rosecution Of Hate Crimes Motivated By Ethnicity And Religion
Prosecution of Hate Crimes Motivated by Ethnicity and Religion in Nepal
Nepal, with its multi-ethnic and multi-religious population, has faced several incidents where crimes were motivated by ethnic or religious animus. The Nepal Penal Code, 2017 criminalizes acts of violence, intimidation, or incitement based on caste, ethnicity, or religion. Courts have increasingly recognized the need to treat such acts as hate crimes, especially when they involve mob violence, murder, or public humiliation.
Case 1: Soti Village Massacre, Western Rukum (2020)
Facts:
In Soti village, Western Rukum, a group of Dalit men were killed after a dispute involving inter-caste relations.
The perpetrators attacked the victims, chasing some into a river, resulting in six deaths.
Legal Issues:
Whether the attack was motivated by caste-based hatred.
Liability of perpetrators under the Penal Code for murder and caste-based violence.
Court Decision:
The District Court convicted 24 individuals and sentenced them to life imprisonment; two others received two-year terms.
The court highlighted the caste-based motive as an aggravating factor.
Significance:
First major case where caste-based mass murder was explicitly recognized as a hate crime.
Established that motive related to ethnicity/caste can intensify criminal liability.
Case 2: Dalit Woman Humiliation, Morang District (2014)
Facts:
A Dalit woman was publicly humiliated and physically assaulted in Belbari after reporting an attempted sexual assault by a higher-caste man.
Legal Issues:
The assault and public humiliation were directly linked to the victim’s caste.
Determining whether this constituted caste-based hate crime.
Court Decision:
The National Human Rights Commission intervened, urging the court to impose maximum penalties.
The court later sentenced the perpetrators to imprisonment and fines.
Significance:
Demonstrated that even non-lethal forms of caste-based violence are prosecutable as hate crimes.
Highlighted the role of human rights institutions in ensuring justice.
Case 3: Attacks on Hindu Families, Sarlahi District (2024)
Facts:
A dispute escalated into a mob attack by a Muslim-majority group against Hindu families in Sarlahi district.
Homes were vandalized, and several Hindu families were threatened or injured.
Legal Issues:
Whether the attacks were motivated by religious identity.
Classification of the crime as religiously motivated hate violence.
Court Decision:
Police filed charges under the Penal Code sections dealing with assault and public disorder.
Sentences included imprisonment for mob leaders and restitution to victims.
Significance:
Showed that hate crimes can include property destruction and intimidation, not just physical assault.
Reinforced accountability for religiously motivated violence.
Case 4: Tharuhat Movement Violence, Kailali and Bardiya (2014)
Facts:
During the Tharuhat movement, political leaders incited ethnic violence, resulting in multiple deaths and injuries.
Victims were targeted based on ethnic identity.
Legal Issues:
Criminal liability of leaders for instigating ethnic violence.
Classification of mob attacks as ethnic hate crimes.
Court Decision:
Key leaders were sentenced to life imprisonment, while secondary organizers received 5–10 years.
Courts recognized ethnic hatred as an aggravating factor in sentencing.
Significance:
Established precedent for holding leaders criminally liable for inciting ethnic violence.
Strengthened the legal understanding of collective responsibility in hate crimes.
Case 5: Christian Minority Harassment, Eastern Nepal (1987)
Facts:
Krishna Bahadur Rai, a Christian, was arrested and sentenced to six years for evangelism.
His religious practice was criminalized under then-existing laws.
Legal Issues:
Whether the state could prosecute a person solely based on religious identity and activity.
Implications for protection of minority religious groups.
Court Decision:
The state convicted him under laws prohibiting proselytism at the time.
Significance:
Although historical, this case highlights the criminalization of religious identity.
It provides context for modern hate crime prosecutions where violence targets religious minorities.
Case 6: Dalit Killing in Banke District (2016)
Facts:
A Dalit man was attacked and killed by members of a higher-caste community following a land dispute.
Legal Issues:
Determining if caste-based animus motivated the killing.
Application of aggravated penalties for caste-based hate crimes.
Court Decision:
Court sentenced four individuals to life imprisonment for murder and caste-based violence.
Explicitly acknowledged caste as a motivating factor in the crime.
Significance:
Reinforced that hate motivation can increase sentencing severity.
Emphasized legal protection for vulnerable ethnic groups.
Key Patterns Across Cases
Caste and Ethnicity as Aggravating Factors: Courts consistently treat caste/ethnic motives as aggravating in violent crimes.
Religious Hate Crimes: Violence or harassment against religious minorities is increasingly recognized as criminally punishable.
Leadership Accountability: In cases involving mob violence, leaders or instigators face significant criminal liability.
Role of Human Rights Bodies: NHRC and civil society often influence the prosecution and sentencing in hate-motivated crimes.
Challenges: Many low-intensity hate crimes remain under-reported or misclassified as ordinary violence, underscoring the need for stronger legal enforcement.
RELATED Blog
comments