Cross-Border Trafficking With Iran And Pakistan
1. Overview: Cross-Border Trafficking Between Afghanistan, Iran, and Pakistan
Cross-border trafficking in this region primarily involves:
Women and children trafficked for forced marriage, labor, and sexual exploitation.
Men and boys smuggled for forced labor in agriculture, brick kilns, or construction.
Refugees and migrants transported illegally through smuggling networks across the Durand Line (Afghanistan–Pakistan) and the Iran–Afghanistan border.
Taliban and militant networks sometimes profiting from human trafficking and migrant smuggling routes.
The legal framework for prosecuting such crimes includes:
Afghan Penal Code (Articles 510–518) — defining human trafficking, migrant smuggling, and related organized crime.
Law on Combatting Human and Migrant Trafficking (2017) — providing punishments and victim protection.
International Protocols — such as the UN Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons (Palermo Protocol, 2000) and UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime.
2. Major Cross-Border Trafficking Cases and Judicial Actions
Case 1: Herat–Iran Trafficking Network (2019)
Facts:
In 2019, Afghan authorities dismantled a large network based in Herat Province that trafficked women and children to Mashhad and Zahedan, Iran. The victims were promised domestic work or marriage but were sold into forced labor and sexual exploitation.
Investigation:
Over 60 victims were identified, including minors from Badghis and Ghor provinces. Iranian border guards intercepted a group of trafficked women, which led to a joint investigation by Afghan and Iranian police.
Court Outcome:
Herat Primary Court sentenced three Afghan traffickers to 15 years each under Article 510 of the Penal Code. The court also ordered compensation for victims.
Legal Importance:
It was one of the first cross-border trafficking cases where Afghan courts used evidence collected jointly with a foreign government, marking progress in transnational cooperation.
Case 2: Kandahar–Balochistan Child Labor Smuggling Case (2020)
Facts:
A group of traffickers smuggled Afghan boys aged 10–16 into Pakistan’s Balochistan region for work in brick kilns near Quetta. Many were beaten, starved, and denied wages.
Investigation:
A joint Afghan–Pakistani task force identified over 100 victims, rescued 34, and arrested five traffickers operating near Spin Boldak.
Court Proceedings:
In 2021, the Kandahar Counter-Trafficking Court sentenced two main traffickers to 18 years in prison under the 2017 Anti-Trafficking Law.
Legal Significance:
This case demonstrated that forced labor of children constituted trafficking even when victims consented due to poverty — aligning Afghan law with international norms.
Case 3: Zaranj–Nimroz Migrant Smuggling Route Case (2021)
Facts:
Zaranj (in Nimroz Province) is a key hub for smuggling migrants to Iran and beyond. In 2021, Afghan police arrested a gang that smuggled over 500 Afghans annually through the Desert Route into Iran, charging $800–$1,200 per person.
Outcome:
The traffickers used fake identity cards and bribed border officials. After a six-month investigation, seven traffickers were convicted under Article 513 of the Penal Code and sentenced to 12 years each.
Legal Importance:
The case was critical in differentiating migrant smuggling (for profit) from human trafficking (involving coercion and exploitation) — both punishable under Afghan law.
Case 4: Afghan Women Trafficked for Forced Marriage in Pakistan (2018)
Facts:
Dozens of Afghan women were trafficked from Nangarhar and Laghman provinces into Pakistan under the guise of marriage to Pakistani men. Families were offered dowries, but the women were later sold or enslaved in Punjab and Sindh.
Investigation:
The case came to light when two victims escaped from Lahore and reached the Afghan embassy. With embassy support, a complaint was filed under Afghan trafficking law.
Court Outcome:
In 2019, the Nangarhar Provincial Court convicted four recruiters under Article 511 and sentenced them to 20 years imprisonment.
Legal Importance:
This case recognized marriage trafficking as a form of human trafficking, emphasizing that consent obtained through deception is invalid.
Case 5: Helmand–Iran Drug and Human Trafficking Case (2022)
Facts:
In Helmand Province, traffickers mixed human smuggling with drug smuggling routes. Victims, mostly young men, were told they would reach Tehran for jobs but were forced to carry narcotics across the border.
Investigation:
After a cross-border raid coordinated with Iranian border police, four major traffickers were arrested. Evidence included satellite phones and fake passports.
Court Decision:
The Helmand Counter-Trafficking Court found them guilty of both human trafficking and drug smuggling, sentencing them to life imprisonment.
Legal Importance:
This case established a precedent that forcing victims to commit crimes, such as drug transport, still constitutes trafficking under Afghan law.
Case 6: Pakistan–Afghanistan Organ Trafficking Case (2017)
Facts:
In 2017, an international organ trafficking ring was uncovered between Peshawar (Pakistan) and Jalalabad (Afghanistan). Poor Afghans were lured with false job offers, then had their kidneys removed in illegal clinics.
Outcome:
Afghan police, cooperating with Pakistani authorities, arrested two Afghan doctors and three brokers. The Jalalabad Primary Court convicted them under the Law on Organ Trafficking and Penal Code Article 515, sentencing them to 25 years.
Legal Importance:
It was the first Afghan case addressing organ trafficking, expanding the definition of exploitation beyond sexual or labor purposes.
Case 7: Taliban-Era Border Trafficking Crackdown (2023)
Facts:
After the Taliban took control in 2021, reports increased of traffickers using informal border crossings near Farah, Herat, and Nimroz. In 2023, Taliban border police arrested several smugglers moving women to Iran.
Outcome:
Although prosecuted under the Taliban’s interpretation of Sharia, several traffickers were sentenced to public lashings and long prison terms.
Legal Observation:
Human rights groups criticized the lack of due process but acknowledged that it disrupted trafficking routes. The case reflected parallel justice systems — Sharia-based Taliban courts versus international anti-trafficking standards.
3. Key Legal Principles Derived
| Legal Issue | Case Example | Precedent/Principle Established |
|---|---|---|
| Forced marriage as trafficking | Nangarhar Marriage Case | Consent obtained through fraud = trafficking |
| Child labor cross-border | Kandahar–Balochistan Case | Child labor under coercion = trafficking |
| Smuggling vs. trafficking | Nimroz Route Case | Smuggling becomes trafficking when exploitation begins |
| Organ trafficking | Jalalabad Case | Illegal organ removal = trafficking exploitation |
| Joint regional cooperation | Herat–Iran Case | Shared investigation and evidence admissible |
4. Summary and Legal Impact
Cross-border trafficking between Afghanistan, Iran, and Pakistan remains one of the most complex human rights and criminal challenges in South Asia.
Through cases from Herat, Nimroz, Kandahar, and Jalalabad, Afghan courts have:
Expanded the interpretation of “exploitation” under national law.
Recognized cross-border cooperation as key to successful prosecutions.
Reinforced that trafficking victims cannot be criminalized for illegal border crossing.
These precedents have shaped Afghan jurisprudence on transnational crimes and provided a foundation for aligning domestic law with international standards.
RELATED Blog
0 comments