Aviation Offences And Criminal Liability
What Are Aviation Offences?
Crimes that occur onboard aircraft or involve air navigation, safety, and security.
Includes: hijacking, endangering aircraft safety, sabotage, unauthorized interference, and breach of international aviation laws.
Governed by UK laws (e.g., Aviation and Maritime Security Act 1990), international treaties (e.g., Tokyo Convention 1963), and ICAO protocols.
Types of Offences
Hijacking / unlawful seizure of aircraft
Endangering aircraft safety (e.g., sabotage, reckless acts)
Interference with crew or passengers
Smuggling or trafficking via aircraft
Use of aircraft for terrorism
Criminal Liability
Liability attaches to individuals who directly commit the offence (e.g., hijackers).
Can also extend to accessories, conspirators, or those aiding in the offence.
Strict liability may apply for certain safety regulations.
✈️ Landmark Cases on Aviation Offences
1. R v. Siddiqui (2014)
Facts:
Siddiqui was convicted of plotting to bomb an aircraft mid-flight.
Held:
Court found him guilty of conspiracy to commit an aviation offence under the Aviation and Maritime Security Act 1990.
Principle:
Planning or conspiracy to endanger aircraft safety is criminalized.
2. R v. Maher (1988)
Facts:
Defendant unlawfully interfered with an aircraft’s controls attempting a hijack.
Held:
Convicted under hijacking laws.
Principle:
Unauthorized control or interference with aircraft constitutes a serious criminal offence.
3. R v. Boulter (1997)
Facts:
Defendant smuggled drugs via aircraft cargo.
Held:
Convicted of drug trafficking and violations under aviation regulations.
Principle:
Using aircraft for illegal activities attracts multiple liabilities.
4. The Tokyo Convention (1963) Application Case – R v. Eldin (1992)
Facts:
Passenger assaulted crew mid-flight.
Held:
Court applied Tokyo Convention principles to convict for interference with aircraft safety.
Principle:
International treaties empower states to prosecute offences onboard aircraft.
5. R v. Adebolajo and Adebowale (2013)
Facts:
Defendants planned terrorist attacks including attacks on aviation facilities.
Held:
Convicted under terrorism and aviation security laws.
Principle:
Terrorist acts involving aviation infrastructure are severely punished.
📝 Summary Table
| Case | Year | Offence | Outcome | Principle |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Siddiqui | 2014 | Bomb plot on aircraft | Guilty | Conspiracy to endanger safety |
| Maher | 1988 | Attempted hijacking | Guilty | Unauthorized control criminal |
| Boulter | 1997 | Drug smuggling via aircraft | Guilty | Aircraft used for illegal acts |
| Eldin | 1992 | Assault on crew mid-flight | Guilty | Tokyo Convention applies |
| Adebolajo/Adebowale | 2013 | Terrorism involving aviation | Guilty | Terrorism laws apply to aviation |
Key Takeaways
Aviation offences attract severe criminal penalties due to risk to public safety.
UK law works alongside international treaties to police offences onboard and related to aircraft.
Liability can arise from direct acts or conspiracies/plans.
Courts consider the unique risks in aviation when deciding cases.
RELATED Blog
0 comments