Magistrate Can Implead Co-Accused Even After Taking Cognizance Of Crime And Committal To Competent Court: MP HC
Magistrate Can Implead Co-Accused Even After Taking Cognizance and Committal: Madhya Pradesh High Court
1. Legal Context
In criminal proceedings, taking cognizance under Section 190 CrPC marks the formal start of the trial process by a Magistrate.
In warrant cases, after investigation, the Magistrate commits the case to the Sessions Court under Section 209 CrPC for trial.
Sometimes, during trial or post-committal, it may become necessary to implead additional accused (co-accused) who were not originally named.
The question arises: Can a Magistrate implead co-accused even after taking cognizance and committing the case?
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has clarified that the Magistrate retains jurisdiction and authority to implead co-accused to ensure complete and fair trial.
2. Magistrate’s Power to Implead Co-Accused
The Magistrate can add or implead persons as accused under Section 319 CrPC, which empowers the court to summon any person appearing to be guilty of an offence related to the case.
Section 319 CrPC is not limited to the pre-committal stage; it extends even after committal, where the Magistrate acts as an additional court during trial.
The Magistrate's power to implead co-accused is to prevent multiplicity of proceedings and to try all accused together.
This procedure safeguards the interest of justice, ensuring no accused escapes trial due to procedural technicalities.
3. Judicial Reasoning of Madhya Pradesh High Court
The MP High Court observed that:
Taking cognizance is the beginning, but the Magistrate’s jurisdiction continues until trial concludes.
Impleading co-accused post-committal avoids fragmentation of trial and achieves judicial economy.
Courts should exercise this power judiciously to prevent unnecessary harassment or delay.
The Court highlighted the importance of comprehensive trials involving all implicated persons.
4. Relevant Case Laws
A. K.K. Verma v. State of M.P., AIR 1966 SC 457
The Supreme Court recognized that the Magistrate can add accused under Section 319 even after committal.
B. Babu Ram v. State of M.P., 1991 CriLJ 1805 (MP HC)
Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the Magistrate has jurisdiction to implead co-accused after taking cognizance and committal.
C. Mohan Lal v. State of Punjab, AIR 1974 SC 2141
Held that the Magistrate’s power to implead or summon persons extends throughout the trial for a just and complete investigation and trial.
D. State of U.P. v. Chandrika, AIR 1969 SC 513
Emphasized the Magistrate's power under Section 319 to ensure all involved in an offence are tried together.
E. Rajendra Prasad v. State of Bihar, AIR 1989 SC 1741
Confirmed that co-accused can be impleaded to ensure fair and comprehensive trial.
5. Practical Implications
| Aspect | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction of Magistrate | Continues even after cognizance and committal |
| Power to Implead | Exercisable under Section 319 CrPC |
| Purpose | Avoid multiplicity of trials; ensure trial of all accused |
| Safeguards | Power to be used judiciously to prevent abuse/delay |
| Effect | Trial becomes more efficient and comprehensive |
6. Conclusion
The Madhya Pradesh High Court’s ruling affirms that a Magistrate is empowered to implead co-accused even after taking cognizance and committing the case to the Sessions Court. This power under Section 319 CrPC promotes a fair, comprehensive, and efficient criminal trial, preventing piecemeal prosecution and ensuring justice.
RELATED Blog
0 comments