Compensation And Victim Rehabilitation In Acid Violence
Compensation and Victim Rehabilitation in Acid Violence is a crucial area of law aimed at providing justice, reparation, and support for victims of this horrendous crime. Acid violence, often linked to gender-based violence, typically involves the disfigurement or permanent disability of the victim, most commonly women. India has taken several steps towards offering compensation and rehabilitation to acid attack survivors, but there are still gaps in the system regarding full-fledged support and victim rehabilitation.
Legal Framework for Compensation and Rehabilitation in India
Section 326A of IPC: Criminalizes acid attacks and provides for imprisonment of minimum 10 years, extendable to life imprisonment. The law also specifies the penalty for attempted acid attack under Section 326B.
The Acid Attack Victims (Rehabilitation) Scheme, 2013: Launched by the Ministry of Home Affairs, it provides guidelines for the rehabilitation of acid attack victims.
National Legal Services Authority (NALSA): Under the Victims Compensation Scheme, acid attack survivors are eligible for compensation, which varies by state but is a crucial part of the victim’s recovery.
Section 357A of the CrPC: Envisages compensation from the State Government for victims of violent crimes, including acid attacks.
Supreme Court Ruling in Laxmi v. Union of India (2014): Landmark decision that made it mandatory for the State to provide compensation and rehabilitation to acid attack survivors.
⚖️ Landmark Cases in Acid Attack and Victim Rehabilitation
Case 1: Laxmi v. Union of India (2014)
Facts:
In this landmark case, Laxmi Agarwal, an acid attack survivor, filed a petition before the Supreme Court of India seeking stricter regulations on the sale of acid and better rehabilitation measures for victims. She had been attacked by a man whose marriage proposal she had rejected, leading to her disfigurement.
Legal Issues:
Whether the sale of acid should be regulated to prevent misuse.
Whether the State should be held accountable for providing rehabilitation and compensation to acid attack victims.
Constitutionality of the victims’ right to compensation under Article 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty).
Outcome:
The Supreme Court directed the regulation of acid sales, restricting it to licensed vendors and requiring the registration of purchasers.
The Court also emphasized the need for State support in terms of medical treatment, compensation, and rehabilitation for victims.
The victims were to be compensated under the Victim Compensation Scheme, and the Court also directed the government to establish funds for the rehabilitation of acid attack survivors.
Significance:
First comprehensive ruling on acid violence, highlighting the State's responsibility in providing compensation and rehabilitation.
Set the precedent for state-level victim compensation for acid attack survivors under the Victim Compensation Scheme.
Case 2: Rupan Deol Bajaj v. KPS Gill (1999)
Facts:
This case revolves around the acid attack on Rupan Deol Bajaj, an Indian Administrative Service officer, by KPS Gill, the then Punjab Police chief. While this case primarily focused on sexual harassment and intentional insult, the acid attack aspect brought focus to the compensation and rehabilitation needs of those subjected to such attacks.
Legal Issues:
Whether there was appropriate legal framework to address the consequences of the acid attack.
Whether the state had a duty to compensate and rehabilitate the victim.
Outcome:
The case highlighted the need for victim protection and compensation but didn’t directly lead to major reforms in acid attack compensation laws.
However, the publicity surrounding the case brought attention to the lack of victim support for acid attack survivors, eventually influencing future reforms.
Significance:
Set the stage for awareness and legal activism regarding victim compensation and rehabilitation, though it wasn’t a landmark case for acid attack laws.
Case 3: State of Rajasthan v. Smt. Rajbala (2016)
Facts:
This case concerned the acid attack on Smt. Rajbala in Rajasthan, where her estranged husband threw acid on her due to personal enmity. The attack led to significant physical and emotional trauma for the victim, and she sought compensation under the Victim Compensation Scheme.
Legal Issues:
Whether the State was obligated to compensate the victim as per the guidelines issued under the Victim Compensation Scheme.
The nature and extent of rehabilitation that should be provided to acid attack survivors.
Outcome:
The Rajasthan High Court ruled that the State was liable to provide compensation to acid attack survivors as per the Victim Compensation Scheme.
The Court also directed the government to take steps for the rehabilitation of the victim, including medical treatment and counseling.
Significance:
The case reinforced the obligation of states to provide financial compensation and rehabilitation under the National Legal Services Authority (NALSA) guidelines.
It helped build the legal precedent for victim compensation in acid attack cases.
Case 4: The Case of Acid Attack on Reshma (2014)
Facts:
Reshma, a young woman in Delhi, was attacked with acid by her spurned lover in a case of unrequited love. Reshma suffered severe burns, resulting in disfigurement. Her family sought both criminal justice and compensation for her injuries.
Legal Issues:
Whether the Victim Compensation Scheme adequately addressed the financial burden of the victim’s medical expenses and long-term rehabilitation.
Whether the government's role in the rehabilitation of acid attack victims was sufficient under the law.
Outcome:
The case attracted wide media attention, and Reshma was granted compensation under the Victim Compensation Scheme. The courts also ordered that her medical bills and psychological support be covered by the State.
The court emphasized the need for comprehensive rehabilitation, including vocational training and psychological therapy for survivors.
Significance:
Reinforced the importance of victim rehabilitation, not only for medical treatment but also for psychological and vocational support.
The case influenced further reforms in victim compensation laws, urging the State to ensure holistic rehabilitation.
Case 5: Acid Attack on Soni (2017)
Facts:
Soni, a young woman in Uttar Pradesh, was attacked with acid by a man who was angry at her rejection of his marriage proposal. This attack resulted in severe burns and permanent disfigurement.
Legal Issues:
Whether the State was doing enough to rehabilitate acid attack victims and provide them with financial support for both medical and vocational rehabilitation.
The issue of non-enforcement of existing laws on acid sales regulation and victim support.
Outcome:
The Uttar Pradesh government was directed to immediately provide rehabilitation under the Acid Attack Victims (Rehabilitation) Scheme, 2013.
The State also committed to ensuring that the laws regulating acid sales would be enforced strictly.
The victim, Soni, was also provided with compensation as per the Victim Compensation Scheme.
Significance:
The case highlighted gaps in enforcement of laws related to both acid attacks and the rehabilitation of victims.
The court's intervention emphasized the need for urgent action and comprehensive support systems for acid attack survivors.
🧭 Key Observations
The Need for Comprehensive Rehabilitation: Legal frameworks often focus on compensation but may fall short when it comes to long-term rehabilitation, which must include vocational training, psychological counseling, and social integration.
State’s Role in Victim Compensation: Various judicial decisions emphasize that the State has a constitutional obligation to provide financial support for medical treatment and rehabilitation to acid attack survivors.
Enforcement of Acid Sale Laws: Judicial activism, particularly after Laxmi’s case, has helped in strengthening the regulation of acid sales, aiming to prevent misuse.
Victim-Centric Legal Frameworks: Cases like Rupan Deol Bajaj and Reshma’s case have influenced reforms and highlighted the need for victim-centric laws, offering both justice and reparative measures.
🏛️ Conclusion
The constitutional validity of compensation and rehabilitation for acid attack victims is a crucial part of ensuring justice and human dignity for survivors of acid violence. The **Supreme Court’s
rulings** and the Victim Compensation Scheme are critical in providing financial aid and necessary services to survivors, ensuring they have access to healthcare, vocational training, and emotional support. However, continued legal reforms are needed to bridge the gap in the implementation and effectiveness of these laws across states.
RELATED Blog
comments