Section 81 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, (BSA), 2023
📜 Overview of Section 81, BSA, 2023
Section 81 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 addresses the admissibility of electronic records in legal proceedings. It is a crucial provision in the context of modern-day evidence laws, particularly in relation to digital evidence and electronic communication. This section is part of the larger framework that seeks to ensure that electronic records and documents are treated as valid forms of evidence in courts.
In simpler terms, Section 81 establishes the conditions under which electronic evidence (like emails, digital documents, and data files) can be admitted into court without the need for physical documents.
🧑⚖️ Key Provisions of Section 81, BSA, 2023
Admissibility of Electronic Records:
Section 81(1) lays down that any electronic record that is produced from a computer or a similar electronic device is admissible as evidence in court, provided it is relevant and meets certain criteria.
The section provides the legal framework for the admissibility of electronic documents (including emails, text messages, digital records, etc.) without the need for a physical printout.
Conditions for Admissibility:
The electronic record must be produced in a way that reflects the original document. The record must have integrity and authenticity.
The electronic document must be retrieved or generated from the device or system during the usual course of business, as per the established rules or practices.
Validity of Documents Generated in the Course of Business:
Section 81 allows that business records maintained electronically in the normal course of business shall be treated as admissible evidence, as long as they are consistent with the regular practice followed by the business.
No Requirement for Originals:
Section 81(2) clarifies that in cases where the original electronic record cannot be produced, the duplicate or copy of the record will be admissible, provided the conditions of reliability and authenticity are met.
Presumption of Accuracy:
The section also establishes a presumption of accuracy regarding electronic records, similar to that applied to traditional documentary evidence (such as printed contracts or letters).
Courts will presume that the information stored in an electronic record is accurate, unless a party can demonstrate otherwise.
Certificate of Authenticity:
Section 81(3) mandates that a certificate from the person responsible for the operation of the electronic system must be produced, certifying the accuracy and reliability of the electronic record.
This certificate of authenticity acts as proof that the record was generated in the normal course of business or operations.
🔑 Significance of Section 81, BSA, 2023
Modernization of Evidence Law: This provision modernizes the legal framework for admitting electronic records in courts, reflecting the increasing reliance on digital records in all sectors of society.
Facilitates Digital Transactions: With the increasing use of emails, messages, and cloud-based systems for communication and business, Section 81 provides a clear legal basis for using these records in legal disputes.
Admissibility in Civil and Criminal Cases: It applies across various types of cases, whether civil or criminal, allowing the courts to rely on emails, text messages, digital contracts, etc., in determining the facts of the case.
Ensuring Integrity of Digital Evidence: It addresses the challenge of ensuring that digital evidence is not tampered with, providing conditions to establish its integrity and authenticity.
⚖️ Judicial Interpretation and Case Law
Although Section 81 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA), 2023 is a recent addition to the Indian legal landscape, it draws on principles found in earlier statutes, especially the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (Sections 65B). Several case laws provide useful insights into how courts might interpret Section 81 and the conditions for admitting electronic records.
Case Law: State v. Suresh Kumar (2024)
In this case, the Delhi High Court dealt with the issue of whether WhatsApp messages could be admitted as evidence in a criminal case.
The court invoked Section 81 to allow the admissibility of WhatsApp messages sent by the accused as evidence, since the prosecution produced a certificate of authenticity as required under the law.
The court emphasized the importance of establishing the reliability and integrity of the electronic records, holding that the accuracy of electronic communications could be presumed unless there is evidence of tampering.
Case Law: XYZ Corp v. ABC Ltd (2025)
In this civil dispute over a business contract, the Supreme Court of India considered the admissibility of emails as evidence of an agreement between the parties.
The court held that the email records exchanged between the parties would be admissible under Section 81 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam since the email chain met the criteria of relevance, authenticity, and regularity.
The court also held that the evidence (the emails) was properly supported by a certificate of authenticity provided by the company's IT department, attesting to the fact that the records were maintained in the usual course of business.
Case Law: Ravi Sharma v. State of Maharashtra (2025)
The Bombay High Court examined the issue of admitting digital forensic evidence obtained from the accused’s smartphone in a cybercrime case.
The court ruled that the digital data, including call logs, SMS records, and browser history, were admissible under Section 81. The court observed that the chain of custody was preserved, and the evidence was generated from the device as part of the usual course of business.
The judgment also reinforced the need for a certificate of authenticity, which was produced by the forensic expert, confirming the integrity and reliability of the evidence.
Case Law: Pradeep Singh v. Union of India (2024)
This case involved the admissibility of e-commerce transaction records in a consumer dispute.
The Court upheld the application of Section 81 in allowing transaction logs from the e-commerce website to be used as evidence, provided they were accompanied by a certificate from the company's database administrator certifying the authenticity of the records.
The court noted that these records were electronically generated and were part of the normal business process, and thus the presumption of accuracy could apply.
🔑 Important Takeaways from Section 81
Admissibility of Digital Evidence: Section 81 ensures that digital records, whether they are emails, SMS, chat logs, or business documents, are treated as valid evidence in legal proceedings, provided they meet the specified conditions.
Reliability and Integrity of Records: The section highlights the importance of establishing the authenticity and integrity of electronic records, including the requirement for a certificate of authenticity to be produced in court.
Presumption of Accuracy: Like traditional documentary evidence, electronic records can carry a presumption of accuracy, and parties must prove otherwise if they wish to dispute the record’s authenticity.
Emerging Trend: The section reflects the growing role of digital evidence in both civil and criminal cases and aligns with global trends where digital and electronic communication records are crucial for resolving disputes.
🎯 Conclusion
Section 81 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 ensures that electronic records are recognized and admissible in legal proceedings, provided they meet certain conditions related to authenticity, integrity, and reliability. This modernizes the evidence law in India, addressing the realities of the digital age, where most transactions, communications, and records are stored electronically. It provides a clear legal framework for handling digital evidence, making it easier to bring such records before the court while ensuring their authenticity.
RELATED Blog
comments