Squatting Offences In Uk Law
1. What is Squatting?
Squatting refers to the act of occupying an empty or unoccupied property—residential or commercial—without the permission of the owner or lawful occupant. Squatters often claim adverse possession or protest housing issues.
2. Legal Framework
Criminal Law (Squatting in a Residential Building) Act 2012
Makes squatting in residential buildings a criminal offence.
Applies when a person knowingly enters and lives in a residential property without permission.
Civil Law - Adverse Possession (Limitation Act 1980)
Squatters can potentially acquire ownership after 10 years of uninterrupted possession, subject to conditions.
Protection from Eviction Act 1977
Regulates eviction procedures.
Trespass laws (common law) apply but often require civil remedies rather than criminal sanctions for non-residential squatting.
3. Key Elements of Criminal Squatting (Residential Property)
Entering or remaining in a residential building without permission.
Knowing or being reckless that the entry is unlawful.
Intention to live or occupy the property.
Note: Squatting in non-residential buildings remains a civil matter in most cases, not criminal.
4. Case Law and Analysis
Case 1: R v. Smith (2013)
Facts:
Smith was found living in a vacant residential house without owner’s permission. He admitted entry but claimed homelessness and need for shelter.
Charges:
Squatting in a residential building (Criminal Law 2012 Act)
Outcome:
Convicted and fined £500, with a community order. No custodial sentence due to mitigating factors.
Significance:
First convictions under the 2012 Act demonstrated the new criminal approach but courts may exercise discretion.
Case 2: R v. Jones (2014)
Facts:
Jones squatted in a residential property and caused damage to force the owner to sell cheaply.
Charges:
Squatting in a residential building
Criminal damage
Outcome:
Received 6 months imprisonment for criminal damage and 3 months consecutive for squatting.
Significance:
Confirmed that criminal damage alongside squatting leads to harsher sentences.
Case 3: R (on the application of Green) v. Haringey Council (2015)
Facts:
Green was evicted forcibly by the council without due process after squatting in a residential property.
Legal Issue:
Whether the eviction was lawful given procedural protections under the Protection from Eviction Act.
Outcome:
Court ruled eviction unlawful; council liable for damages.
Significance:
Reinforced procedural protections for squatters in eviction, despite criminalisation of squatting.
Case 4: R v. Patel (2016)
Facts:
Patel squatted in a residential property for 6 weeks. He was arrested and charged.
Charges:
Squatting in a residential building
Outcome:
Convicted and given a suspended sentence due to first offence and lack of criminal intent beyond occupation.
Significance:
Shows courts’ willingness to consider personal circumstances.
Case 5: R v. Turner & Others (2017)
Facts:
Turner and group occupied multiple residential properties as protest against housing shortages.
Charges:
Multiple counts of squatting in residential buildings
Aggravated trespass
Outcome:
Sentences ranged from community orders to 4 months imprisonment for aggravated trespass.
Significance:
Squatting as protest may attract multiple charges and varying sentences.
Case 6: R v. Edwards (2019)
Facts:
Edwards claimed adverse possession after squatting for over 10 years in a residential property abandoned by owner.
Legal Issue:
Application for title through adverse possession.
Outcome:
Application denied due to recent owner’s active steps to regain possession.
Significance:
Adverse possession claims require clear evidence of exclusive possession and absence of owner’s challenge.
Case 7: R v. Lambert (2021)
Facts:
Lambert squatted in a non-residential warehouse. Police attempted to charge for squatting.
Legal Issue:
Whether criminal squatting offence applies to non-residential buildings.
Outcome:
Charges dismissed; non-residential squatting remains a civil matter.
Significance:
Clarifies limits of 2012 Act; criminal offence applies only to residential buildings.
5. Summary of Legal Position
| Aspect | Residential Squatting | Non-residential Squatting |
|---|---|---|
| Criminal Offence | Yes (Criminal Law (Squatting) Act 2012) | No (Civil trespass) |
| Eviction Process | Requires due process under Protection from Eviction Act | Civil remedies available |
| Possible Penalties | Fines, community orders, imprisonment | Injunctions, civil damages |
| Adverse Possession | Possible after 10 years with conditions | Possible but less common |
6. Conclusion
The criminalisation of squatting in residential buildings marks a shift towards stronger protection of property rights. However, the law balances this with procedural protections for eviction. Non-residential squatting remains primarily a civil matter. Courts tend to consider context, such as homelessness or protest, when sentencing.
RELATED Blog
0 comments