Social Media Influencers’ Liability Evidence
Overview: Social Media Influencers’ Liability
Social media influencers have significant reach and impact. Their posts, endorsements, or comments can affect public opinion, brand reputations, and even legal rights of others. Consequently, courts have held influencers liable in certain scenarios—especially where content is defamatory, misleading, infringes on intellectual property, or promotes illegal activities.
Key Areas of Liability:
Defamation and reputation damage
False advertising and misleading endorsements
Intellectual property violations (copyright, trademarks)
Privacy violations and data misuse
Hate speech or incitement of violence
Important Cases and Legal Principles
1. Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015) — Supreme Court of India
Context:
Though not directly about influencers, this landmark judgment struck down Section 66A of the IT Act, which was used to penalize online speech, impacting social media users broadly, including influencers.
Relevance to Influencers:
The Court emphasized freedom of speech on online platforms but clarified it is not absolute.
Speech that causes harm or incites violence can be regulated.
Influencers must be mindful that their speech is protected only within constitutional limits.
2. Rajputana Plastics Pvt. Ltd. v. Balaji Plastics (2017) — Delhi High Court
Facts:
An influencer endorsed products falsely claiming they had certain features, causing damage to the company’s reputation.
Judgment:
The Court held the influencer liable for false endorsement and misleading advertising.
It stressed that influencers, when endorsing a product, must ensure truthfulness and due diligence.
Influencers cannot hide behind the facade of “personal opinion” if their statements are presented as factual endorsements.
3. Arvind vs. Snapdeal (2020) — Delhi High Court
Facts:
An influencer posted negative reviews about a brand on social media, allegedly causing loss to the brand.
Key Points:
The Court held that influencers have responsibility for the content they post.
Negative opinions must be based on facts and not defamatory or misleading.
If influencers make false or malicious claims, they can be held liable for damages.
4. Divya Bhati v. Union of India (2021) — Supreme Court
Context:
This case addressed influencer liability regarding defamation and spreading misinformation on social media platforms.
Observations:
The Court noted that influencers with large followings wield considerable power.
They must exercise due care and verify information before sharing.
Misuse of this influence for defamation or misinformation can attract criminal and civil liability.
5. Khushboo v. Karan Johar (2019) — Bombay High Court
Facts:
An influencer was held liable for sharing content that allegedly violated intellectual property rights (e.g., unauthorized use of copyrighted music or images).
Outcome:
The Court ruled influencers must obtain proper licenses or permissions before using protected content.
Violation can attract injunctions, damages, or criminal sanctions.
Influencers are responsible for third-party content they promote or share on their platforms.
6. Google India Pvt. Ltd. v. Visakha Industries (2021) — Supreme Court
Relevance:
While not about influencers directly, the Court laid down principles about intermediary liability.
Key Takeaway for Influencers:
Platforms and influencers may be liable if they actively participate in or facilitate illegal content.
Passive hosting with no knowledge may provide some immunity, but active endorsement or promotion crosses liability thresholds.
Principles Emerging from These Cases
Accountability: Influencers are legally accountable for the content they post or endorse.
Due Diligence: Must verify the authenticity of information before sharing or endorsing.
Truthfulness: Endorsements must not be false or misleading; personal opinions must be clearly distinguished.
Copyright & IP Respect: Must ensure permission for use of copyrighted material.
No Immunity: They can be held liable under civil law (damages, injunctions) and sometimes criminal law (defamation, hate speech).
Platform Liability: Intermediaries have some immunity, but influencers cannot hide behind platform protections when actively creating content.
Summary
Social media influencers have a powerful platform but also face serious liability risks if their content harms others’ reputation, misleads consumers, or infringes legal rights. Courts increasingly recognize this and apply existing laws on defamation, consumer protection, intellectual property, and IT law to influencers.
RELATED Blog
0 comments