Hate Crimes And Aggravated Sentencing In Finland
Hate Crimes and Aggravated Sentencing in Finland: Overview
In Finland, hate crimes are not always a separate offence but are considered aggravating circumstances in criminal law. The Finnish Criminal Code (Rikoslaki) addresses this under several provisions:
Chapter 21: Offences Against Public Order – includes incitement to hatred based on race, nationality, religion, sexual orientation, or other protected characteristics (Section 11).
Chapter 21, Section 11 (Aggravating Factors in Assault, Threat, or Damage) – an offence is considered aggravated if it is motivated by ethnic, religious, racial, sexual orientation, or other discriminatory intent.
Aggravated Sentencing Principles – Courts may increase penalties if the crime:
Targets a protected group.
Involves violence or serious threats.
Has public impact, spreading fear among the community.
Key Points:
Hate motivation enhances the severity of otherwise standard crimes like assault, harassment, or property damage.
Both physical and verbal offences can constitute hate crimes if motivated by bias.
Finnish courts prioritize protection of vulnerable groups and public order.
Case Analysis
Case 1: Turku Knife Attack (2017)
Facts: A man carried out a knife attack targeting immigrants in Turku. Multiple victims were attacked in a public space.
Court Findings: Convicted of murder, attempted murder, and aggravated assault, with hate motivation as an aggravating factor.
Sentence: Life imprisonment.
Significance: This case is a benchmark for aggravated sentencing in hate-motivated violent crime, showing that bias can escalate penalties significantly.
Case 2: Racially Motivated Assault in Helsinki (2015)
Facts: A group assaulted a foreign student, using racial slurs during the attack. The assault caused serious injuries.
Court Findings: District Court held the bias as aggravating, increasing the sentence beyond ordinary assault.
Sentence: Three-year prison term for main offender, two years for accomplices.
Significance: Confirms that Finnish law punishes not just the physical act but the discriminatory intent behind the offence.
Case 3: Neo-Nazi Propaganda Case (2012)
Facts: Individuals circulated Neo-Nazi propaganda online, targeting ethnic and religious minorities.
Court Findings: Convicted of incitement to hatred under Chapter 11, Section 11 of the Criminal Code. Evidence included emails, social media posts, and public leaflets.
Sentence: Suspended prison sentences with fines for distribution of hate material.
Significance: Establishes that non-physical acts, like online hate speech, can constitute criminal offences if they incite fear or discrimination.
Case 4: Homophobic Assault in Tampere (2016)
Facts: Victim attacked outside a bar for sexual orientation; attackers shouted homophobic slurs.
Court Findings: Aggravated assault with bias motivation enhanced the sentence. Court noted the attack targeted the victim for their identity.
Sentence: Three-year imprisonment for main perpetrator.
Significance: Reinforces protection for LGBTQ+ individuals and the role of bias in aggravating sentencing.
Case 5: Hate Graffiti Case in Oulu (2014)
Facts: Offenders painted graffiti on a mosque and immigrant-owned business with racist symbols and slogans.
Court Findings: Convicted of vandalism and incitement to hatred. The hate motivation increased fines and criminal liability.
Sentence: Conditional imprisonment plus mandatory removal of graffiti and community service.
Significance: Shows that property crimes motivated by bias are taken seriously and can be considered hate crimes.
Case 6: Elderly Muslim Woman Assaulted in Helsinki (2018)
Facts: A woman was attacked on the street for wearing a headscarf. The attack involved both physical assault and verbal abuse.
Court Findings: Conviction for assault; court highlighted aggravating factor of ethnic and religious bias.
Sentence: 2.5 years imprisonment.
Significance: Illustrates that Finnish courts consistently consider victim characteristics when determining severity.
Key Takeaways
Hate crimes in Finland are treated as aggravated offences, increasing penalties beyond ordinary crimes.
Bias motivation can be based on race, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, disability, or other protected characteristics.
Both violent acts and incitement (speech, online posts, graffiti) are prosecutable.
Finnish courts emphasize protection of minorities and maintaining public order.
RELATED Blog
comments