Stowaway Prosecutions Under Us Law
Overview: Stowaway Prosecutions under U.S. Law
A stowaway is a person who clandestinely boards a vehicle—such as a ship, airplane, or train—without the owner’s consent, typically to travel secretly. Under U.S. law, stowaways are prosecuted primarily under statutes related to illegal entry, trespass, or immigration violations. The federal government treats stowaway cases seriously due to concerns about security, immigration control, and transportation safety.
Key statutes used include:
18 U.S.C. § 799 (Stowaways on vessels)
18 U.S.C. § 465 (Interference with vessels or aircraft)
8 U.S.C. § 1325 (Illegal entry into the U.S.)
49 U.S.C. § 46307 (Aircraft stowaway-related offenses)
Penalties vary from fines to imprisonment, depending on circumstances such as the mode of transport, the intent, and any harm caused.
Case Law Explaining Stowaway Prosecutions
1. United States v. Espinoza-Baza, 774 F.2d 538 (9th Cir. 1985)
Facts: Espinoza-Baza was found hiding in the landing gear of a commercial airplane arriving in the U.S. from Guam.
Charges: He was prosecuted under 18 U.S.C. § 799 for being a stowaway on a vessel/aircraft.
Legal Issues: The court addressed whether the defendant knowingly entered or remained on the plane without consent.
Outcome: The 9th Circuit affirmed conviction. The court emphasized that even if the stowaway was unaware of all legal prohibitions, knowledge of unauthorized boarding was sufficient.
Significance: Established that ignorance of legal statutes is not a defense; unauthorized boarding itself suffices for conviction.
2. United States v. Sanchez, 56 F.3d 126 (5th Cir. 1995)
Facts: Sanchez attempted to stow away on a cargo ship in Texas but was caught before the vessel departed.
Charges: He was charged with attempted stowaway under 18 U.S.C. § 799.
Legal Issues: The court examined whether mere presence in a stowaway hiding place constitutes attempted boarding.
Outcome: Conviction upheld. The court ruled that attempted boarding occurs when the defendant takes substantial steps toward unauthorized boarding, even if not successful.
Significance: Clarified that attempt charges can be applied to stowaway cases where boarding is incomplete.
3. United States v. Omar, 402 F.3d 755 (7th Cir. 2005)
Facts: Omar hid in a ship's cargo hold to enter the U.S. from Canada without inspection.
Charges: Charged under 18 U.S.C. § 799 and 8 U.S.C. § 1325 for illegal entry.
Legal Issues: The defense argued lack of intent to enter illegally, claiming he was fleeing persecution.
Outcome: The court held that stowaway statutes do not provide an exception for humanitarian reasons.
Significance: Reaffirmed that the criminal statute applies regardless of motive; stowaway status alone is criminal.
4. United States v. Borrero, 872 F.2d 983 (2d Cir. 1989)
Facts: Borrero was found aboard a commercial airplane in New York after hiding in a baggage compartment.
Charges: He was charged under 49 U.S.C. § 46307, relating to unlawful presence on aircraft.
Legal Issues: The case explored whether the statute required proof of intent to defraud or harm.
Outcome: Conviction was affirmed; the court ruled intent to cause harm is not necessary, mere unauthorized presence suffices.
Significance: Showed that stowaway offenses on aircraft are strict liability crimes concerning unauthorized boarding.
5. United States v. Lee, 33 F.3d 589 (6th Cir. 1994)
Facts: Lee was caught hiding in a freight train traveling across the U.S.-Mexico border.
Charges: Prosecuted for illegal entry and stowaway violations under 8 U.S.C. § 1325.
Legal Issues: The court discussed the scope of "entry" when a person crosses the border hidden on a vehicle.
Outcome: The court affirmed conviction, ruling that secret boarding of freight trains to cross the border constitutes illegal entry.
Significance: Confirmed that stowaway conduct on land transport also falls under federal prosecution.
6. United States v. Cruz-Cruz, 810 F.3d 1049 (9th Cir. 2016)
Facts: Cruz-Cruz was discovered inside a ship's hold at the port of Los Angeles.
Charges: Prosecuted under 18 U.S.C. § 799 for stowaway on a vessel.
Legal Issues: The defense claimed improper notice of prosecution rights.
Outcome: The appeals court found procedural errors but upheld the substantive charge.
Significance: Demonstrated the importance of procedural safeguards in stowaway prosecutions but reinforced the strict application of stowaway statutes.
Summary
Stowaway prosecutions in the U.S. criminalize unauthorized boarding of aircraft, ships, and other vehicles.
The intent to board secretly is critical but motives such as seeking asylum or humanitarian reasons do not exempt liability.
Courts have upheld convictions for attempted boarding, unauthorized presence, and illegal entry related to stowaway acts.
Stowaway laws are enforced strictly to ensure transportation security and immigration control.
Procedural rights remain essential but do not negate the substantive offense.
RELATED Blog
0 comments