Felony Dui With Injury Prosecutions
📌 What is Felony DUI With Injury?
Driving under the influence (DUI) becomes a felony when the driver causes serious bodily injury or death to another person. Felony DUI prosecutions are more severe than misdemeanor DUI and often involve enhanced penalties, including imprisonment, fines, and license revocation.
⚖️ Key Elements for Felony DUI With Injury
To convict someone of felony DUI with injury, prosecutors generally must prove:
Driving Under the Influence: The defendant operated a vehicle while impaired by alcohol or drugs beyond the legal limit.
Causation: The defendant’s impaired driving caused an accident resulting in injury.
Serious Bodily Injury: The injury to the victim meets the statutory threshold (varies by jurisdiction but usually includes substantial risk, permanent disfigurement, or loss of a bodily function).
Mens Rea (Intent or Negligence): Usually, recklessness or criminal negligence is required.
⚖️ Key Case Law on Felony DUI With Injury
1. People v. Ochoa, 214 Cal.App.4th 1460 (2013)
Facts:
Defendant was charged with felony DUI causing injury after a car crash severely injured a pedestrian.
Legal Issue:
Whether the evidence sufficiently proved causation between DUI and injury.
Ruling:
The court upheld the conviction, finding that the prosecution met the burden to prove that DUI was a substantial factor in causing the injury.
Importance:
Clarified that causation requires DUI to be a substantial factor, not necessarily the sole cause.
Affirmed that injury severity meets felony threshold.
2. State v. McBride, 143 Wn.2d 190 (2001)
Facts:
Defendant caused injury while driving under the influence and was charged with felony DUI.
Legal Issue:
Whether “serious injury” requires permanent injury or substantial risk of death.
Ruling:
The Washington Supreme Court held that “serious injury” includes injuries that pose a substantial risk of death or cause serious permanent disfigurement.
Importance:
Established statutory interpretation of serious bodily injury in DUI cases.
Set precedent for injury severity in felony DUI prosecutions.
3. People v. Falkenstein, 56 Cal.4th 494 (2013)
Facts:
Defendant was charged with felony DUI causing injury after a collision resulting in injuries.
Legal Issue:
Whether the prosecution must prove the defendant was aware of the risk of injury.
Ruling:
Court held that proof of DUI and causation is sufficient; no need to prove specific awareness of injury risk for felony DUI.
Importance:
Emphasized that recklessness is inferred from driving impaired causing injury.
Lowered burden on prosecutors regarding mental state.
4. Commonwealth v. Rocca, 553 Pa. 129 (1998)
Facts:
Defendant caused injury while driving intoxicated and was charged with aggravated assault.
Legal Issue:
Whether DUI with injury can support aggravated assault charges.
Ruling:
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held DUI causing serious injury supports aggravated assault prosecution.
Importance:
Demonstrated that felony DUI can lead to additional charges like assault with a deadly weapon.
Expanded prosecutorial options in DUI injury cases.
5. State v. O’Neill, 239 Conn. 544 (1996)
Facts:
Defendant involved in DUI accident with injury challenged sufficiency of evidence.
Legal Issue:
Whether expert testimony is required to link intoxication to accident causation.
Ruling:
Court ruled expert testimony is not always necessary if circumstantial evidence sufficiently proves impairment caused the accident.
Importance:
Allowed courts to rely on common sense and circumstantial evidence in DUI injury cases.
Helped prosecutors prove causation without expert witnesses.
6. People v. Armendariz, 131 Cal.App.4th 1381 (2005)
Facts:
Defendant faced felony DUI causing injury after hitting a pedestrian.
Legal Issue:
Whether defendant’s refusal of blood alcohol testing affects prosecution.
Ruling:
Court upheld admission of refusal evidence as consciousness of guilt.
Importance:
Allowed use of chemical test refusal as evidence in DUI injury trials.
Encouraged compliance with DUI testing procedures.
🧾 Summary of Legal Principles from the Cases
| Legal Principle | Key Case | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| DUI must be a substantial cause of injury | People v. Ochoa | DUI doesn’t have to be sole cause but must substantially cause injury. |
| Serious injury includes permanent or life-threatening harm | State v. McBride | Injury threshold for felony includes serious permanent or fatal injuries. |
| Mental state inferred from DUI and injury | People v. Falkenstein | Recklessness inferred; no need to prove specific awareness of risk. |
| DUI causing injury can lead to assault charges | Commonwealth v. Rocca | Prosecution can bring additional charges like aggravated assault. |
| Expert testimony not always needed | State v. O’Neill | Circumstantial evidence can prove intoxication caused injury. |
| Refusal of blood testing admissible | People v. Armendariz | Test refusal can be used as evidence of guilt. |
🧩 Conclusion
Felony DUI with injury prosecutions focus on proving that the defendant was impaired and that impairment substantially caused serious bodily injury. Courts emphasize:
Causation: DUI must be a significant factor in causing injury.
Severity of injury: Injuries meeting serious bodily injury thresholds justify felony charges.
Mental state: Recklessness is often inferred from the facts; no specific intent to harm needed.
Evidence: Circumstantial evidence and refusal of testing can be powerful tools for prosecutors.
These cases provide a framework for understanding how felony DUI with injury prosecutions succeed and what defendants and attorneys must address.
RELATED Blog
0 comments