Illegal Mining And Resource Exploitation
Meaning
Illegal mining refers to the extraction of minerals without lawful authority, in violation of mining laws, environmental regulations, land rights, or royalty/taxation rules. It often involves:
Mining without a valid license or lease
Excess extraction beyond permitted limits
Mining in prohibited areas (forest areas, wildlife sanctuaries, riverbeds, tribal land)
Non-payment of royalties or environmental compensation
Use of child labour or hazardous methods
Smuggling or illegal transportation of minerals
Why It Is a Serious Problem
Environmental Damage
Deforestation, soil erosion, loss of biodiversity
Water pollution due to sand and mineral removal
Land degradation and air pollution
Loss of Government Revenue
Huge losses from unpaid royalties and taxes
Illegal mineral trade funding organized criminal networks
Violation of Rights of Indigenous/Local Communities
Displacement
Loss of livelihood
Threats to tribal forest rights
Safety and Human Rights Issues
Unregulated mines cause frequent accidents and deaths
Labour exploitation, including use of children
Key Legal Provisions (India-based framework explained)
Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (MMDR Act)
Forest Conservation Act, 1980
Environment Protection Act, 1986
Indian Penal Code (for theft, criminal conspiracy, etc.)
Wildlife Protection Act, 1972
Supreme Court and High Court Environmental Jurisprudence
⚖️ Major Case Laws on Illegal Mining (More than Five, in Detailed Form)
1. Samaj Parivartana Samudaya v. State of Karnataka (2013) – Bellary Illegal Mining Case
Court: Supreme Court of India
Background
Bellary district in Karnataka witnessed massive illegal iron ore mining. Miners extracted far beyond permissible limits, encroached forest areas, manipulated permits, and caused large-scale ecological destruction.
Key Findings
Mining companies violated forest laws, environmental laws, and mining regulations.
Illegal extraction and export led to enormous loss of public revenue.
Government officials were complicit.
Judgment Highlights
Supreme Court banned all mining in Bellary, Tumkur, and Chitradurga districts temporarily.
Ordered reclamation and rehabilitation (R&R) plans.
Permitted only “Category A” mines to resume after compliance.
Ordered sale of confiscated iron ore through a court-monitored auction.
Significance
A landmark judgment demonstrating how judicial intervention can stop large-scale illegal mining and ensure sustainable practices.
2. T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India (Forest Case Series, 1996–ongoing)
Court: Supreme Court
Background
This case initially concerned forest protection but expanded to include illegal mining in forest areas across India.
Key Findings
Mining in forest land without prior approval under the Forest Conservation Act is illegal.
State governments failed to control encroachment and mining activities in protected zones.
Judgment Highlights
Imposed complete ban on mining in certain forest regions until clearance was obtained.
Set up the Forest Advisory Committee (FAC) for forest diversion scrutiny.
Emphasized “sustainable development” and “precautionary principle”.
Significance
Created foundational jurisprudence linking mining activities with forest conservation.
3. M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (Aravalli Hills Mining Case, 2002 & 2009)
Court: Supreme Court
Background
Illegal mining in the Aravalli hills (Haryana and Rajasthan) caused severe ecological imbalance and groundwater loss.
Key Findings
Mining operators violated environmental clearances.
Illegal sand and stone mining destroyed natural landscape and forest cover.
Judgment Highlights
Supreme Court banned all mining in Aravalli hills in affected areas.
Ordered recovery of damage compensation from defaulting miners.
Directed rehabilitation to restore ecological balance.
Significance
A major case protecting fragile ecosystems from illegal mining and setting standards for restoration.
4. State of Gujarat v. Narmada Cement Co. Ltd. – Sand Mining on Riverbeds
Court: Supreme Court
Background
Unregulated sand mining on riverbeds led to riverbank erosion and ecological harm.
Judgment Highlights
The Court held that sand is a mineral under the MMDR Act.
Mining leases are mandatory even for riverbed sand removal.
Any extraction without lease amounts to illegal mining and theft of government property.
Significance
Clarified that all mineral extraction—even “common” minerals like sand—requires legal authorization.
5. Goa Foundation v. Union of India (2014) – Goa Iron Ore Mining Scam
Court: Supreme Court
Background
Over 95 mining leases in Goa were operating illegally after expiry. Massive environmental violations occurred, including extraction beyond permitted limits and illegal exports.
Key Findings
Mining after March 2007 was illegal due to lack of renewed leases.
Government exceeded powers by granting illegal renewals.
Environmental damage was severe and irreversible in some zones.
Judgment Highlights
Supreme Court cancelled all 88 mining leases in Goa.
Mandated fresh environmental clearances.
Capped extraction at 20 million tonnes per annum to protect ecology.
Significance
Stopped one of the biggest mining scams in India and established stricter mine lease renewal standards.
6. Common Cause v. Union of India (2017) – Odisha Illegal Mining Case
Court: Supreme Court
Background
Mining companies in Odisha were extracting iron and manganese ore without proper environmental clearance or exceeding capacity limits.
Key Findings
Violations of mining plans, lack of environmental clearance, and excess extraction.
Companies earned huge profits illegally.
Judgment Highlights
Supreme Court imposed 100% penalty on miners for illegally extracted minerals.
Directed recovery of ₹17,500 crore from violators (approx.).
Stressed that illegal mining is “plunder of national wealth”.
Significance
Strongest financial penalty ever imposed for illegal mining; a deterrent for future violators.
7. Deepak Kumar v. State of Haryana (2012) – Minor Minerals Case
Court: Supreme Court
Background
States were allowing sand and minor mineral mining up to 5 hectares without environmental clearance.
Judgment Highlights
Court held that environmental clearance is required even for small-scale mining.
Rejected the argument that small mines cause less impact.
Brought minor minerals (like sand) under stricter environmental regulation.
Significance
One of the most important judgments controlling illegal sand mining across India.
Conclusion
Illegal mining is a serious issue causing environmental destruction, economic loss, and social harm. Courts in India have played a crucial role in:
Stopping illegal operations
Imposing heavy penalties
Directing rehabilitation
Ensuring sustainable mining practices
The above cases collectively form the backbone of Indian environmental and mining jurisprudence.
RELATED Blog
0 comments