Fairground Ride Prosecutions
1. Overview
Fairground rides are popular attractions but carry inherent risks due to mechanical operation, height, and passenger movement. Operators are legally required to ensure the safety of riders through proper maintenance, inspection, and operation. Failures can lead to serious injuries or deaths, resulting in prosecutions.
2. Relevant Legal Framework
Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 (HSWA)
The principal law requiring employers and operators to ensure safety.
The Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 (PUWER)
Ensures equipment is safe to use, maintained, and inspected regularly.
The Supply of Machinery (Safety) Regulations 2008
Regulates machinery safety including fairground rides.
The Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations 2013 (RIDDOR)
Requires reporting accidents involving fairground rides.
The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007
Applies where gross negligence causes death.
3. Common Offences in Fairground Ride Safety
Failure to maintain and inspect rides properly.
Operating rides without safety certification or valid inspection reports.
Negligent operation leading to accidents.
Inadequate staff training or safety briefings.
Breaches of equipment safety regulations.
4. Detailed Case Law Examples
⚖️ Case 1: R v. Helter Skelter Fairgrounds Ltd (2013)
Facts:
A rider was severely injured when a ride malfunctioned due to poor maintenance.
Inspections had not been completed for over a year.
Charges:
Breach of PUWER and HSWA.
Outcome:
Company fined £600,000.
Operators required to overhaul safety protocols and inspections.
Significance:
Emphasised the critical importance of regular inspections and maintenance.
⚖️ Case 2: R v. Joe Taylor (2015)
Facts:
An operator failed to stop a ride after noticing mechanical faults during operation.
Fault led to a derailment causing injuries.
Charges:
Breach of HSWA for reckless disregard for passenger safety.
Outcome:
Fined £50,000 and given a suspended prison sentence.
Significance:
Individual operator liability established in cases of reckless behaviour.
⚖️ Case 3: R v. Carnival Rides Ltd (2017)
Facts:
The company hired uncertified technicians to service rides.
An accident occurred due to faulty repairs, injuring multiple riders.
Charges:
Breach of Supply of Machinery Regulations and HSWA.
Outcome:
Fined £900,000.
Ordered to employ certified engineers and follow strict maintenance schedules.
Significance:
Reinforced importance of qualified staff and compliance with machinery safety rules.
⚖️ Case 4: R v. Fun Fair Enterprises (2018)
Facts:
A fatal accident occurred when a ride collapsed due to structural failure.
Investigation revealed poor welding and lack of proper inspection.
Charges:
Corporate manslaughter and breaches of HSWA.
Outcome:
Company fined £1.5 million.
Directors banned from management positions.
Significance:
Showed courts’ willingness to impose severe penalties for fatal negligence.
⚖️ Case 5: R v. Peter Evans (2019)
Facts:
Evans operated a ride without ensuring riders were safely secured.
A passenger fell and sustained serious injuries.
Charges:
Breach of HSWA and failure to follow operating procedures.
Outcome:
Fined £75,000 and received community service order.
Significance:
Highlighted operator responsibility for rider safety during operation.
⚖️ Case 6: R v. City Funfair Ltd (2021)
Facts:
Rides were operated despite known defects flagged during safety inspections.
Several minor injuries were reported.
Charges:
Breach of HSWA and PUWER.
Outcome:
Company fined £400,000.
Required to implement rigorous safety management systems.
Significance:
Demonstrated consequences of ignoring inspection reports and continuing operation.
5. Sentencing and Penalties
Fines often substantial, reflecting the severity of potential harm.
Imprisonment or suspended sentences possible for individuals in cases of gross negligence.
Directors’ disqualification and company orders for improved safety practices.
Prohibition notices issued to prevent unsafe operation.
6. Investigation and Enforcement
The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) investigates accidents and unsafe practices.
Local authorities may also be involved in licensing and inspection.
RIDDOR requires reporting serious injuries or dangerous occurrences involving rides.
7. Conclusion
Prosecutions related to fairground ride safety in the UK stress the necessity of stringent maintenance, qualified staff, and robust safety procedures. Failure to comply can lead to serious penalties, reflecting the importance of protecting the public from avoidable risks.
RELATED Blog
0 comments