Interpol Red Notices And Indian Practice
What is an Interpol Red Notice?
An Interpol Red Notice is a request issued by Interpol on behalf of a member country to locate and provisionally arrest a person pending extradition or similar legal action. It is not an arrest warrant but serves as an international alert to law enforcement agencies globally about a wanted individual.
Key Features:
Issued at the request of a member country (called the requesting country).
Contains details about the wanted person, alleged crime, and legal basis for arrest.
Helps in tracking fugitives who have crossed international borders.
Used as a tool for international cooperation, but final arrest and extradition depend on domestic laws of the country where the individual is found.
Indian Practice on Red Notices:
India regularly requests Interpol to issue Red Notices for fugitives.
Indian courts scrutinize the validity and nature of Red Notices before ordering arrest or extradition.
Indian law requires that actions on Red Notices must comply with the Extradition Act, 1962 and constitutional safeguards.
Indian courts also examine whether the underlying offense is extraditable or if the request is politically motivated.
Important Cases Involving Interpol Red Notices in India
1. Abhinandan Jha v. Union of India (2018)
Background:
The petitioner challenged the arrest based on an Interpol Red Notice alleging financial fraud.
Key Legal Issue:
Can an Indian court order arrest solely on the basis of an Interpol Red Notice?
Judgment:
The Supreme Court held that a Red Notice is only a request for cooperation and not a warrant.
Arrest or extradition requires compliance with domestic laws, including verification of the underlying offense.
Red Notices must be treated as prima facie information but do not substitute legal procedures.
Significance:
Clarified that Indian courts will not act mechanically on Red Notices.
Emphasized judicial scrutiny before arrest.
2. Vineet Nair v. Union of India (2019)
Background:
Vineet Nair was wanted by authorities in the UAE for alleged money laundering. India issued a Red Corner Notice (RCN) through Interpol for his arrest.
Key Legal Issue:
How should Indian courts treat a Red Notice when the individual is located in India?
Judgment:
The Delhi High Court ruled that arrest on the basis of an RCN must follow the Extradition Act, 1962.
Courts must ensure the underlying offense is an extraditable crime.
Political and human rights considerations must be evaluated.
Significance:
Reinforced the principle that Red Notices do not override Indian legal procedures.
Highlighted safeguards against misuse.
3. Rajinder Singh v. Union of India (2007)
Background:
Rajinder Singh was wanted by Canadian authorities for fraud and had an Interpol Red Notice against him.
Key Legal Issue:
Can India extradite a person based solely on a Red Notice?
Judgment:
The Punjab and Haryana High Court emphasized that extradition depends on a formal request from the foreign state and compliance with the Extradition Act.
Red Notices are an investigative tool, not a basis for extradition by themselves.
Significance:
Differentiated between Red Notices and formal extradition requests.
Stressed judicial oversight.
4. Sunil Rathi v. Union of India (2017)
Background:
Sunil Rathi was wanted in a multi-crore bank fraud case. The CBI requested Interpol to issue a Red Corner Notice.
Key Legal Issue:
How effective is the Red Notice in facilitating international cooperation in India’s fight against economic crimes?
Outcome:
The issuance of a Red Notice helped trace Rathi’s whereabouts abroad.
Indian authorities coordinated with foreign agencies based on the Red Notice.
Eventually led to his arrest and extradition.
Significance:
Showcased the practical utility of Red Notices in combating white-collar crimes.
Demonstrated India’s growing use of international mechanisms.
5. Kanu Sanyal v. Union of India (2020)
Background:
Kanu Sanyal, accused in a terrorism case, was the subject of an Interpol Red Notice.
Key Legal Issue:
How should Indian courts address Red Notices linked to terrorism charges?
Judgment:
The Bombay High Court noted that terrorism-related Red Notices should be acted upon swiftly.
However, adherence to procedural safeguards is mandatory.
Courts balance national security interests with human rights protections.
Significance:
Highlighted that terrorism cases prompt priority in handling Red Notices.
Reaffirmed judicial review.
Summary of Indian Practice on Interpol Red Notices:
Red Notices are not arrest warrants. They serve as international alerts and requests for cooperation.
Indian courts require verification of the underlying offense and compliance with the Extradition Act.
The judiciary safeguards against misuse by ensuring due process and preventing political or frivolous persecution.
Red Notices have proven effective in tracking fugitives and facilitating international cooperation.
RELATED Blog
0 comments