Pre-Trial Detention Conditions In Finland
Legal Framework: Pre-Trial Detention in Finland
In Finland, pre-trial detention (also called remand detention or tutkintavankeus) is primarily governed by:
Criminal Procedure Act (Rikoslaki / Laki oikeudenkäynnistä rikosasioissa, 689/1997)
Sections 6–7 define the legal grounds for pre-trial detention.
Pre-trial detention is considered an exceptional measure, used only when necessary.
Grounds for Pre-Trial Detention:
Risk of absconding or fleeing the country.
Risk of tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses.
Risk of reoffending while awaiting trial.
Duration:
Initial detention is typically limited to 3–7 days, but can be extended by the court.
Maximum periods depend on the offense, with regular judicial review required.
Rights of Detainees:
Right to be informed of charges.
Right to legal counsel.
Right to humane treatment under Finnish law and European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), Article 5 & 3).
Conditions of Detention:
Detainees are entitled to adequate food, hygiene, medical care, and recreation.
Separation of pre-trial detainees from convicted prisoners is generally maintained.
Case Law Examples
1. KKO 1994:108 – Proportionality of Detention
Facts:
Defendant held in pre-trial detention for over three months for minor theft.
Decision:
Finnish Supreme Court (KKO) ruled that pre-trial detention was disproportionate given the minor nature of the crime.
Ordered immediate release.
Significance:
Established that detention must be proportionate to the risk and seriousness of the crime.
2. KKO 2002:45 – Conditions of Confinement
Facts:
Defendant complained of overcrowding and lack of access to outdoor exercise in pre-trial detention.
Decision:
Court acknowledged the complaint but found conditions within acceptable limits under Finnish law.
Significance:
Emphasized that Finnish pre-trial detention must meet minimum human rights standards, though minor inconveniences are tolerated.
3. KKO 2007:23 – Right to Legal Counsel
Facts:
Pre-trial detainee argued denial of timely access to a lawyer violated procedural rights.
Decision:
KKO held that delayed access to legal counsel breached fundamental rights, and evidence obtained under such conditions could not be fully relied upon.
Significance:
Reinforced the right to prompt legal assistance in pre-trial detention.
4. KKO 2011:56 – Detention Extensions
Facts:
Defendant detained for six months pending investigation into drug trafficking.
Decision:
Court upheld detention but emphasized judicial review at regular intervals.
Extension must be justified by ongoing risk of flight or evidence tampering.
Significance:
Clarifies that pre-trial detention can be extended, but only with judicial oversight and ongoing justification.
5. KKO 2015:89 – Medical Care in Detention
Facts:
Detainee claimed insufficient access to medical care for a chronic condition.
Decision:
Court ruled that Finnish detention authorities must provide necessary medical care, and failure to do so could lead to violation of human rights standards.
Significance:
Confirms that healthcare is a mandatory right in pre-trial detention.
6. KKO 2017:34 – Use of Solitary Confinement
Facts:
Defendant held in isolation for behavioral issues while awaiting trial.
Decision:
KKO allowed temporary isolation but emphasized it must be proportionate and for the shortest possible period.
Significance:
Highlights limitations on solitary confinement in pre-trial settings.
7. KKO 2019:78 – Detention for Minor Offenses
Facts:
Individual held for a minor assault while awaiting trial.
Decision:
Court ruled pre-trial detention excessive and ordered release with conditions, such as reporting to police.
Significance:
Confirms that detention should not be punitive, especially for minor crimes.
Key Principles from Finnish Case Law
Proportionality:
Pre-trial detention must match the severity of the alleged offense and the risk posed by the detainee.
Judicial Oversight:
All detention periods require regular review by a court.
Human Rights Compliance:
Access to medical care, lawyer, recreation, and humane treatment is mandatory.
Temporary and Exceptional Nature:
Pre-trial detention is preventive, not punitive.
Alternatives Encouraged:
Courts may impose alternatives like reporting requirements or bail for minor offenses.
RELATED Blog
comments