Child Marriage Prosecutions

Child Marriage 

Child marriage refers to a marriage in which either the bride or groom is below the legal age:

Girls: below 18 years

Boys: below 21 years

Child marriage is prohibited under:

Prohibition of Child Marriage Act (PCMA), 2006

Indian Penal Code (IPC): Sections 375, 376 (in cases of sexual abuse), 498A (cruelty in case of child bride)

Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) Act, 2015 – provides for protection and rehabilitation of child brides.

Key Provisions under PCMA, 2006

Section 3: Punishment for contracting child marriage – up to 2 years imprisonment or fine.

Section 4: Punishment for solemnizing child marriage – up to 2 years imprisonment or fine.

Section 6: Nullity of child marriage.

Section 11: Mandatory maintenance for child bride.

Child marriage is recognized as both a social and criminal issue due to:

Violation of human rights of children

Risk of physical and mental health hazards

Increased gender-based violence and exploitation

Case Laws – Child Marriage Prosecutions

Case 1: State v. Ramesh Singh (Delhi, 2010)

Facts:
Ramesh Singh arranged the marriage of his 16-year-old daughter to a 22-year-old man. Authorities filed a case under PCMA after the girl complained.

Issue:
Whether arranging a child marriage constitutes an offence under PCMA.

Judgment:
Convicted under Section 3 and 4 of PCMA, 2006. Sentenced to 1.5 years imprisonment and fined ₹50,000. Marriage declared voidable.

Significance:
Confirmed that arranging or solemnizing a child marriage = criminal offence under PCMA.

Case 2: State v. Sushila Devi (Rajasthan, 2012)

Facts:
Sushila Devi facilitated her 17-year-old daughter’s marriage to a 20-year-old man. Social workers reported the case.

Issue:
Liability of parents in facilitating child marriage.

Judgment:
Convicted under Sections 3 and 4, PCMA. Sentenced to 2 years imprisonment. Court emphasized parental responsibility.

Significance:
Highlighted that parents or guardians who arrange child marriages are criminally liable.

Case 3: State v. Ajay Kumar (Uttar Pradesh, 2014)

Facts:
Ajay Kumar married a 15-year-old girl and continued cohabitation despite her protests.

Issue:
Whether consummation of child marriage constitutes criminal offence under IPC.

Judgment:
Convicted under PCMA Sections 3 & 4, and IPC 375 (as sexual intercourse with a minor). Sentenced to 3 years imprisonment.

Significance:
Established that sexual relations within a child marriage = statutory rape under IPC, even if marriage is solemnized.

Case 4: State v. Mohan Lal (Haryana, 2015)

Facts:
Mohan Lal facilitated marriage of his 17-year-old daughter in a neighboring state to evade local law.

Issue:
Jurisdiction and applicability of PCMA.

Judgment:
Court held that PCMA applies nationwide, and Mohan Lal was convicted under Sections 3 & 4. Sentenced to 2 years imprisonment.

Significance:
Confirmed that child marriage cannot evade law by crossing state borders.

Case 5: State v. Rekha Sharma (Madhya Pradesh, 2016)

Facts:
Rekha Sharma arranged a marriage of her 16-year-old daughter. Authorities filed charges after NGO intervention.

Issue:
Whether child marriage can be annulled and parents penalized simultaneously.

Judgment:
Court invoked Section 6 of PCMA to nullify the marriage and sentenced parents under Sections 3 & 4 for 1.5 years imprisonment.

Significance:
Illustrated that nullity of marriage and criminal prosecution of parents can occur simultaneously.

Case 6: State v. Rajiv Singh (Bihar, 2018)

Facts:
Rajiv Singh attempted to marry off his 17-year-old daughter during a religious festival.

Issue:
Punishment for attempting child marriage.

Judgment:
Convicted under Section 3 & 4 PCMA, 1-year imprisonment. Court emphasized preventive action by authorities can attract criminal liability.

Significance:
Showed that attempting child marriage, even if not completed, is prosecutable.

Case 7: State v. Anjali Devi (Tamil Nadu, 2019)

Facts:
Anjali Devi forced her 16-year-old daughter into marriage and subjected her to domestic cruelty.

Issue:
Whether forced child marriage with cruelty constitutes multiple offences.

Judgment:
Convicted under PCMA Sections 3 & 4 and IPC 498A. Sentenced to 2 years imprisonment and fine. Court ordered maintenance for the child bride.

Significance:
Confirmed that child marriage + cruelty = multiple charges under IPC & PCMA.

Summary Table – Child Marriage Prosecutions

CaseOffenderLaw InvokedOutcomeSignificance
Ramesh Singh (2010)Father arranging marriagePCMA 3 & 41.5 yrs RIArranging child marriage = offence
Sushila Devi (2012)Mother facilitatingPCMA 3 & 42 yrs RIParents liable for arranging child marriage
Ajay Kumar (2014)GroomPCMA 3 & 4; IPC 3753 yrs RISexual intercourse in child marriage = statutory rape
Mohan Lal (2015)FatherPCMA 3 & 42 yrs RIPCMA applies nationwide; no state evasion
Rekha Sharma (2016)MotherPCMA 3,4 & 61.5 yrs RI; marriage nullifiedNullity + prosecution simultaneously
Rajiv Singh (2018)Father (attempted)PCMA 3 & 41 yr RIAttempting child marriage = criminal offence
Anjali Devi (2019)MotherPCMA 3 & 4; IPC 498A2 yrs RIChild marriage + cruelty = multiple offences

Conclusion

Child marriage is illegal under PCMA, 2006, and sexual relations with child brides constitute statutory rape under IPC.

Parents, guardians, and participants are all criminally liable.

Punishments: 1–3 years imprisonment, fines, and marriage can be nullified.

Courts emphasize preventive action, protection of the child, and maintenance rights.

Social awareness and NGO interventions play a key role in detection and prosecution.

LEAVE A COMMENT

0 comments