Civil Rights Violations Prosecutions In Federal Law
⚖️ Legal Framework
Civil rights violations refer to actions that deprive individuals of rights guaranteed by the Constitution or federal statutes, especially due to race, color, religion, sex, national origin, or disability.
Key federal statutes for prosecution include:
42 U.S.C. § 1983 – Civil action against state officials for deprivation of rights under color of law (civil suits, but criminally relevant).
18 U.S.C. § 241 – Conspiracy against rights.
18 U.S.C. § 242 – Deprivation of rights under color of law (criminal).
Civil Rights Act of 1964, Voting Rights Act, Fair Housing Act, and others for specific contexts.
The Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Rights Division prosecutes serious violations such as police misconduct, hate crimes, and conspiracies.
Important Cases & Prosecutions
1. United States v. Price (1966)
Facts:
In the infamous Mississippi Burning case, Klansmen and law enforcement officers conspired to kill civil rights workers during Freedom Summer 1964.
Federal government charged conspirators under 18 U.S.C. §§ 241 and 242 for violating civil rights.
Legal Issue:
Can private citizens and officials be prosecuted for conspiracy to violate civil rights under federal law?
Decision:
Supreme Court held that federal courts have jurisdiction to prosecute conspiracies involving state officials that violate constitutional rights.
Upheld convictions, emphasizing federal role in civil rights protection.
Significance:
Set precedent for prosecuting state actors and private citizens under civil rights conspiracy laws.
2. United States v. Rodney King Police Officers (1992)
Facts:
Officers involved in the beating of Rodney King were acquitted in state court, triggering riots.
DOJ filed federal charges for civil rights violations under 18 U.S.C. § 242.
Legal Issue:
Can federal civil rights statutes be used to prosecute police brutality after state acquittal?
Decision:
Two officers were convicted federally for willful use of excessive force under color of law.
Significance:
Demonstrated federal government’s role in prosecuting police misconduct when state remedies fail.
3. United States v. Michael Slager (D.S.C., 2017)
Facts:
Slager, a police officer, fatally shot Walter Scott during a traffic stop; Slager was charged with violating Scott’s civil rights.
Legal Issue:
Whether Slager’s use of deadly force violated Scott’s constitutional rights.
Decision:
Slager pleaded guilty to a civil rights violation under 18 U.S.C. § 242.
Significance:
Example of federal prosecution for police use of deadly force violating civil rights.
4. United States v. Ku Klux Klan (1981)
Facts:
Members of the KKK were charged with conspiring to intimidate African American voters during elections.
Legal Issue:
Use of 18 U.S.C. § 241 and Voting Rights Act to prosecute hate crimes and voter intimidation.
Decision:
Convictions affirmed, with heavy sentences for violations of civil rights.
Significance:
Reinforced federal commitment to protecting voting rights and combating racial intimidation.
5. United States v. City of Ferguson (2015)
Facts:
Following Michael Brown’s shooting, DOJ investigated Ferguson Police Department for systemic civil rights abuses.
Legal Issue:
Whether the police department engaged in unconstitutional practices violating citizens’ rights.
Decision:
DOJ found widespread civil rights violations, leading to a consent decree mandating reforms.
Significance:
Showed DOJ’s civil rights enforcement extends to institutional reforms beyond individual prosecutions.
6. United States v. James Alex Fields Jr. (W.D. Va., 2017)
Facts:
Fields drove his car into a crowd of counter-protesters at the Charlottesville rally, killing Heather Heyer.
Legal Issue:
Whether Fields could be prosecuted under federal hate crimes statutes for civil rights violations.
Decision:
Fields pleaded guilty to federal hate crimes, including using a weapon to violate civil rights.
Significance:
Demonstrated federal use of hate crime laws in prosecuting violent acts motivated by race and ideology.
7. United States v. Eric Garner Case (Federal DOJ Investigation, 2014-2019)
Facts:
Eric Garner died after being placed in a chokehold by NYPD officers. The case sparked national outrage.
Legal Issue:
DOJ investigated whether officers violated Garner’s civil rights under color of law.
Decision:
DOJ declined to bring charges due to insufficient evidence of criminal intent.
Significance:
Illustrated the high burden to prove willful deprivation of rights in police misconduct cases.
Summary of Legal Principles
| Principle | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Color of Law | Civil rights violations often require the accused to be acting as a government official or agent. |
| Willfulness | To convict, prosecutors must show intentional deprivation of rights. |
| Conspiracy Provisions | Allows prosecution of coordinated efforts to violate rights (even by private actors). |
| Hate Crimes | Federal laws criminalize violence motivated by bias against protected groups. |
| Institutional Accountability | DOJ can investigate and mandate reforms in government agencies. |
Conclusion
Federal prosecutions for civil rights violations play a crucial role in protecting constitutional guarantees, especially when state courts fail or are unable to act. These prosecutions cover a wide spectrum—from police brutality and voter intimidation to hate crimes and institutional abuses.
The cases above show how federal law enforcement uses statutes like 18 U.S.C. §§ 241 and 242, the Voting Rights Act, and hate crimes laws to enforce civil rights protections.
RELATED Blog
0 comments