Excessive Force Prosecutions In State Courts
What is Excessive Force?
Excessive force occurs when law enforcement officers use more physical force than reasonably necessary to perform their duties, particularly in arrests, searches, or crowd control. Excessive force can violate both state criminal laws and constitutional rights.
Legal Framework
Most states have criminal statutes addressing assault, battery, or official misconduct by law enforcement officers.
Excessive force can lead to charges like assault on a peace officer, official misconduct, manslaughter or murder if it results in death.
State courts apply reasonableness standards, often paralleling federal 4th Amendment excessive force analysis but through state criminal law.
Key Elements in Excessive Force Prosecutions
Use of physical force by an officer
Force was unreasonable or unnecessary under the circumstances
The force caused injury or death
Intent or recklessness may vary by charge
Detailed Case Law
Case 1: State v. Goetz (New York, 1986)
Facts:
Bernhard Goetz shot four young men on a subway after they allegedly tried to mug him.
Legal Issue:
Was Goetz’s use of deadly force justified or excessive?
Outcome:
He was acquitted of attempted murder charges, found guilty of illegal possession of a firearm.
Significance:
Though involving a private citizen, this case shaped the “reasonable person” standard for use of force in New York state courts.
Case 2: People v. Ortega (California, 2012)
Facts:
Officer Ortega was charged after using a Taser multiple times on a restrained suspect.
Charges:
Excessive force causing bodily injury.
Outcome:
Convicted of misdemeanor excessive force; sentenced to probation.
Significance:
Highlights criminal liability for excessive use of non-lethal force, even when suspect is restrained.
Case 3: Commonwealth v. Torres (Massachusetts, 2016)
Facts:
Officer Torres used chokehold on a suspect leading to serious injury.
Charges:
Assault and battery by a public official.
Outcome:
Convicted; sentenced to jail and probation.
Significance:
Demonstrates state prosecution of excessive force involving potentially lethal holds.
Case 4: State v. Lemon (Ohio, 2019)
Facts:
Officer Lemon was charged for using excessive physical force resulting in death during an arrest.
Charges:
Felony involuntary manslaughter.
Outcome:
Convicted; sentenced to several years in prison.
Significance:
Shows that officers can face serious felony charges for excessive force resulting in death.
Case 5: People v. Green (Illinois, 2015)
Facts:
Police officer Green struck a suspect with a baton after suspect was handcuffed.
Charges:
Aggravated battery by a public official.
Outcome:
Convicted and sentenced to prison.
Significance:
Establishes that force after detention can be prosecuted as a criminal offense.
Case 6: State v. Wilson (Texas, 2020)
Facts:
Officer Wilson used a stun gun on a compliant suspect multiple times.
Charges:
Abuse of official capacity and assault.
Outcome:
Convicted; sentenced to jail and community service.
Significance:
Texas courts have prosecuted officers for abuse of power through excessive force even when the suspect is not resisting.
Summary of Legal Principles
Excessive force prosecutions depend on whether force used was reasonable given the circumstances.
States vary, but many allow prosecution for assault, battery, manslaughter, or official misconduct.
The standard often considers whether a reasonable officer would use such force.
Criminal liability can include misdemeanors or felonies based on injury severity.
Evidence often includes video recordings, eyewitness testimony, and medical reports.
Conclusion
Excessive force prosecutions in state courts aim to hold law enforcement accountable for unjustified physical violence. While standards may mirror federal constitutional analysis, state laws provide specific criminal remedies. Courts carefully weigh the facts, focusing on reasonableness and injury, and convictions can result in substantial penalties, reinforcing legal limits on police conduct.
RELATED Blog
0 comments