Dna Profiling In Criminal Trials
What is DNA Profiling?
DNA profiling (also called genetic fingerprinting) is a forensic technique used to identify individuals based on their unique DNA patterns. Every individual’s DNA sequence (except identical twins) is unique, making it a powerful tool in criminal investigations.
How DNA Profiling Works in Criminal Trials:
Collection: DNA samples are collected from the crime scene (blood, hair, skin cells, saliva, etc.).
Extraction & Analysis: DNA is extracted and analyzed for specific regions known as STRs (Short Tandem Repeats).
Comparison: The DNA profile from the crime scene is compared to that of suspects or databases.
Matching: A match can conclusively link a suspect to the crime scene or exclude them.
Evidence in Court: DNA profiling evidence is presented to the court to support prosecution or defense.
Importance of DNA Profiling in Criminal Trials
Highly Reliable Evidence: Scientific and objective, reducing human errors.
Exonerates the Innocent: Has helped overturn wrongful convictions.
Links Suspects to Crimes: Even when no eyewitnesses are available.
Establishes Identity: When victims or suspects are unknown.
Landmark Cases in DNA Profiling and Their Impact
1. The People v. Castro (1989) – United States
Context: The first major U.S. appellate case involving DNA evidence.
Details: Castro was charged with murder based on circumstantial evidence. DNA evidence was introduced to confirm his presence at the crime scene.
Outcome: The court scrutinized the scientific validity of DNA testing, emphasizing the need for rigorous standards in presenting DNA evidence.
Impact: Established the foundation for admissibility standards of DNA evidence (Daubert standard later) and showed that DNA could be powerful but needed proper handling.
2. R v. Doheny and Adams (1997) – United Kingdom
Context: Early UK case dealing with DNA evidence.
Details: The prosecution relied heavily on DNA evidence linking the accused to the crime scene.
Outcome: The court emphasized the necessity to explain the statistical probabilities and the method used clearly to the jury.
Impact: Established that courts must carefully consider the weight and presentation of DNA evidence, particularly the statistics involved.
3. State of Florida v. Gary Dotson (1989) – United States
Context: A pivotal case where DNA profiling was used to overturn a conviction.
Details: Dotson was convicted of rape, but after DNA testing was introduced years later, it excluded him as the source of semen evidence.
Outcome: Dotson’s conviction was overturned, and he was released after 10 years in prison.
Impact: One of the first instances where DNA evidence was used to prove actual innocence, highlighting its role in correcting wrongful convictions.
4. People v. Wesley (1993) – California, USA
Context: A case where DNA evidence played a crucial role in establishing guilt.
Details: DNA from the crime scene matched the defendant’s profile.
Outcome: The DNA evidence was critical in securing a conviction.
Impact: Helped cement the use of DNA profiling as a key forensic tool in the prosecution’s arsenal.
5. Kirk Bloodsworth Case (1985) – United States
Context: The first American sentenced to death to be exonerated by DNA evidence.
Details: Bloodsworth was convicted of rape and murder and sentenced to death.
Outcome: Post-conviction DNA testing proved he was not the perpetrator.
Impact: A landmark in the use of DNA to prevent miscarriages of justice, influencing policies on post-conviction DNA testing.
6. Naveen Singh Case (India, 2010)
Context: One of the earliest cases in India where DNA profiling played a key role.
Details: DNA evidence was used to establish that the accused was not involved in a murder case, despite circumstantial evidence against him.
Outcome: The accused was acquitted based on DNA profiling evidence.
Impact: Helped introduce DNA profiling in Indian courts and emphasized the role of science in criminal justice.
Summary of Case Law Lessons:
Admissibility: Courts require strict scientific validation of DNA methods (People v. Castro).
Statistical Explanation: Probability and statistics behind DNA matches must be clearly explained to juries (R v. Doheny).
Innocence: DNA evidence can exonerate wrongly convicted individuals (Dotson, Bloodsworth).
Conviction Support: DNA profiling can firmly link suspects to crimes (Wesley).
Legal Acceptance: DNA evidence is now globally recognized as a cornerstone in forensic investigations.
Conclusion
DNA profiling revolutionized criminal justice by providing objective, reliable evidence that could identify or exclude suspects with high precision. It has played a pivotal role in both convicting the guilty and freeing the innocent, fundamentally reshaping trial procedures and forensic science standards worldwide.
RELATED Blog
0 comments