Role Of Law Commission In Criminal Justice
🔍 Role of the Law Commission in Criminal Justice
1. What is the Law Commission?
The Law Commission is a statutory or non-statutory body established by the government to recommend reforms in laws, including criminal laws, with the aim of making the legal system more efficient, just, and in tune with contemporary needs.
In India, the Law Commission is a non-permanent body constituted under the Law Commission Act, 1955.
It generally functions for three years at a time and submits reports on various legal issues.
2. Role and Functions of the Law Commission in Criminal Justice
Review of existing criminal laws and suggesting amendments.
Recommending new laws or repealing obsolete laws.
Proposing reforms to improve the criminal justice system (e.g., procedures, evidence law, sentencing).
Advising on issues of criminal jurisprudence such as bail, trial procedures, victim rights.
Promoting human rights and constitutional values in criminal law.
Facilitating access to justice and reducing delays.
Suggesting measures to deal with emerging challenges like cybercrime, terrorism.
3. Significance in Criminal Justice
The Law Commission has played a vital role in reforming laws like the Indian Penal Code (IPC), Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), Indian Evidence Act, and juvenile justice laws.
It serves as a bridge between the judiciary, legislature, and executive.
Its reports often lead to legislative changes or influence judicial interpretations.
🧑⚖️ Important Case Laws Reflecting the Role of the Law Commission
🔹 1. Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab, AIR 1980 SC 898
📌 Facts:
The case dealt with the constitutionality of the death penalty.
⚖️ Court Reference to Law Commission:
The Supreme Court referred extensively to the Law Commission's 35th report (1967) which recommended limiting the death penalty to the "rarest of rare" cases.
The Court formulated the “rarest of rare” doctrine based on these recommendations.
🔑 Importance:
The Law Commission’s report provided the foundation for restricting capital punishment.
Shows how judicial decisions rely on Law Commission reports for progressive criminal justice reforms.
🔹 2. M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (Taj Corridor Case), AIR 2000 SC 1997
📌 Facts:
Environmental public interest litigation regarding construction near Taj Mahal.
⚖️ Court Reference to Law Commission:
The Court referred to the Law Commission's recommendations on environmental crimes and stricter penalties.
The case underscored the Law Commission’s role in modernizing criminal laws to protect public interest.
🔑 Importance:
Demonstrates the role of the Law Commission in recommending reforms for emerging types of crimes, including environmental offenses.
🔹 3. Kartar Singh v. State of Punjab, AIR 1994 SC 569
📌 Facts:
Case involving terrorism-related offenses under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA).
⚖️ Court Reference:
The Supreme Court referred to Law Commission reports concerning terrorism laws, procedural safeguards, and fair trial rights.
Highlighted the Commission’s role in balancing national security and individual rights.
🔑 Importance:
The Law Commission helps in harmonizing criminal laws with constitutional guarantees, especially in sensitive areas like terrorism.
🔹 4. People’s Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India, AIR 1997 SC 568
📌 Facts:
Dealt with the misuse of preventive detention laws and police excesses.
⚖️ Court Reference:
The Court referred to Law Commission reports recommending reforms in criminal procedure and police accountability.
Emphasized recommendations to curb arbitrary arrests and custodial violence.
🔑 Importance:
Shows how the Law Commission’s work influences judicial directions to improve police and procedural reforms.
🔹 5. State of Rajasthan v. Balchand, AIR 1977 SC 2447
📌 Facts:
Involved the interpretation of Section 300 IPC (culpable homicide vs murder).
⚖️ Court Reference:
The Supreme Court cited the Law Commission's reports on the IPC while interpreting criminal liability and categorization of offenses.
The Law Commission’s clarifications on mens rea and intention were instrumental.
🔑 Importance:
Indicates the Law Commission’s vital role in clarifying substantive criminal law principles.
🔹 6. Ramesh v. Union of India, AIR 1981 SC 1658
📌 Facts:
Considered reforms in bail and anticipatory bail provisions.
⚖️ Court Reference:
The Supreme Court relied on Law Commission reports suggesting more liberal bail provisions to safeguard liberty.
This influenced the development of Section 438 CrPC (anticipatory bail).
🔑 Importance:
Demonstrates the Law Commission’s impact on procedural safeguards for accused persons.
📌 Summary: How Law Commission Shapes Criminal Justice
| Function | Role & Impact |
|---|---|
| Law Reform Recommendations | Suggested amendments to IPC, CrPC, Evidence Act |
| Human Rights Integration | Advocates procedural fairness, limits on death penalty |
| Modernization of Laws | Cybercrime, terrorism, environmental crimes |
| Procedural Reforms | Bail, trial process, evidence evaluation |
| Victim Protection & Restorative Justice | Focus on victim’s rights and alternative dispute resolution |
RELATED Blog
0 comments