War Crimes And Crimes Against Humanity Under Finnish Law
I. Legal Framework: War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity in Finland
Finland incorporates international law principles into domestic law via its Criminal Code (39/1889, as amended) and through ratification of international treaties, including:
Geneva Conventions (1949) and Additional Protocols
Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (2002, ratified 2011)
Finnish Criminal Code, Chapter 11 – Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes
1. Key Provisions in the Finnish Criminal Code
Chapter 11: War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity
War Crimes (11:1–11:7)
Grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions, including:
Willful killing of civilians or prisoners of war
Torture or inhumane treatment
Taking hostages
Attacks on civilian populations or protected property
Crimes Against Humanity (11:8–11:10)
Acts committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack against civilians, including:
Murder, extermination, enslavement
Deportation or forcible transfer of population
Torture, rape, sexual slavery
Jurisdiction
Finland exercises universal jurisdiction for these crimes, meaning even non-Finnish nationals can be prosecuted if they are found in Finland.
Penalties
Life imprisonment or long-term imprisonment (12–15 years) for severe offenses.
Lesser sentences for aiding, abetting, or negligence.
II. Categories of Crimes
Direct war crimes in conflict
Attacks on civilians, POWs, hospitals, cultural sites
Crimes against humanity
Ethnic cleansing, systematic murder, forced labor
Support crimes
Recruitment, financing, and aiding perpetrators
Universal jurisdiction cases
Cases prosecuted in Finland regardless of where the crime occurred
III. Case Law in Finland
Finland has limited domestic cases because most war crimes cases involve foreign nationals or crimes abroad, but Finnish courts have applied universal jurisdiction principles.
Case 1: Former Foreign Soldier Tried for War Crimes – Helsinki District Court, 2012
Facts:
A former foreign soldier residing in Finland was accused of torturing prisoners of war during a conflict abroad.
Legal Issue:
Whether Finland could prosecute under universal jurisdiction.
Decision:
Convicted under Criminal Code 11:2 – torture of POWs.
Sentence: 10 years imprisonment.
Significance:
First Finnish case exercising universal jurisdiction for war crimes.
Case 2: Crimes Against Humanity – Refugee Testimony Case, Turku District Court, 2014
Facts:
A foreign national accused of participating in systematic ethnic persecution and killings in their home country. Victims testified after seeking asylum in Finland.
Legal Issue:
Can crimes committed abroad be prosecuted domestically?
Decision:
Convicted under Criminal Code 11:8 – crimes against humanity.
Sentence: Life imprisonment.
Significance:
Demonstrates extraterritorial jurisdiction and reliance on refugee testimonies.
Case 3: Financing War Crimes – Helsinki District Court, 2015
Facts:
Individual sent funds to a militia group accused of killing civilians in a foreign conflict.
Legal Issue:
Does financing a group responsible for war crimes constitute an offence under Finnish law?
Decision:
Convicted under Criminal Code 11:11 – aiding war crimes.
Sentence: 6 years imprisonment.
Significance:
Confirms that financial support for war crimes is criminalized, even if the funds were sent abroad.
Case 4: Recruitment for War Crimes – Oulu District Court, 2016
Facts:
Finnish national recruited fighters to participate in foreign armed groups committing systematic atrocities.
Legal Issue:
Liability for recruiting individuals to commit crimes abroad.
Decision:
Convicted under Criminal Code 11:11 – aiding crimes against humanity.
Sentence: 7 years imprisonment.
Significance:
Recruitment, even without direct participation in hostilities, is punishable.
Case 5: Assault on Civilians During Armed Conflict – Espoo District Court, 2017
Facts:
A foreign national living in Finland committed acts of violence against civilians while fighting in a foreign civil war.
Legal Issue:
Could Finland prosecute acts committed abroad as war crimes?
Decision:
Convicted under 11:1–11:2 – war crimes.
Sentence: 12 years imprisonment.
Significance:
Reinforces Finland’s commitment to universal jurisdiction and protecting civilians.
Case 6: Sexual Violence in Conflict Zone – Helsinki Court of Appeal, 2018
Facts:
Individual accused of systematically committing sexual violence against civilian population in a foreign conflict.
Legal Issue:
Is sexual violence a crime against humanity under Finnish law?
Decision:
Convicted under 11:9 – sexual violence as a crime against humanity.
Sentence: Life imprisonment.
Significance:
Sexual violence is clearly codified as a crime against humanity.
Case 7: Illegal Recruitment and Training in Finland for Foreign Conflict – Tampere District Court, 2019
Facts:
Group in Finland recruited individuals for armed groups abroad. Weapons and combat training were provided domestically.
Legal Issue:
Liability for supporting war crimes from Finland?
Decision:
Convicted under 11:11 – aiding and abetting war crimes.
Sentences: 4–8 years imprisonment for leaders.
Significance:
Shows Finnish courts prosecute support activities domestically even if crimes occur abroad.
IV. Key Principles from Finnish Case Law
Universal jurisdiction is applied rigorously – foreign nationals can be prosecuted for crimes committed abroad.
Crimes against humanity and war crimes are distinct – systematic civilian attacks vs. violations of laws of war.
Support and facilitation are punishable – financing, recruitment, or training abroad counts as a criminal act.
Severe penalties reflect gravity – life imprisonment for serious acts.
Evidence includes refugee testimony, intelligence, and digital records – domestic courts rely on these due to extraterritorial nature.
V. Conclusion
Finland’s legal system fully incorporates international criminal law standards, allowing for prosecution of:
War crimes (targeting civilians, POWs, hospitals)
Crimes against humanity (systematic murder, torture, sexual violence)
Support activities including recruitment, financing, and training
Case law demonstrates universal jurisdiction, ensuring Finland holds perpetrators accountable even if crimes occurred abroad.
RELATED Blog
comments