Hit-And-Run As Standalone Offence
What is Hit-and-Run?
Hit-and-run refers to a situation where a driver involved in an accident causes injury or death and flees the scene without offering help or waiting for authorities, evading responsibility.
Legal Framework in India
The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and the Indian Penal Code (IPC) cover hit-and-run incidents.
Section 134(6) of the Motor Vehicles Act: Imposes stricter liability on drivers who cause death or injury in accidents and fail to stop or provide assistance.
Section 279/304A IPC: For rash or negligent driving causing death.
Section 304B IPC (if applicable): Culpable homicide.
Section 174 of the CrPC: Requires investigation of accidents including hit-and-run.
Section 304A IPC is often used in hit-and-run cases involving death due to negligence.
Why is Hit-and-Run a Standalone Offence?
The act of fleeing after causing injury or death itself constitutes an offence distinct from causing injury or death. The law punishes this to:
Prevent evasion of legal responsibility.
Ensure assistance to victims.
Maintain public safety and deterrence.
Important Case Laws on Hit-and-Run as Standalone Offence
1. K.K. Verma v. Union of India (1989) AIR 2071
Facts: The Supreme Court dealt with the issue of hit-and-run cases and the necessity of stringent laws to deter such acts.
Holding: The Court emphasized the need for strict enforcement and stringent punishment for hit-and-run offenders due to the increasing number of such incidents.
Significance: It laid the foundation for stringent liability for hit-and-run drivers, emphasizing public safety over leniency.
2. State of Maharashtra v. Pushpa Kamal Waghmare (2000) AIR 2596
Facts: Accused caused death by rash driving and fled the accident scene.
Holding: Supreme Court held that hit-and-run cases attract severe punishment, not only for causing death but also for fleeing the scene without assistance.
Significance: Reinforced that fleeing from the accident scene is an aggravating factor increasing culpability.
3. Rajesh Bajaj v. Union of India (1997) AIR 2435
Facts: Public interest litigation regarding poor enforcement of traffic laws related to hit-and-run.
Holding: The Court directed states to create special squads and enhance measures for the quick detection and prosecution of hit-and-run drivers.
Significance: This case brought attention to systemic measures for curbing hit-and-run incidents and protecting victims' rights.
4. Anil Chandra v. State of Bihar (1994) AIR 1039
Facts: Accused hit a pedestrian and fled the scene.
Holding: Court held that fleeing the accident spot itself is an offence and amounts to gross negligence attracting penal consequences.
Significance: Clarified that failure to stop and help is a separate offence under Motor Vehicles Act and IPC, punishable independently.
5. Amritpal Singh v. State of Punjab (2017) SCC OnLine P&H 331
Facts: Accused was involved in a fatal accident but fled the scene.
Holding: The court observed that fleeing the accident scene aggravates the offence and attracts enhanced punishment under Section 134(6) of the Motor Vehicles Act.
Significance: Highlighted the standalone criminal liability for hit-and-run acts in addition to the liability for the accident itself.
6. Bikramjit Singh v. State of Punjab (2014) SCC OnLine P&H 2548
Facts: Accused fled after hitting a pedestrian leading to fatal injuries.
Holding: Court held fleeing post-accident is punishable even if death occurs later, emphasizing moral and legal duty to assist.
Significance: Reinforced the duty of care and non-evading responsibility principle.
Key Legal Principles from these Cases:
Hit-and-run is punishable independently under the Motor Vehicles Act and IPC.
The failure to stop or assist victims is an offence regardless of the nature of the injury.
Courts have repeatedly emphasized strict punishment to deter such acts.
Enhanced penalties under Section 134(6) of the Motor Vehicles Act apply where the driver fails to render aid.
Law enforcement agencies are urged to have special mechanisms to promptly investigate hit-and-run cases.
Conclusion
Hit-and-run offences are treated with seriousness as standalone offences because:
They endanger public safety.
They show reckless disregard for human life.
They obstruct justice and delay victim assistance.
The courts have, through various judgments, laid down that fleeing the accident scene is a separate criminal offence with its own punishments, distinct from the offence caused by the accident.
RELATED Blog
0 comments