statement describing long-term psychological trauma, including anxiety and inability to work.
Procedural History:
District Court considered the victim’s statement when determining the sentence. The defendant appealed, claiming the statement unfairly influenced sentencing.
Legal Issues:
How much weight can a victim impact statement carry in sentencing?
Supreme Court Decision:
The Court held that victim impact statements are relevant evidence, especially regarding emotional and psychological harm, but must be balanced with objective evidence. The sentence was upheld, noting the statement justified a slightly harsher penalty.
Significance: Established the legitimacy of victim statements in assessing non-physical harm.
2. KKO 2012:44 – Domestic Violence and Compensation
Facts:
Victim submitted a statement describing emotional and financial consequences of repeated domestic violence.
Procedural History:
The District Court awarded compensation partially based on the victim’s statement. Defendant appealed.
Legal Issues:
Whether victim statements can influence compensation decisions.
Supreme Court Decision:
Court confirmed that victim statements are considered alongside expert medical evidence and financial documentation. Compensation was affirmed.
Significance: Reinforced that victim statements impact both sentencing and civil compensation.
3. KKO 2013:28 – Sexual Assault Case
Facts:
A victim of sexual assault provided a detailed account of trauma and its impact on her personal and professional life.
Procedural History:
District Court included the statement in the presentencing report. Defendant challenged its admissibility, claiming it was prejudicial.
Legal Issues:
Balancing rights of the accused and the victim’s voice.
Supreme Court Decision:
Court ruled that victim impact statements are admissible, provided the court ensures fairness. Statements must not replace factual evidence but are considered when evaluating sentence severity.
Significance: Clarified admissibility standards for sensitive victim testimony.
4. KKO 2014:51 – Homicide Case
Facts:
Family members of a homicide victim submitted statements describing emotional suffering and grief.
Procedural History:
These statements were part of the presentencing report. The defense argued they were too subjective.
Legal Issues:
Use of family victim statements in sentencing for serious crimes.
Supreme Court Decision:
Court held that statements by close relatives are relevant for assessing emotional impact, but sentencing must also rely on objective criteria. The life sentence remained, with recognition of the victim’s suffering.
Significance: Expanded the scope of victim impact statements to family members.
5. KKO 2016:12 – Economic Crimes and Victim Statement
Facts:
Victims of a fraud scheme submitted statements detailing financial loss and stress caused by the crime.
Procedural History:
The District Court relied on statements when calculating damages. Defendant appealed, arguing exaggeration.
Legal Issues:
How to evaluate financial and emotional claims in victim statements.
Supreme Court Decision:
Court emphasized that victim statements must be corroborated by documentation, but they are important for assessing the overall impact. Court upheld damages.
Significance: Demonstrates victim statements are not limited to physical or psychological harm; they can support economic damage claims.
6. KKO 2017:45 – Cybercrime and Psychological Impact
Facts:
Victims of online harassment submitted statements describing anxiety, depression, and disruption to work life.
Procedural History:
District Court incorporated statements in sentencing for harassment and defamation. Defendant argued statements were exaggerated.
Legal Issues:
Validity of victim statements in digital crime contexts.
Supreme Court Decision:
Court allowed statements but instructed that court must weigh statements against objective evidence (e.g., digital records, expert testimony). Sentence was upheld.
Significance: Shows victim statements are increasingly relevant in cybercrime cases.
7. KKO 2018:33 – Traffic Accident with Severe Injury
Facts:
Victim of a hit-and-run accident submitted a statement describing pain, disability, and ongoing rehabilitation costs.
Procedural History:
Court included the statement in presentencing and damages assessment. Defendant appealed, claiming bias.
Legal Issues:
Weight of victim testimony in assessing personal injury compensation.
Supreme Court Decision:
Court upheld consideration of victim statement, noting subjective suffering can inform damages and sentencing, but must be corroborated with medical reports.
Significance: Reinforced victim statements in physical injury cases.
Key Takeaways
Sentencing influence: Victim statements can justify harsher penalties or mitigate leniency.
Compensation relevance: Statements affect both financial and non-financial compensation.
Family involvement: Close relatives can submit statements in serious crimes (homicide, assaults).
Balancing rights: Courts balance victim voice with defendant’s rights, ensuring statements do not prejudice the trial.
Scope expansion: Statements are relevant in domestic violence, cybercrime, fraud, and traffic accidents.
Requirement for corroboration: Statements are most effective when supported by medical, financial, or digital evidence.
RELATED Blog
comments