Offences Relating To Elections Under Ipc
1. Overview: Offences Relating to Elections under IPC
Elections are fundamental to democracy, and the Indian Penal Code (IPC) includes provisions to criminalize corrupt or unfair practices during elections. Although the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (RPA) specifically deals with election offenses, certain IPC sections also apply to election-related crimes.
Common IPC Offences Related to Elections:
Section 171B: Bribery at elections.
Section 171C: Undue influence or personation at elections.
Section 171D: Punishment for bribery.
Section 171E: Punishment for undue influence or personation.
Section 171F: False statement in connection with election.
Section 171G: Punishment for bribery and corruption.
Section 171H: False statement in connection with election.
These provisions penalize corrupt practices like bribery, intimidation, personation (voting as another person), making false statements to influence voters, and other malpractices.
2. Detailed Explanation of Key IPC Sections
Section 171B IPC defines bribery at elections. It includes promising or giving any gift, reward, or advantage to influence voters.
Section 171C IPC prohibits undue influence (intimidation, force, coercion) or personation.
Section 171F IPC penalizes false statements about candidates to affect election results.
Section 171G & 171H specify punishment for bribery and false statements.
3. Important Case Laws on Election Offences under IPC
Case 1: M. Karunanidhi vs. Union of India, AIR 1979 SC 898
Facts: This landmark case involved allegations of corrupt practices during elections.
Issue: Whether election offences under IPC and Representation of the People Act can be tried by ordinary criminal courts.
Judgment: The Supreme Court held that election offences can be tried by criminal courts, but election petitions and disputes relating to elections are to be decided by designated election tribunals under the RPA.
Significance: Clarified the jurisdiction and procedural aspects for election offences under IPC.
Case 2: K. Anbazhagan v. P. Kannan, AIR 2000 SC 2967
Facts: The appellant was accused of making false statements about a rival candidate during the election.
Issue: Whether Section 171F IPC relating to false statements during elections had been violated.
Judgment: The Supreme Court held that false statements about personal character or conduct of a candidate intended to affect election results are punishable.
Significance: Reinforced that spreading false information to malign a candidate during elections is a serious offence.
Case 3: Jagjit Singh v. State of Punjab, AIR 1967 SC 63
Facts: The accused was charged with undue influence and personation during elections.
Issue: Whether Section 171C IPC was violated.
Judgment: The Court emphasized that undue influence includes use of threats, coercion, or any form of intimidation to affect voter choice.
Significance: Defined the broad scope of undue influence under election law and upheld strict penal provisions.
Case 4: State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal, AIR 1992 SC 604
Facts: Although primarily about misuse of power, this case is relevant for discussing abuse during elections.
Issue: Abuse of official position to influence election results.
Judgment: The Court laid down guidelines to prevent abuse of power by public officials during elections.
Significance: Helped ensure free and fair elections by discouraging misuse of government machinery.
Case 5: Gopal Singh v. Satya Dev, AIR 1973 SC 56
Facts: The case involved bribery allegations under Section 171B and 171D IPC.
Issue: Whether offering gifts or money to voters constitutes bribery.
Judgment: The Court held that any attempt to induce voters by promise or gift is bribery and punishable.
Significance: Affirmed that corrupt inducements violate the electoral process and invite penal consequences.
Case 6: Kartar Singh v. State of Punjab, AIR 1967 SC 1762
Facts: Alleged personation and false voting during elections.
Issue: Interpretation of personation under Section 171C IPC.
Judgment: The Supreme Court held that personation is a cognizable offence and punishable to maintain the integrity of the electoral process.
Significance: Emphasized strict measures against impersonation to uphold election integrity.
4. Summary of Legal Principles
Bribery (Sections 171B, 171D, 171G): Includes offering money, gifts, or favors to voters to influence their choice; strictly prohibited and punishable.
Undue Influence and Personation (Section 171C): Threats, coercion, impersonation, or intimidation to influence votes are offenses.
False Statements (Sections 171F, 171H): Dissemination of false information about candidates to affect elections is a punishable offence.
Jurisdiction: Criminal courts try election offences under IPC, but election disputes are decided by election tribunals.
Strict Enforcement: Courts have consistently held that election offences undermine democracy and must be strictly dealt with to ensure free and fair elections.
RELATED Blog
0 comments