Sextortion Prosecution Cases
🔍 What is Sextortion?
Sextortion is a form of sexual exploitation where perpetrators threaten to share sexual images or videos of a person (often obtained by deception, hacking, or coercion) unless the victim complies with further demands, such as sending more explicit content, performing sexual acts, or paying money.
Under U.S. law, sextortion is prosecuted under several federal statutes, including:
18 U.S.C. § 875(d) – Extortion via interstate communications
18 U.S.C. § 2252 & 2252A – Child pornography production/distribution/possession
18 U.S.C. § 2422(b) – Enticement of a minor
18 U.S.C. § 2261A – Cyberstalking
18 U.S.C. § 1030 – Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (for hacking-related sextortion)
📚 Sextortion Prosecution Case Studies
1. United States v. Jared James Abrahams (2013)
Background:
Abrahams hacked into the webcams and email accounts of young women, including Miss Teen USA Cassidy Wolf, then threatened to release nude photos unless the victims sent more sexually explicit images or performed sexual acts on camera.
Charges:
Computer intrusion (CFAA)
Extortion
Wire fraud
Aggravated identity theft
Prosecution Strategy:
Used forensic analysis to link malware and emails to Abrahams.
Victims provided testimony and email/chat records.
FBI traced IP addresses and recovered compromising images.
Defense Arguments:
Abrahams claimed he had a compulsive disorder and sought therapy.
Pleaded for leniency due to youth and mental health.
Outcome:
Sentenced to 18 months in federal prison.
Key Lesson:
Even when not physically present with the victim, using tech to coerce sexual images is treated as a serious offense under both extortion and hacking laws.
2. United States v. Buster Hernandez (2017–2021)
Background:
Hernandez used the alias “Brian Kil” on Facebook to threaten minors across multiple states. He demanded explicit images and videos and made death threats to victims and schools if they refused. His tactics included digital manipulation and psychological abuse.
Charges:
Production of child pornography
Threats to injure
Sexual exploitation of minors
Computer hacking
Prosecution Strategy:
Facebook and FBI collaborated to unmask Hernandez using zero-day exploits.
Victim reports and tech analysis identified pattern of threats and coercion.
Digital forensic analysis found over 100 victims.
Outcome:
Pled guilty to 41 charges.
Sentenced to 75 years in federal prison in 2021.
Key Lesson:
Cross-jurisdictional sextortion involving minors results in severe penalties, especially when threats include violence or mass harm.
3. United States v. Lucas Michael Chansler (2014)
Background:
Chansler posed as a teenage boy on social media to coerce more than 350 minors into sending explicit images. He then blackmailed them for more content.
Charges:
Production of child pornography
Threats and extortion
Enticement of minors
Prosecution Strategy:
Traced fake accounts via IP and email data.
Subpoenas issued to social media and email providers.
Victim cooperation and device seizures were central.
Outcome:
Sentenced to 105 years in prison.
Key Lesson:
Mass-scale sextortion involving child victims and long-term manipulation attracts extreme sentences and permanent registry as a sex offender.
4. United States v. Ryan Hernandez (2020)
Background:
Ryan Hernandez initially gained notoriety for hacking into Nintendo servers, but a concurrent investigation revealed he had also obtained and collected explicit images of minors through sextortion tactics.
Charges:
Computer intrusion
Possession of child pornography
Attempted coercion and enticement of minors
Prosecution Strategy:
FBI discovered child exploitation material during a separate hacking investigation.
Chats showed Hernandez pretending to be a peer to elicit images.
Prior FBI warning to cease behavior aggravated his sentencing.
Outcome:
Sentenced to 3 years in prison after guilty plea, with long-term supervised release.
Key Lesson:
Sextortion discovered alongside other cybercrimes results in compounded charges and penalties.
5. United States v. Danny James Martin (2022)
Background:
Martin used Instagram and Snapchat to pose as a teenage girl, luring boys into sending nude images and later extorting them for more. Victims ranged from 11 to 15 years old.
Charges:
Sexual exploitation of a minor
Distribution and production of child pornography
Threats and coercion
Prosecution Strategy:
Law enforcement subpoenaed social media platforms for records.
Device forensics confirmed fake accounts and stored images.
Used victim testimonies and confession from the defendant.
Outcome:
Received a 50-year sentence.
Key Lesson:
Posing as a peer online to extort minors is aggressively prosecuted under federal child exploitation statutes.
6. United States v. Nathan Wyatt (2019)
Background:
Wyatt, a British national associated with the hacking group “The Dark Overlord,” conducted sextortion and data extortion campaigns. While not limited to sexual images, he often threatened to release sensitive personal material unless victims paid ransoms.
Charges:
Conspiracy to commit aggravated identity theft
Computer fraud
Extortion
Prosecution Strategy:
Used international cooperation to secure extradition from the UK.
Blockchain and email tracking tied activity to Wyatt.
Victims included minors and adults.
Outcome:
Sentenced to 5 years in federal prison.
Key Lesson:
Even when sextortion is combined with financial blackmail, it can trigger both cybercrime and sexual exploitation prosecutions, and jurisdiction is international.
7. United States v. Darin Schlesselman (2016)
Background:
Schlesselman posed as a modeling agent and convinced young women to send explicit images. He then threatened to release them unless they sent more.
Charges:
Interstate threats
Cyberstalking
Extortion
Prosecution Strategy:
Linked multiple email and social media accounts to Schlesselman.
Victim impact statements were key to showing psychological harm.
Subpoenas to modeling platforms helped show grooming tactics.
Outcome:
Sentenced to 7 years in prison.
Key Lesson:
Using a position of fake trust (like modeling) to obtain sexual content is prosecutable under both stalking and extortion statutes.
🧾 Summary Table of Sextortion Prosecutions
| Case | Notable Details | Outcome | Key Legal Lessons |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jared Abrahams | Hacked webcams, targeted Miss Teen USA | 18 months prison | CFAA + extortion used in sextortion |
| Buster Hernandez | Threats, mass coercion of minors | 75 years prison | Severity increases with threats & victim count |
| Lucas Chansler | 350+ victims, massive photo blackmail scheme | 105 years prison | Large-scale sextortion gets extreme sentences |
| Ryan Hernandez | Hacking + minor sextortion | 3 years prison | Multiple offenses increase complexity |
| Danny James Martin | Used fake female identity to lure boys | 50 years prison | Pretending to be a peer heightens sentence |
| Nathan Wyatt | Sextortion part of cyber extortion campaign | 5 years prison | Sextortion overlaps with cybercrime & ID theft |
| Darin Schlesselman | Fake modeling agent tactic | 7 years prison | Exploiting trust relationships leads to stalking |
⚖️ Common Legal Statutes in Sextortion Prosecutions
| Statute | Title |
|---|---|
| 18 U.S.C. § 875(d) | Threats via interstate communications (extortion) |
| 18 U.S.C. § 2251-2252A | Child pornography production/distribution/possession |
| 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b) | Coercion and enticement of a minor |
| 18 U.S.C. § 2261A | Cyberstalking |
| 18 U.S.C. § 1030 | Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (hacking) |
| 18 U.S.C. § 1343 | Wire fraud (used when involving online scams with payment) |
RELATED Blog
0 comments