Section 4 The Prevention of Corruption Act,

Section 4 โ€“ The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988

(As amended by the Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 2018)

๐Ÿ”น Section 4: Cases to be tried by Special Judges

Text (Simplified):
Notwithstanding anything in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, all offences under this Act shall be tried only by Special Judges appointed under Section 3.

๐Ÿงพ Key Provisions Explained:

Exclusive Jurisdiction:
Only a Special Judge (appointed under Section 3 of the Act) can try offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act.

Overriding Effect:
This section overrides the general procedure under the CrPC, meaning regular criminal courts cannot try offences under this Act.

Efficient Trial Process:
The aim is to ensure speedy and focused trials for corruption-related offences by assigning them to dedicated judges.

โš–๏ธ Purpose:

Section 4 is designed to:

Avoid delays in corruption cases.

Ensure that only experienced and designated judges handle such sensitive and technical matters.

Maintain specialized judicial machinery for corruption-related offences involving public servants.

๐Ÿ›๏ธ Related Case Law:

Subramanian Swamy v. Manmohan Singh (2012) 3 SCC 64:
Supreme Court emphasized the importance of timely prosecution in corruption cases and the role of Special Judges.

CBI v. Ashok Kumar Aggarwal (2013):
Reiterated that Special Judges under Section 4 have exclusive jurisdiction in trying corruption-related offences.

 

LEAVE A COMMENT