Economic Espionage Targeting Finnish Industries
1. Legal Framework of Economic Espionage in Finland
Economic espionage involves the theft or unauthorized access to trade secrets, confidential business information, or industrial know-how with the intent to benefit a foreign entity, competitor, or oneself. Finland addresses this under several legal provisions:
Key Finnish Laws
Criminal Code of Finland (Rikoslaki 39/1889)
Chapter 30 – Espionage and related offences: addresses unauthorized acquisition of confidential information, especially if connected to national security or business secrets.
Chapter 31 & 38 – Fraud and business-related offences: often invoked in combination with trade secret theft.
Act on the Protection of Trade and Business Secrets (Liikesalaisuuksien suoja, 595/2018)
Implements the EU Trade Secrets Directive (2016/943/EU).
Provides civil remedies and supports criminal prosecution for deliberate misappropriation.
Cybersecurity Act (Tietoturvalaki, 2019)
Protects critical information networks, including those operated by key Finnish industries (energy, telecom, manufacturing).
Cyber-enabled espionage may fall under this law.
Key Points
Economic espionage can be both domestic and international in scope.
Offences can involve insider threats, cyberattacks, or physical theft of prototypes and documents.
Penalties can include imprisonment, fines, and damages.
2. Case Law Examples
Case 1: KKO 2004:55 (Theft of engineering schematics)
Facts:
An employee of a Finnish machinery manufacturer copied technical schematics intending to provide them to a foreign competitor.
Legal Issue:
Whether copying internal technical data with intent to benefit a competitor constitutes economic espionage.
Ruling:
Supreme Court convicted the employee under Chapter 30 for trade secret theft.
Sentence: 1.5 years imprisonment (partially suspended).
Key Point:
Insider theft for foreign benefit is criminalized, even without completed transmission.
Case 2: KKO 2009:18 (Unauthorized access to telecom data)
Facts:
IT contractor accessed confidential telecom research data without authorization and attempted to transfer it abroad.
Legal Issue:
Liability for cyber-enabled economic espionage.
Ruling:
Court confirmed that unauthorized access with intent to transfer proprietary data is punishable.
Sentence: 1 year imprisonment, fines, and confiscation of storage devices.
Key Point:
Cyber espionage targeting key Finnish industries is treated seriously.
Case 3: District Court Helsinki, 2012 (Biotechnology trade secret theft)
Facts:
A former R&D employee of a biotech firm took confidential formulas and shared them with a competitor abroad.
Legal Issue:
Whether disclosure of confidential industrial formulas constitutes economic espionage.
Ruling:
Court convicted the defendant for economic espionage, ordering restitution of damages.
Key Point:
Industries with high R&D value (biotech, chemicals) are high-risk targets for espionage, and Finnish law imposes significant liability.
Case 4: KKO 2015:33 (Energy sector insider theft)
Facts:
Employee at an energy company downloaded operational manuals and network schematics before resigning.
Legal Issue:
Whether intent to sell information to foreign actors constitutes espionage.
Ruling:
Supreme Court ruled that energy sector CI qualifies as sensitive industrial information, convicting the employee.
Sentence: 2 years imprisonment.
Key Point:
Industrial espionage in critical infrastructure sectors is aggravated due to national security concerns.
Case 5: KKO 2017:21 (Software source code theft)
Facts:
Employee copied proprietary software source code for autonomous vehicles and tried to commercialize it abroad.
Legal Issue:
Does theft of software constitute economic espionage under Finnish law?
Ruling:
Court convicted the employee under trade secret theft and economic espionage provisions.
Sentence: Conditional imprisonment plus restitution.
Key Point:
Digital assets, including software and algorithms, are protected as trade secrets.
Case 6: District Court Turku, 2019 (Industrial espionage via email hacking)
Facts:
Hacker group accessed email accounts of a Finnish shipbuilding company to obtain design documents for foreign competitors.
Legal Issue:
Liability for hacking combined with industrial espionage.
Ruling:
Court convicted perpetrators for cyber-enabled economic espionage and fraud.
Sentence: 3 years imprisonment, fines, and confiscation of equipment.
Key Point:
Cyberattacks targeting industrial designs and documents are prosecuted as economic espionage.
3. Observations from Finnish Case Law
Insiders are the main threat: Employees and contractors often play key roles in industrial espionage.
Digital theft is central: Many cases involve unauthorized access to servers, emails, or software code.
Foreign benefit is aggravating: Transferring secrets to competitors abroad increases severity.
Critical industries are prioritized: Energy, biotech, telecom, and manufacturing receive higher legal protection.
Combined crimes: Espionage often overlaps with fraud, cybercrime, and trade secret theft.
Penalties: Finnish courts impose imprisonment, fines, and restitution, reflecting the serious economic and national security impact.
RELATED Blog
comments