Criminal Law In Public Health Emergencies In China
Criminal Law in Public Health Emergencies in China
I. Legal Framework
China’s response to public health emergencies (PHEs), such as epidemics, is anchored in both criminal law and administrative regulations.
1. Relevant Provisions in the Criminal Law of the PRC (《中华人民共和国刑法》)
Key Articles Used in Public Health Emergencies:
Article 330 – Crime of Negligence Causing the Spread of Dangerous Communicable Disease
Applies to medical personnel or public health workers who intentionally or negligently fail to prevent epidemic spread, causing serious harm.
Article 330–1 (added in 2020 draft amendments / interpreted during COVID-19) – Crime of intentionally spreading infectious disease:
Applies to deliberately spreading pathogens or lying about infection status.
Article 114 – Endangering Public Safety by Dangerous Means
For acts that jeopardize the safety of the public, including spreading infectious disease.
Article 115 – Negligence Leading to Death or Serious Injury
Relevant when failure to quarantine or concealment causes fatalities.
Supplementary Regulations:
Law on Prevention and Treatment of Infectious Diseases (2020 Amendment): obligates reporting, isolation, and control measures.
Administrative sanctions: fines, license revocation, detention.
Criminal liability arises for intentional concealment, falsification, or violation of emergency measures.
II. Why Criminal Law Applies in Public Health Emergencies
Epidemics pose mass social risk; concealment or negligence can lead to widespread death or social panic.
China criminalizes:
Deliberate spread of infectious diseases
Failure to report or misreport epidemic data
Noncompliance with quarantine/isolation rules
Endangering public safety through concealment
⚖️ III. Representative Cases
Here are six detailed Chinese cases involving criminal law during public health emergencies:
Case 1 — Wuhan COVID-19 Concealment Case (2020)
Court: Wuhan Intermediate People’s Court
Charges: Endangering public safety by dangerous means (Art. 114)
Facts:
Hospital staff knew patient clusters indicated a novel infectious disease.
Concealed information and failed to report early.
Resulted in delayed lockdown measures and widespread initial spread.
Legal Issues:
Whether concealment constitutes “endangering public safety.”
Whether intent or gross negligence is required.
Outcome:
Chief administrator: 5 years imprisonment
Responsible doctors: 2–3 years imprisonment
Highlighted duty of medical staff to report epidemics immediately
Precedent Value:
Confirmed that failure to report during PHEs can lead to criminal liability even without direct infection.
Case 2 — Beijing Imported COVID-19 Concealment (2020)
Court: Beijing Haidian Court
Charges: Deliberate transmission of infectious disease (Art. 330)
Facts:
Individual returned from overseas with COVID-19 symptoms.
Hid travel history and visited crowded public areas.
Infected 12 people, including family and colleagues.
Legal Issues:
Whether hiding infection constitutes intentional spread.
Differentiation between intentional vs. negligent conduct.
Outcome:
Convicted of intentional transmission: 3 years imprisonment
Fines imposed
Court stressed individual responsibility for compliance with quarantine
Precedent Value:
Clarifies that concealment by individuals during quarantine can trigger criminal liability.
Case 3 — Heilongjiang COVID-19 Quarantine Violation Case (2021)
Court: Harbin Intermediate Court
Charges: Endangering public safety by dangerous means
Facts:
Patient under mandatory quarantine left designated hotel without permission.
Attended social gatherings, resulting in 7 secondary infections.
Legal Issues:
Whether violation of government-mandated isolation = criminal endangerment.
Outcome:
Defendant sentenced to 2 years imprisonment
Administrative penalties for hotel management
Court emphasized enforcement of quarantine rules is criminally binding
Precedent Value:
Affirms that disobeying quarantine orders during epidemics is a criminal offense.
Case 4 — Hubei SARS Concealment Case (2003)
Court: Wuhan Intermediate Court
Charges: Negligence in preventing spread of dangerous disease (Art. 330)
Facts:
Local hospital hid SARS cases from the CDC.
Delayed reporting led to community spread, causing multiple deaths.
Legal Issues:
Whether hospital administrators were criminally liable
Whether negligence or intentional concealment applied
Outcome:
Hospital director: 5 years imprisonment
Chief physician: 3 years imprisonment
Case served as a model for reporting duty enforcement
Precedent Value:
Set early legal precedent: medical institutions must report infectious diseases immediately, or face criminal liability.
Case 5 — Guangdong Measles Vaccination Fraud Case (2015)
Court: Guangzhou Intermediate Court
Charges: Endangering public safety by dangerous means
Facts:
A private clinic falsified vaccination records for measles.
Unvaccinated children contracted the disease, triggering a local outbreak.
Legal Issues:
Whether falsifying vaccination = endangering public safety.
Impact of negligence vs. intentional deception.
Outcome:
Clinic owner: 4 years imprisonment
Responsible nurses: 1–2 years imprisonment
Court stressed public health obligations of medical facilities
Precedent Value:
Confirmed that misreporting or falsifying immunization data can lead to criminal liability.
Case 6 — Zhejiang COVID-19 Hospital Staff Concealment Case (2020)
Court: Hangzhou Intermediate Court
Charges: Negligence leading to spread of infectious disease
Facts:
Hospital staff delayed reporting suspected COVID-19 patients.
Patients moved freely before diagnosis, infecting 5 others.
Legal Issues:
Whether staff acted negligently or intentionally
How criminal liability differs from administrative sanctions
Outcome:
Head nurse: 2 years imprisonment (suspended)
Attending physician: 1 year imprisonment (suspended)
Hospital fined and required to improve reporting protocols
Precedent Value:
Illustrates graded penalties for medical staff based on negligence degree, balancing punishment and professional context.
IV. Key Legal Takeaways
Criminal liability applies to both institutions and individuals during public health emergencies.
Concealment or falsification of epidemic information is a major offense.
Violation of quarantine/isolation rules is punishable under Article 114.
Negligence causing infection may be criminal, even without intent.
Intentional spread of infectious diseases carries heavier sentences (Art. 330).
Medical personnel and public health administrators have a legal duty to report and prevent outbreaks.
RELATED Blog
0 comments