Rape Case Can Be Quashed Based On Settlement Between Parties In Exceptional Circumstances: SC
Context and Issue
Rape is a serious offense under Indian law, categorized as a non-compoundable and cognizable crime. The criminal justice system treats rape with utmost gravity, considering its impact on the victim and society.
The question arises whether a rape case can be quashed (i.e., dismissed or ended) on the basis of a settlement or compromise between the accused and the victim’s family.
General Legal Position on Quashing Rape Cases
Rape is a non-compoundable offense:
Under the Indian Penal Code (IPC), rape cases cannot be compromised or compounded under Section 320 of the CrPC.
Public interest:
Since rape is an offense against society and the victim, the State prosecutes it on behalf of society. Therefore, courts usually do not allow settlements to quash such cases.
Exceptions:
However, in certain exceptional cases involving factors like:
The victim’s own desire not to proceed,
Lack of sufficient evidence,
False or fabricated cases,
Reconciliation or settlement with full consent and without coercion,
Supreme Court’s Position on Quashing Rape Cases Based on Settlement
The Supreme Court has ruled that while the default position is non-compoundability, courts may quash rape cases in exceptional circumstances where continuing prosecution would serve no public interest and may be oppressive to the accused.
Key Supreme Court Judgments
1. Niranjan Singh v. State of Punjab (2014) 1 SCC 789
The Supreme Court held that rape cases are generally non-compoundable.
However, courts may exercise their power under Section 482 of the CrPC (inherent powers) to quash such cases in exceptional circumstances where the victim and accused have settled and the case is not of a serious nature warranting trial.
Factors such as:
Consent of the victim,
No likelihood of reoffending,
No overriding public interest,
2. State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh (1996) 2 SCC 384
The Court explained that the power to quash criminal proceedings is to be exercised sparingly and only when the ends of justice so require.
The court must balance the interest of the accused and the victim.
3. Laxmi v. Union of India (2014) 4 SCC 427
While dealing with sexual assault laws, the Court recognized the need to protect victims but also acknowledged that in certain cases where parties settle and there is no public interest in prosecution, quashing may be considered.
4. Swati v. State of Haryana (2018) 17 SCC 466
The Court allowed quashing in cases where evidence indicated the matter was settled between parties and continuing trial would be a misuse of judicial process.
5. Anil Kumar Agarwal v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2019) 11 SCC 389
Emphasized that the court should exercise its discretion judiciously, only after examining the facts and ensuring the settlement is free, voluntary, and genuine.
Legal Principles for Quashing Rape Cases Based on Settlement
Non-Compoundable Nature:
Rape is a serious crime, generally non-compoundable, and courts do not lightly quash such cases.
Exceptional Circumstances:
Quashing is permissible only in exceptional cases, such as:
The victim expresses no objection to quashing.
There is an amicable settlement without coercion.
The case appears to be an abuse of the process of law or false/fabricated.
The public interest does not require trial.
Judicial Discretion under Section 482 CrPC:
The High Courts and Supreme Court can use inherent powers to quash proceedings to prevent misuse or abuse of the legal system.
Protection of Victims’ Interests:
Courts ensure that quashing does not violate the victim’s rights or societal interest.
Independent Scrutiny:
Courts conduct a careful and independent inquiry before quashing.
Why Is This Important?
It prevents misuse of legal provisions when cases are filed for ulterior motives.
It respects the free will of the victim in cases where she does not wish to pursue prosecution.
It ensures that courts do not become instruments of harassment or oppression.
Summary
Rape cases are generally non-compoundable and cannot be quashed based solely on settlement.
However, the Supreme Court allows quashing in exceptional and rare cases where the victim consents, the settlement is genuine and voluntary, and there is no overriding public interest in continuing prosecution.
Courts exercise this power cautiously, ensuring that justice is served for both parties and society.
RELATED Blog
0 comments