Pepper Spray Misuse Prosecutions
1. Legal Framework: Pepper Spray in Finland
Relevant Laws:
Firearms Act (AseLaki 1/1998, amended) — classifies pepper spray as a prohibited weapon for civilians unless licensed.
Criminal Code (Rikoslaki), Chapter 34 — offences against public safety and order.
Self-Defense Laws — permit use of force only in proportion to threat.
Definition:
Pepper spray misuse covers:
Carrying pepper spray without a license
Using pepper spray in public without justifiable self-defense
Using pepper spray to threaten, assault, or commit crimes
Penalties:
Minor possession or carrying: fines or confiscation
Misuse causing injury: 6 months–2 years imprisonment
Aggravated misuse (e.g., organized attacks, repeated offences): 2–4 years imprisonment
2. Principles in Finnish Case Law
Strict control: Pepper spray is treated like a firearm or other prohibited weapon.
Intent matters: Using it to threaten or injure increases severity; mere possession without license is still punishable.
Self-defense exceptions: Use must be proportionate to the threat; excessive use is prosecuted.
Combination with other crimes: Misuse often prosecuted together with assault or public disturbance charges.
3. Detailed Case Law Examples
Case 1: Helsinki District Court, 2010
Facts: Individual carried pepper spray in public without a license.
Court Reasoning: Unauthorized possession of prohibited weapon constitutes an offence.
Outcome: Fine of 30 daily units, pepper spray confiscated.
Significance: Possession without license is treated seriously, even without use.
Case 2: Turku District Court, 2012
Facts: Suspect used pepper spray during a bar fight, injuring another person.
Court Reasoning: Use exceeded lawful self-defense; intentional injury established.
Outcome: 1-year imprisonment, partially suspended, compensation to victim.
Significance: Misuse causing injury carries custodial sentences.
Case 3: Oulu District Court, 2014
Facts: Teenager threatened classmates with pepper spray at school.
Court Reasoning: Threatening others with a prohibited weapon constitutes assault and public safety violation.
Outcome: 6 months conditional imprisonment, supervised probation, confiscation.
Significance: Threats alone, without actual injury, are punishable.
Case 4: Helsinki Court of Appeal, 2016
Facts: Individual used pepper spray during a robbery attempt.
Court Reasoning: Use of prohibited weapon to commit a crime is aggravated offence.
Outcome: 3 years imprisonment, permanent prohibition on ownership of weapons.
Significance: Combination with other crimes significantly increases penalty.
Case 5: Tampere District Court, 2018
Facts: Repeated possession and misuse of pepper spray over a year by one individual.
Court Reasoning: Recidivism and repeated misuse constitute aggravating factors.
Outcome: 2 years imprisonment, confiscation of all pepper spray devices.
Significance: Repeat offenders face custodial sentences even if individual incidents were minor.
Case 6: Turku District Court, 2021
Facts: Individual used pepper spray in public transport, injuring multiple passengers.
Court Reasoning: Mass injury and public endangerment aggravates offence.
Outcome: 2.5 years imprisonment, fines, victim compensation, permanent ban on ownership.
Significance: Public endangerment leads to maximum penalties.
4. Observations from Finnish Case Law
Strict licensing rules: Unauthorized possession is always an offence.
Use in self-defense: Must be proportionate; excessive use is punished.
Combination with other crimes (assault, robbery) aggravates punishment.
Public safety violations lead to higher penalties (e.g., mass exposure in public places).
Recidivism and repeated misuse result in custodial sentences.
5. Summary Table of Cases
| Case | Year | Offence | Type | Outcome | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Helsinki DC | 2010 | Possession without license | Minor | 30 daily units fine, confiscation | No use, first offence |
| Turku DC | 2012 | Use in bar fight | Aggravated | 1 yr imprisonment, compensation | Misuse causing injury |
| Oulu DC | 2014 | Threatening classmates | Minor/conditional | 6 mo conditional, probation | Threat alone punishable |
| Helsinki CA | 2016 | Use in robbery | Aggravated | 3 yrs imprisonment, permanent ban | Combination with crime |
| Tampere DC | 2018 | Repeated misuse | Aggravated | 2 yrs imprisonment, confiscation | Recidivism increases penalty |
| Turku DC | 2021 | Public transport attack | Aggravated | 2.5 yrs imprisonment, compensation | Mass public endangerment |
RELATED Blog
comments