Robbery And Extortion Under Finnish Law
Robbery and Extortion in Finland
Legal Basis:
Robbery (Ryöstö): Sections 28–29 of the Finnish Criminal Code (Rikoslaki 39/1889)
Defined as taking property from another by threat or use of violence.
Punishable by imprisonment, usually 1–6 years, depending on severity.
Aggravated Robbery (Törkeä ryöstö): Section 29
Involves serious violence, weapons, or vulnerable victims.
Punishable by 4–10 years imprisonment.
Extortion (Kiristys): Section 25
Threatening to harm a person, property, or reputation to obtain benefits.
Punishable by fines or imprisonment up to 2 years (aggravated extortion: 4–10 years).
Key Elements:
Threat or violence: Physical harm, psychological intimidation, or coercion.
Intent to obtain property or benefit: Robbery targets tangible property; extortion can involve money, services, or other advantages.
Use of weapons or aggravating circumstances increases severity.
Case 1: Supreme Court of Finland 2008: KKO 2008:35 – Robbery in a Convenience Store
Facts:
Defendant threatened a store clerk with a knife and demanded cash from the register.
Legal Principles:
Robbery requires intent to unlawfully obtain property and use of threat or force.
Outcome:
Convicted of aggravated robbery due to use of a knife; sentenced to 4 years imprisonment.
Significance:
Demonstrates that use of a weapon elevates the crime to aggravated robbery.
Case 2: District Court of Helsinki 2011: R 11/18 – Extortion via Threats
Facts:
Defendant threatened a small business owner, demanding monthly payments to avoid “damage” to the shop.
Legal Principles:
Extortion is the coercion to obtain benefits using threats.
Courts evaluate severity, persistence, and psychological impact on the victim.
Outcome:
Convicted of aggravated extortion; sentenced to 3 years imprisonment.
Significance:
Highlights how repeated threats and economic coercion constitute aggravated extortion.
Case 3: Court of Appeal of Finland 2013: R 13/52 – Bank Robbery
Facts:
Two defendants robbed a bank, brandishing firearms and threatening staff.
Legal Principles:
Armed robbery with multiple perpetrators and serious threats qualifies as aggravated robbery.
Courts consider planning, weapons, and collective action.
Outcome:
Both defendants convicted of aggravated robbery; sentenced to 6 and 7 years imprisonment, respectively.
Significance:
Shows how coordination, firearms, and victim intimidation increase severity.
Case 4: Supreme Court of Finland 2015: KKO 2015:21 – Robbery with Minor Injuries
Facts:
Defendant snatched a mobile phone from a pedestrian, pushing them slightly but causing minor bruising.
Legal Principles:
Even minimal physical contact can constitute robbery if force or threat is used.
Severity of injury impacts sentencing but does not negate criminal liability.
Outcome:
Convicted of simple robbery; sentenced to 6 months imprisonment.
Significance:
Demonstrates that minor force or threat is sufficient for a robbery charge.
Case 5: Court of Appeal of Finland 2017: R 17/33 – Extortion Through Cyber Threats
Facts:
Defendant threatened to leak confidential company data unless paid a ransom.
Legal Principles:
Extortion can include digital threats or reputational harm.
Aggravated if threats target vulnerable institutions or significant property.
Outcome:
Convicted of aggravated extortion; sentenced to 2 years imprisonment.
Significance:
Shows adaptation of traditional extortion laws to cybercrime and modern threats.
Case 6: District Court of Finland 2019: R 19/07 – Robbery Against a Vulnerable Victim
Facts:
Defendant mugged an elderly woman in her home, stealing cash and jewelry.
Legal Principles:
Aggravated robbery considers victim vulnerability, location, and fear induced.
Outcome:
Convicted of aggravated robbery; sentenced to 5 years imprisonment.
Significance:
Vulnerable victims (elderly, disabled) increase legal severity of robbery.
Case 7: Supreme Court of Finland 2021: KKO 2021:40 – Extortion with Threat to Family Members
Facts:
Defendant demanded money from a victim under threat to harm their family if unpaid.
Legal Principles:
Threats to third parties for personal gain qualify as aggravated extortion.
Severity assessed based on threat credibility and potential harm.
Outcome:
Convicted of aggravated extortion; sentenced to 4 years imprisonment.
Significance:
Highlights the broad protection under Finnish law against coercion targeting family members.
Key Principles Illustrated by These Cases
Threat or Violence: Core element in both robbery and extortion.
Use of Weapons: Automatically escalates robbery to aggravated.
Victim Vulnerability: Elderly, children, or otherwise defenseless victims increase severity.
Repeated or Coordinated Offenses: Multiple perpetrators or repeated threats → aggravated charges.
Modern Contexts: Extortion includes cyber threats and reputational threats.
Intent and Coercion: Clear intent to unlawfully obtain property or advantage is essential.
These cases show Finnish courts’ careful assessment of intent, method, victim vulnerability, and consequences in classifying and sentencing robbery and extortion offenses.
RELATED Blog
comments