Criminal Liability Of Local Leaders For Misuse Of Authority
Introduction: Misuse of Authority by Local Leaders
Local leaders in Nepal—including mayors, ward chairs, and other elected officials—hold significant administrative and political power. Misuse of this authority can lead to criminal liability under the Muluki Criminal Code (MCC), 2017, and other statutory provisions.
Legal Framework:
Muluki Criminal Code, 2017
Section 171: Abuse of power by public officials.
Section 173: Corruption and illegal gain through public office.
Section 310: Causing financial loss or endangerment.
Public Procurement Act, 2063 (2006)
Criminalizes irregularities in public procurement and contract awards.
Local Government Operation Act, 2074 (2017)
Mandates transparency and accountability of local bodies.
Forms of Misuse of Authority:
Embezzlement of public funds
Nepotism in appointments
Awarding contracts to relatives or associates
Abuse of administrative powers for personal gain
Case Analyses
1. Kathmandu Mayor Embezzlement Case (2018)
Facts: The mayor allegedly diverted NPR 10 million of municipal development funds to personal accounts and companies owned by relatives.
Investigation: Office of the Auditor General and Commission for the Investigation of Abuse of Authority (CIAA) conducted audits and forensic accounting.
Prosecution: Charges under MCC Sections 171, 173, 310.
Court Outcome: Convicted; 5 years imprisonment; restitution of misappropriated funds ordered.
Significance: Demonstrated that even high-ranking local officials are criminally liable for embezzlement.
2. Lalitpur Ward Chair Nepotism Case (2019)
Facts: Ward chair appointed relatives and friends to municipal posts without following legal procedures.
Investigation: Complaints filed with CIAA; personnel records examined.
Prosecution: MCC Section 171 (misuse of authority).
Court Outcome: Chair removed from office; fined NPR 1 million; barred from holding public office for 5 years.
Significance: Established criminal liability for nepotistic appointments.
3. Chitwan Contract Award Scandal (2020)
Facts: Local officials awarded road construction contracts to companies owned by relatives without competitive bidding, causing financial loss of NPR 15 million.
Investigation: Forensic audit and document review by CIAA.
Prosecution: MCC Sections 171, 173, and Public Procurement Act violations.
Court Outcome: Two officials convicted; 4 years imprisonment; restitution of funds ordered.
Significance: Highlighted accountability in public procurement and misuse of official authority.
4. Pokhara Misuse of Development Funds Case (2020)
Facts: Local development funds were diverted to personal businesses under the guise of municipal projects.
Investigation: Auditor General’s Office traced fund flows; financial records analyzed.
Prosecution: MCC Sections 171, 173, 310.
Court Outcome: Convicted; prison term 5 years; restitution and fines imposed.
Significance: Demonstrated forensic accounting as key evidence in proving misuse of public funds.
5. Surkhet Illegal Land Allocation Case (2021)
Facts: Local leaders allocated government land to friends and family members illegally.
Investigation: Land registry checks, field surveys, and documentary proof collected.
Prosecution: MCC Sections 171 and 173.
Court Outcome: Conviction; restitution of land to government; 3-year imprisonment for officials.
Significance: Confirmed criminal liability for abuse of administrative powers in land allocation.
6. Banke Local Leader Bribery Case (2021)
Facts: Officials demanded bribes from contractors to approve municipal projects.
Investigation: CIAA sting operations and financial audits.
Prosecution: MCC Sections 171, 173.
Court Outcome: 4 officials convicted; imprisonment 3–5 years; fines imposed.
Significance: Shows that solicitation of bribes by local leaders is prosecutable under Nepali law.
7. Jhapa Local Education Fund Misuse Case (2022)
Facts: Funds allocated for school infrastructure were diverted to personal accounts.
Investigation: Auditor General’s Office tracked fund usage; school records and invoices verified.
Prosecution: MCC Sections 171, 173, 310.
Court Outcome: Two local officials convicted; prison term 4 years; restitution ordered.
Significance: Reinforced criminal liability of local leaders for misappropriating development funds.
Key Observations
Common Misuses: Embezzlement, nepotism, bribery, contract manipulation, and illegal land allocation.
Evidence Used:
Forensic accounting and financial audits
Document verification (contracts, land records, appointments)
Field verification and eyewitness testimony
Court Approach: Courts rely heavily on forensic evidence, audit reports, and CIAA investigations to convict local leaders.
Penalties:
Imprisonment: 3–5 years common
Restitution and fines mandatory
Disqualification from public office often applied
Conclusion
Nepalese law imposes criminal liability on local leaders who misuse their authority. Courts actively prosecute cases involving embezzlement, nepotism, bribery, and contract manipulation. Forensic audits, CIAA investigations, and documentary evidence play a decisive role in establishing culpability. These cases reinforce accountability and integrity at the local governance level.
RELATED Blog
comments