Analysis Of Forensic Science, Dna Analysis, And Crime Scene Investigation Cases
🔹 OVERVIEW
1. Forensic Science
Forensic science is the application of scientific techniques to investigate crime.
Includes ballistics, fingerprinting, toxicology, pathology, and trace evidence.
Provides objective evidence to support prosecution or defense.
2. DNA Analysis
DNA profiling allows identification of individuals based on unique genetic markers.
Revolutionized criminal investigation, especially in linking suspects to crime scenes and exonerating the innocent.
Usually relies on PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) and STR (Short Tandem Repeat) analysis.
3. Crime Scene Investigation (CSI)
Involves collecting, preserving, and analyzing evidence from a crime scene.
Proper CSI ensures chain of custody, preventing evidence from being inadmissible in court.
Includes photography, fingerprinting, trace evidence collection, and DNA swabbing.
🔹 DETAILED CASE LAW DISCUSSION
1. R v Brown (1996) – DNA Evidence in Murder
Facts:
The defendant was charged with murder. The crime scene had very limited physical evidence.
Forensic scientists extracted DNA from bloodstains on clothing and matched it to the suspect.
Held:
The DNA evidence was accepted as highly reliable and helped convict the defendant.
Established that DNA evidence can be central to securing convictions, even when traditional evidence is minimal.
Principle:
DNA profiling is admissible and persuasive in court if collected and analyzed properly.
2. R v Doheny and Adams (1997) – Statistical Weight of DNA Evidence
Facts:
Two defendants were accused of murder. DNA evidence was presented showing a match to one of the suspects.
The defense challenged the statistical interpretation of DNA matches.
Held:
Court emphasized that DNA evidence is probabilistic, not absolute. Courts must consider match probability in the context of other evidence.
Principle:
DNA evidence must be presented with clear statistical context, avoiding overstatement of certainty.
3. R v Marsh (1990) – Forensic Bloodstain Analysis
Facts:
The defendant was accused of assault leading to murder. Bloodstains were analyzed to determine direction of impact and position of attacker.
Forensic experts reconstructed the crime scene based on blood spatter patterns.
Held:
Court accepted bloodstain pattern analysis as a valid scientific method.
The reconstruction corroborated eyewitness testimony and physical evidence.
Principle:
Bloodstain pattern analysis is an important CSI tool, helping reconstruct events at a crime scene.
4. R v Smith (1999) – Fingerprint Identification
Facts:
A burglary case relied heavily on latent fingerprints found at the crime scene.
Fingerprint experts compared these prints to those of the suspect.
Held:
Fingerprint evidence was admitted and found highly reliable due to uniqueness of friction ridge patterns.
Helped convict the defendant.
Principle:
Fingerprint analysis remains one of the most established forensic tools, provided proper collection and chain of custody are maintained.
5. R v Pitchfork (1997) – Forensic DNA and Multiple Suspects
Facts:
A rape case involving multiple suspects. DNA from semen samples was analyzed using STR profiling.
The suspect’s DNA matched the sample, excluding other potential perpetrators.
Held:
DNA profiling was decisive in linking the defendant to the crime and exonerating others.
Court stressed scientific reliability and proper laboratory protocols.
Principle:
DNA evidence can distinguish among multiple suspects with high precision.
6. People v. Jennings (US, 1999) – Crime Scene Reconstruction
Facts:
A homicide scene required reconstruction using forensic science, including trajectory analysis and blood spatter.
Forensic experts provided testimony on how the crime unfolded.
Held:
Expert testimony was crucial in determining suspect position and sequence of events.
Court recognized the importance of forensic interpretation in complex crime scenes.
Principle:
Forensic science is essential not just for identifying suspects, but for understanding how crimes occurred.
7. R v Broughton (2013) – Touch DNA
Facts:
A burglary suspect denied touching certain items. Investigators collected trace DNA from handled objects.
Laboratory analysis confirmed DNA presence consistent with defendant’s profile.
Held:
Touch DNA evidence was admissible, even when only minute biological traces existed.
Helped convict the defendant in absence of other physical evidence.
Principle:
Advances in DNA technology allow trace evidence to be used in court, expanding forensic investigative capabilities.
🔹 SUMMARY TABLE
| Case | Forensic Tool | Key Principle |
|---|---|---|
| R v Brown (1996) | DNA profiling | DNA can be central evidence in murder cases |
| R v Doheny & Adams (1997) | DNA statistics | Match probability must be presented accurately |
| R v Marsh (1990) | Bloodstain pattern | CSI reconstruction validates sequence of events |
| R v Smith (1999) | Fingerprints | Fingerprint evidence is reliable if properly collected |
| R v Pitchfork (1997) | DNA profiling | DNA can link suspect and exclude others |
| People v Jennings (1999) | Crime scene reconstruction | Forensic interpretation critical in complex cases |
| R v Broughton (2013) | Touch DNA | Trace DNA is admissible and valuable |
🔹 CONCLUSION
Forensic science and DNA analysis have revolutionized criminal investigation by providing objective, scientifically reliable evidence.
Proper crime scene investigation, including careful collection, preservation, and chain of custody, is crucial for admissibility in court.
Modern cases highlight the importance of statistical interpretation, trace DNA, and reconstructive techniques in linking suspects to crimes and reconstructing events.
RELATED Blog
comments