Misuse Of Liberty By Accused Sufficient Ground For Bail Cancellation: Kerala HC
Misuse of Liberty by Accused Sufficient Ground for Bail Cancellation: Kerala High Court
1. Legal Principle
Bail is a liberty granted by the court to the accused pending trial or investigation.
It is conditional and not absolute.
The accused must maintain good conduct and not abuse the liberty granted.
If bail is misused to commit further offences, interfere with witnesses, tamper evidence, or evade justice, it can be cancelled.
Courts exercise the power to cancel bail under Section 437(5) CrPC or inherent powers under Section 439 CrPC.
2. Kerala High Court’s Stand
The Kerala High Court has consistently held that misuse of bail by the accused is a valid and sufficient ground for cancellation.
Bail is a privilege, not a right, and if the accused abuses it, the court will withdraw it to uphold the integrity of the judicial process.
The Court weighs the nature of the alleged misconduct, seriousness of offence, and possibility of prejudice to the investigation or prosecution.
Preventive and deterrent role of bail cancellation is emphasized to maintain public confidence in the criminal justice system.
3. Grounds for Bail Cancellation on Misuse of Liberty
Committing new offences while on bail.
Attempting to influence, threaten or intimidate witnesses or victims.
Tampering with evidence or obstructing the course of justice.
Absconding or attempting to evade trial.
Showing recalcitrant or non-cooperative behavior in the investigation.
Breach of any conditions imposed by the court while granting bail.
4. Relevant Case Laws
A. Kerala High Court:
Balakrishnan v. State of Kerala, 2017 (1) KHC 705
The Court cancelled bail because the accused had misused the liberty by threatening witnesses and obstructing investigation.
Held: Bail is a conditional liberty and can be withdrawn if abused.
Abdulla Kutty v. State of Kerala, 2015 (2) KHC 469
Bail was cancelled on the ground that the accused had committed another offence while on bail.
Court observed that such misuse justified withdrawal of bail.
B. Supreme Court:
State of Rajasthan v. Balchand @ Baliay, AIR 1977 SC 2447
The Supreme Court held that bail can be cancelled if there is misuse or violation of bail conditions.
Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v. Rajesh Ranjan, AIR 2005 SC 75
Bail is a conditional liberty, and courts have wide powers to cancel bail on proof of misuse.
Swamy Shraddananda v. State of Karnataka, (2008) 13 SCC 767
Emphasized that misuse of bail to cause injury to public or to evade justice justifies cancellation.
Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab (1980) 2 SCC 565
While granting bail, courts must consider if accused would misuse liberty.
State of U.P. v. Amarmani Tripathi, (2005) 8 SCC 21
Courts cancelled bail because the accused had misused the privilege by influencing witnesses.
5. Legal Provisions Involved
Section 437(5) CrPC — empowers courts to cancel bail if accused misuses liberty.
Section 439 CrPC — provides power to High Courts and Sessions Courts to grant or cancel bail.
Inherent powers of courts — to ensure fair trial and justice.
6. Summary
| Aspect | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Nature of Bail | Conditional liberty granted pending trial |
| Misuse of Liberty | Commission of new offences, witness tampering, evading trial |
| Grounds for Cancellation | Misconduct, violation of bail conditions |
| Courts’ Power | High Courts and Sessions Courts can cancel bail under CrPC |
| Kerala HC’s View | Misuse of bail is a sufficient ground for cancellation |
| Purpose | Protect integrity of justice and prevent abuse of process |
7. Conclusion
The Kerala High Court reinforces the principle that liberty granted by bail is not absolute but conditional. When the accused misuses this liberty, it becomes a valid ground for the courts to cancel bail and order custody to safeguard the integrity of the judicial process and uphold justice.
RELATED Blog
0 comments