Criminal Liability For Pollution Disasters
🧠Overview: Criminal Liability for Pollution Disasters in China
Pollution disasters in China are serious offenses due to their threat to public health, environment, and social stability. The Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China specifically addresses environmental crimes:
Relevant Legal Provisions
Article 338 – Polluting the environment with dangerous substances causing serious consequences.
Article 339 – Illegal disposal of hazardous waste.
Article 341 – Illegal operation of dangerous chemicals causing environmental pollution.
Article 347 – Production, sale, or disposal of materials seriously damaging the environment.
Key Principles
Liability depends on intent, negligence, and resulting harm.
Penalties include fixed-term imprisonment, fines, or confiscation of property, depending on severity.
Corporate executives can be held personally liable.
⚖️ 1. Songhua River Benzene Spill Case (2005)
Location: Heilongjiang Province
Type: Industrial pollution
Facts:
A chemical plant in Jilin released benzene and nitrobenzene into the Songhua River.
The spill affected millions of residents’ drinking water and led to cross-border pollution into Russia.
Legal Proceedings:
The company’s general manager and technical director were prosecuted under Article 338 (pollution causing serious consequences).
Both were sentenced to 7–12 years imprisonment and heavy fines.
Significance:
First major case involving cross-border environmental pollution.
Highlighted criminal liability of corporate executives.
Triggered stricter environmental monitoring and emergency response systems.
⚖️ 2. Tianjin Port Explosives and Toxic Chemicals Explosion (2015)
Location: Tianjin
Type: Industrial accident causing pollution
Facts:
The Tianjin port warehouse explosion released toxic substances including nitrocellulose and cyanide.
Hundreds were killed or injured, and the surrounding environment was heavily polluted.
Legal Proceedings:
Executives of the warehouse company were charged under Articles 338 and 340 (pollution and negligence causing disaster).
They received life imprisonment and 15–20 years imprisonment for serious negligence.
Companies were fined billions of yuan.
Significance:
Demonstrated criminal responsibility for negligence leading to environmental disaster.
Led to reform in hazardous chemicals storage regulations.
⚖️ 3. Dalian Petrochemical Wastewater Discharge Case (2017)
Location: Dalian, Liaoning Province
Type: Illegal discharge of hazardous wastewater
Facts:
A petrochemical company illegally discharged heavy metals and organic chemicals into the sea.
The discharge caused mass fish deaths and local economic loss.
Legal Proceedings:
The plant manager and environmental officer were prosecuted under Article 338.
Sentences ranged from 5–10 years imprisonment, and companies were fined.
Significance:
Strengthened enforcement of wastewater discharge standards.
Emphasized that corporate negligence causing ecological harm attracts criminal liability.
⚖️ 4. Jiangsu Dyeing Industry Pollution Case (2018)
Location: Suzhou, Jiangsu Province
Type: Illegal chemical discharge
Facts:
Dyeing factories discharged untreated industrial dye wastewater into rivers.
Water pollution affected nearby villages and agricultural land.
Legal Proceedings:
Local courts prosecuted owners under Articles 338 and 339.
Penalties: 3–8 years imprisonment and fines for main offenders; minor staff received administrative sanctions.
Significance:
Reinforced accountability of multiple stakeholders in environmental crimes.
Encouraged implementation of environmental compliance systems in industrial parks.
⚖️ 5. Hebei Heavy Metal Soil Pollution Case (2020)
Location: Hebei Province
Type: Soil and groundwater contamination
Facts:
A smelting company discharged lead and cadmium into soil and groundwater over several years.
Local residents suffered health problems, and crops were contaminated.
Legal Proceedings:
Company executives prosecuted under Article 338 (causing serious environmental pollution).
Sentences ranged from 6–12 years imprisonment, with corporate fines exceeding 100 million yuan.
Significance:
Demonstrated the law’s application to long-term environmental contamination.
Highlighted the integration of public health impact in sentencing decisions.
⚖️ 6. Hubei Chemical Plant Explosion (2019)
Location: Hubei Province
Type: Environmental pollution due to chemical explosion
Facts:
Chemical plant explosion released toxic gas into the surrounding villages.
Residents were evacuated, and agricultural land was damaged.
Legal Proceedings:
Executives and plant manager prosecuted under Articles 338–340.
Sentences: 7–15 years imprisonment for main perpetrators.
Significance:
Emphasized combined liability for pollution and public safety risks.
Encouraged stricter safety inspections and emergency preparedness.
🧩 Key Observations
Corporate executives bear personal criminal liability for pollution disasters.
Severity of punishment depends on:
Extent of pollution
Public health impact
Economic losses
Cases demonstrate both intentional and negligent pollution are punishable.
Criminal law interacts with environmental regulations and administrative fines.
Recent trends show strict enforcement against industrial and chemical pollution, reflecting China’s “Green Development” policy.
RELATED Blog
comments