Research On State-Security Charges Applied To Foreign Ngos And Aid Workers
1. Egypt – Case 173 / 2011 (“Foreign Funding Case”)
Background:
In 2011, Egyptian authorities accused 43 NGOs, both local and foreign-funded, of operating illegally and harming national security.
The government claimed these NGOs were receiving foreign funds to undermine state institutions like the army, police, and judiciary.
Legal Framework:
Charges were based on operating without proper licenses and receiving foreign funds that allegedly threatened national security.
The law allowed broad discretion to criminally prosecute NGO workers for “undermining public order.”
Outcome:
Several NGO leaders were sentenced to prison terms from 1–5 years; others received fines or suspended sentences.
Over the years, the case faced international criticism, and some charges were eventually dropped due to lack of evidence.
Significance:
Illustrates how foreign funding can be criminalized under the guise of national security.
Showed the chilling effect on civil society in Egypt, discouraging NGOs from operating or accepting foreign grants.
2. Russia – Foreign Agent Law Enforcement
Background:
Russia enacted the “Foreign Agent Law” in 2012, requiring NGOs receiving foreign funds and engaging in political activity to register as foreign agents.
Violations could lead to criminal charges against NGO staff.
Case Example:
Valentina Cherevatenko, a Russian human rights activist, was investigated in 2016 for failing to register her organization as a foreign agent.
Charges:
Criminal liability for “malicious evasion” of registration, punishable by up to two years in prison.
Outcome:
Charges were eventually dropped, but the case demonstrated the threat of criminal prosecution.
Significance:
The law criminalizes basic NGO activities and stigmatizes civil society actors.
It allows the state to suppress dissent under the cover of national security.
3. Russia – Laurent Vinatier Espionage Case
Background:
Laurent Vinatier, a French researcher working for an international NGO, was detained by Russian authorities.
He was accused of collecting sensitive military information potentially threatening state security.
Charges:
Initially for failing to comply with foreign agent registration.
Later escalated to espionage, which carries severe penalties.
Outcome:
The case remains ongoing, highlighting the potential for foreign aid workers to face serious criminal charges under national security laws.
Significance:
Shows the escalation from regulatory violations to criminal state-security charges for foreign NGOs and researchers.
Acts as a warning to international NGOs operating in politically sensitive areas.
4. Egypt – Human Rights Lawyers Targeted (Post-2011)
Background:
In addition to NGO staff, individual human rights lawyers were accused under the same “foreign funding / national security” framework.
Notable figures included Azza Soliman and Mostafa Al-Hassan.
Charges:
Running unlicensed NGOs.
Receiving foreign funds “to harm national security.”
Risked long prison sentences, theoretically even life imprisonment.
Outcome:
Some faced trials, while others were threatened or had travel restrictions imposed.
Significance:
Demonstrates that state-security charges can target individuals associated with NGOs, not just the organizations themselves.
Amplifies the chilling effect on civil society.
5. Russia – Undesirable Organizations Law (2015)
Background:
Russia passed a law allowing the government to declare foreign NGOs “undesirable” if they pose a threat to national security.
Implications for Individuals:
Staff and collaborators risk criminal prosecution if they continue working with banned organizations.
Outcome:
Several foreign NGOs were forced to close operations in Russia.
Local staff faced harassment and possible criminal liability.
Significance:
Legal framework provides the state with broad discretion to criminalize civil society work.
Enforces compliance through threat of prosecution rather than court judgments in many cases.
6. Egypt – 2019 NGO Law Reform
Background:
Egypt passed a stricter NGO law in 2019, giving the government authority to control foreign NGO activities directly.
Charges / Legal Authority:
NGOs must obtain approval from the Foreign Ministry for funding or projects.
Activities deemed harmful to public order or national security could trigger legal sanctions, including criminal charges.
Outcome:
While no specific prosecutions were highlighted, the law institutionalized the ability to bring state-security charges against NGOs.
Significance:
Institutionalized a legal pathway for criminalizing foreign NGOs.
Strengthened government control and created a sustained chilling effect on civil society operations.
Analysis and Trends:
National security laws are increasingly used to suppress foreign NGOs.
Criminal liability often extends to both organizations and individual staff.
Laws like “foreign agent” or “undesirable organization” provide legal cover for targeting civil society.
Even if prosecutions fail, the threat serves as a strong deterrent.
Both Egypt and Russia show how foreign funding can become a pretext for state-security charges.
RELATED Blog
comments