Appeals To The Court Of Appeal
🌐 1. Understanding Appeals to the Court of Appeal
1.1 Definition
An appeal is a legal process where a party challenges a decision of a lower court in a higher court, seeking reversal, modification, or re-evaluation of the judgment.
The Court of Appeal typically hears appeals from:
High Court decisions (civil and criminal matters)
Lower courts (depending on jurisdiction)
1.2 Grounds for Appeal
Error of law – Misinterpretation or misapplication of legal principles.
Error of fact – Incorrect assessment of evidence.
Procedural irregularity – Violation of natural justice or legal procedures.
Excessive or inadequate sentencing – In criminal matters.
1.3 Powers of the Court of Appeal
Confirm, reverse, or modify the lower court decision.
Remand the case for retrial or further investigation.
Award damages or compensation in civil matters.
⚖️ 2. Major Case Laws Involving Appeals to the Court of Appeal
Case 1: Donoghue v. Stevenson [1932] AC 562 (UK)
Court: Court of Appeal (prior to House of Lords decision)
Facts:
A woman became ill after drinking ginger beer containing a decomposed snail.
Sued the manufacturer for negligence.
Appeal:
Initially, lower courts were divided on liability.
Appeal taken to the Court of Appeal for review of negligence principles.
Judgment:
Established neighbor principle and manufacturer duty of care.
Court of Appeal recognized duty to avoid acts causing foreseeable harm.
Significance:
Landmark in tort law.
Demonstrates how appellate courts clarify legal principles and guide future cases.
Case 2: R v. Jogee [2016] UKSC
Court: Court of Appeal (criminal appeal)
Facts:
Jogee was convicted of murder under the doctrine of joint enterprise.
Argued misdirection on liability principles in lower courts.
Appeal:
Appealed to Court of Appeal claiming misinterpretation of joint enterprise law.
Judgment:
Court of Appeal quashed conviction, ruling mere presence at the crime scene is insufficient for murder liability.
Significance:
Clarified the role of intent in criminal appeals.
Shows appellate courts can overturn longstanding legal interpretations.
Case 3: R v. Brown [1993] UKHL (via Court of Appeal)
Court: Court of Appeal (criminal appeal before House of Lords)
Facts:
Group engaged in consensual sado-masochistic acts causing bodily harm.
Convicted under Offences Against the Person Act 1861.
Appeal:
Appealed to Court of Appeal arguing consent should be a defense.
Judgment:
Court of Appeal upheld convictions, noting public policy considerations.
House of Lords later confirmed ruling.
Significance:
Illustrates limits of appeal based on public interest vs personal autonomy.
Demonstrates appellate review on legal and policy grounds.
Case 4: Gillick v. West Norfolk and Wisbech AHA [1985]
Court: Court of Appeal (civil appeal)
Facts:
A doctor provided contraceptive advice to minors without parental consent.
Parents challenged legality.
Appeal:
Case appealed after initial High Court ruling favoring the doctor.
Judgment:
Court of Appeal recognized “Gillick competence”, balancing minor’s autonomy and parental rights.
Significance:
Defined legal principles for consent and capacity in medical law.
Demonstrates appellate courts’ role in interpreting statutory and common law principles.
Case 5: R v. Howe [1987]
Court: Court of Appeal
Facts:
Appellants argued they were coerced into committing murder.
Appeal:
Claimed duress should absolve them of murder liability.
Judgment:
Court of Appeal rejected appeal, establishing duress is not a defense for murder.
Significance:
Clarified the scope of duress in criminal law.
Shows appellate courts’ authority to set binding precedents.
Case 6: Re B (Children) [2008]
Court: Court of Appeal (Family Law Appeal)
Facts:
Dispute over custody of severely disabled child and treatment decisions.
Appeal:
Appeal challenged High Court decision allowing withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment.
Judgment:
Court of Appeal upheld lower court decision, emphasizing best interest of the child.
Significance:
Demonstrates civil/family appeals and judicial review in ethical matters.
Shows appellate courts balance legal principles, ethics, and evidence.
🧾 3. Key Takeaways
Appeals to the Court of Appeal are central to correcting errors, clarifying law, and protecting rights.
Appellate courts review facts, law, and procedure.
Both civil and criminal cases can be appealed, with appellate reasoning often setting precedents.
Cases like Donoghue v. Stevenson and R v. Jogee show appellate courts can overturn legal doctrines.
Appellate courts also balance public policy, ethics, and legal principles in their judgments.
RELATED Blog
comments