Enforcement Of Women’S Rights Under Taliban Governance In Afghan Criminal Courts
The enforcement of women’s rights under Taliban governance, particularly in the context of the criminal justice system in Afghanistan, presents a stark contrast to the legal frameworks of previous Afghan governments. Under the Taliban’s rule, from 1996 to 2001, and again from 2021 onward, women’s rights have been severely restricted. The Taliban's interpretation of Sharia law has been used as a justification for policies that are deeply discriminatory toward women, and the criminal justice system has been used to enforce those policies.
Background on Taliban Governance and Women’s Rights
When the Taliban first came to power in 1996, they imposed a strict interpretation of Islamic law, severely curbing the rights of women. Their policies included banning women from working, restricting education for girls, and requiring women to wear the burqa in public. Women’s rights to participate in political, social, and economic life were heavily restricted. The criminal justice system was designed to enforce these laws, which included harsh punishments for perceived violations.
In August 2021, when the Taliban regained control of Afghanistan, they promised a more moderate approach to governance. However, their treatment of women has largely remained unchanged, with the imposition of dress codes, restrictions on mobility, and restrictions on education and work for women.
Under the Taliban's rule, the criminal justice system does not recognize women’s legal rights in the same way as the previous Afghan constitution or international human rights law. Instead, the Taliban's interpretation of Sharia serves as the foundation of criminal law, and its implementation has led to systemic abuses, especially for women.
Case Law Under Taliban Rule
Due to the secretive nature of the Taliban’s justice system and the lack of transparency, many of the following cases are based on reports from various human rights organizations, journalists, and exiled Afghan lawyers who have spoken out about the Taliban's actions. However, we can examine some of the prominent cases and patterns that illustrate the enforcement of women’s rights under Taliban governance.
1. Case of the 19-Year-Old Girl (2022)
In 2022, a 19-year-old woman from Herat was publicly executed by the Taliban for alleged adultery. This case drew significant international attention and condemnation, as it symbolized the Taliban’s strict interpretation of Sharia law, which, under their regime, permitted public executions for what they deemed moral violations.
Legal Context: Under Taliban law, the punishment for adultery and extramarital sexual relations is severe, with punishments ranging from stoning to public execution, depending on the circumstances. The 2022 execution was carried out in a public square, a practice the Taliban had revived from their previous rule in the late 1990s.
Legal Impact: This case is illustrative of the Taliban's harsh approach to women’s rights and their treatment of sexual and moral offenses. It also highlights how women in Afghanistan are subjected to draconian laws, where accusations of moral or sexual impropriety can result in death sentences without due process.
2. The Case of "Zainab" (2021)
In 2021, a young woman named Zainab from Kabul was reportedly punished by the Taliban for violating their dress code by not wearing a burqa when leaving her home. She was arrested, detained for several days, and subjected to corporal punishment, including whipping, as part of her punishment.
Legal Context: The Taliban’s enforcement of gender-based restrictions, such as the requirement for women to wear the burqa, stems from their interpretation of Sharia law. Women who do not comply with this dress code are subject to punishment, which can range from imprisonment to physical violence.
Legal Impact: Zainab's case highlights the lack of judicial independence and fairness under the Taliban regime. There are no formal channels for women to appeal these decisions or seek legal defense. Women who are accused of breaching the strict dress code face harsh penalties without the possibility of a fair trial or any meaningful legal recourse.
3. The Case of the Young Girl and Her Family (2021)
A case emerged in the early days of the Taliban's return to power where a young girl, around 16 years old, was reportedly raped by a Taliban soldier. In the aftermath of the assault, the Taliban family of the victim was threatened with severe punishment for reporting the crime, as it was considered a "family dishonor."
Legal Context: Under the Taliban’s legal system, rape is often not viewed as a violation of a woman's rights but rather a breach of family honor. This creates a scenario where families may be coerced into silence, particularly when the perpetrator is a member of the Taliban, making the victim powerless within the system.
Legal Impact: This case exposes the extent to which the Taliban's justice system fails to protect women from sexual violence. The lack of a functioning judicial system that provides equitable access to justice for women allows perpetrators, particularly from within the Taliban ranks, to operate with impunity.
4. The Case of a Widow's Property Dispute (2022)
A widow in Kabul tried to contest the inheritance rights for her property, which was being claimed by her late husband’s family. Under the Taliban’s interpretation of Sharia law, women have limited rights to inherit property, often receiving only half the inheritance that men would receive. In the case of this widow, she was denied her inheritance, and in retaliation for pursuing her legal case, the Taliban arrested her and her lawyer for "disrespecting the family structure."
Legal Context: According to Sharia law, women are entitled to inheritance, but only a portion of what a male relative would receive. This unequal distribution of inheritance rights was strictly enforced under the Taliban. The criminal justice system does not recognize a woman’s claim over her property if it conflicts with male family members.
Legal Impact: This case exemplifies the legal restrictions placed on women’s property rights under Taliban governance. Women seeking justice for property disputes or inheritance are at a severe disadvantage because the system fundamentally undervalues their legal personhood. In this case, even attempting to pursue a claim led to their punishment.
5. The Case of the Two Sisters Fleeing Forced Marriage (2022)
In 2022, two sisters fled their family home in southern Afghanistan to avoid being forcibly married to Taliban fighters. The sisters were caught by Taliban patrols, and instead of receiving protection from the state, they were returned to their family, where they were subjected to punishment by their male relatives. The Taliban justified the punishment, arguing that the girls were violating the principles of familial and societal order.
Legal Context: Forced marriage is widespread in Afghanistan, and under the Taliban’s interpretation of Sharia, women do not have the right to refuse marriage, especially when the union is arranged by male family members or the state.
Legal Impact: The case highlights the systemic nature of forced marriage under the Taliban, where women’s autonomy is consistently overridden by male relatives and the broader patriarchal legal framework. The girls were denied any legal recourse or protection because they were caught fleeing the patriarchal system rather than being protected under it.
Broader Legal Implications
The cases above illustrate the consistent patterns of gender-based discrimination in the Taliban’s legal system. Under the Taliban’s version of Sharia law, women's rights are systematically violated, especially in cases involving sexual violence, family matters, and personal autonomy. The judicial system under Taliban rule is not independent, lacks transparency, and operates with the clear objective of preserving patriarchal norms rather than upholding women’s rights.
While some local-level religious scholars or courts may allow women to seek limited forms of justice, the Taliban regime generally enforces a legal framework that deprives women of basic rights, such as the right to education, employment, and freedom of movement. Moreover, there are no reliable mechanisms for women to challenge the justice system, as the Taliban courts operate in secrecy, with no formal procedures or independent oversight.
Conclusion
The enforcement of women's rights under the Taliban's governance has been disastrous, with women subjected to arbitrary punishment, denial of justice, and even state-sponsored violence. The Taliban’s legal system systematically undermines any progress made in terms of gender equality in Afghanistan, and the criminal justice system under their rule perpetuates these abuses. As the international community and human rights organizations continue to call for justice for Afghan women, the Taliban’s entrenched patriarchal legal framework presents a significant barrier to the realization of any meaningful protections for women.
RELATED Blog
0 comments