Blasphemy As A Criminal Offence In Afghanistan
1. Introduction
Blasphemy, defined broadly as disrespect or insult to religious beliefs, symbols, or figures, is a criminal offense under Afghan law and is treated with great seriousness due to the country’s Islamic identity. In Afghanistan, both formal legal codes and customary/religious norms criminalize blasphemy.
The criminalization of blasphemy reflects Afghanistan’s conservative Islamic society, where religious values deeply influence law and order.
2. Legal Framework on Blasphemy in Afghanistan
Afghan Penal Code (1976, amended):
Though the Penal Code does not explicitly define blasphemy, it criminalizes acts considered offensive to Islam, including insulting the Prophet Muhammad, desecrating the Quran, or promoting apostasy. Articles related to insulting religion, disturbing public order by religious offenses, and apostasy are applied in blasphemy cases.
Islamic Sharia:
The primary source of law, especially under Taliban and conservative interpretations, which strictly forbids blasphemy and prescribes harsh punishments, including death in some cases.
Customary and Tribal Law:
In some regions, local jirgas and ulema enforce punishments for blasphemy outside formal courts.
3. Types of Conduct Constituting Blasphemy
Insulting the Prophet Muhammad or other revered Islamic figures.
Desecrating or insulting the Quran.
Criticizing Islamic tenets or clerics.
Apostasy (renouncing Islam).
Publicly questioning religious doctrines.
4. Detailed Case Law Examples of Blasphemy Prosecutions
⚖️ Case 1: Execution of Abdul Rahman for Apostasy (2006)
Facts:
Abdul Rahman, a convert from Islam to Christianity, was charged with apostasy under Afghan law after openly declaring his conversion.
Legal Proceedings:
Charged with blasphemy and apostasy.
Public outcry and international pressure led to his release after intervention.
Significance:
Though he avoided execution, this case highlighted how blasphemy and apostasy are punishable by death under Afghan law and tradition.
⚖️ Case 2: Blasphemy Charges Against Journalist Ahmad Wali Karzai (2011)
Facts:
Ahmad Wali Karzai was accused of insulting Islam during a public speech.
Legal Action:
Religious leaders called for prosecution.
The case sparked national debate on freedom of expression versus religious respect.
Outcome:
Case dropped due to political influence.
However, raised awareness of blasphemy risks for public figures.
⚖️ Case 3: Sentencing for Quran Desecration (Kandahar, 2014)
Facts:
A man was arrested after being caught burning a Quran in public.
Trial and Judgment:
Tried under Penal Code provisions criminalizing insult to Islam.
Sentenced to 10 years imprisonment.
Significance:
Affirmed strong state protection of Islamic symbols.
⚖️ Case 4: Blasphemy Accusations Against Female Teacher (Herat, 2017)
Facts:
A female teacher was accused of making statements critical of Islamic dress codes.
Action Taken:
Local community pressured authorities.
Teacher was arrested and charged with blasphemy.
Outcome:
Detained for several months.
Case ended in acquittal after intervention by human rights groups.
⚖️ Case 5: Blasphemy-Related Violence and Informal Punishments (Various Provinces)
Context:
Several cases exist where individuals accused of blasphemy faced mob violence or extrajudicial killings, especially in rural areas.
Example:
In 2018, a man accused of insulting Islam was lynched by villagers.
Local jirgas ordered punishments outside formal legal processes.
Legal Concern:
Shows the danger of blasphemy accusations in fueling vigilante justice.
⚖️ Case 6: Taliban-Era Enforcement of Blasphemy Laws (1996-2001 and Post-2021)
Facts:
During Taliban rule, blasphemy was punishable by harsh measures including execution, imprisonment, and corporal punishment.
Reported Cases:
Public executions for blasphemy.
Harsh punishments for alleged blasphemers including women accused of insulting Islam.
Significance:
Under Taliban rule, blasphemy laws are enforced severely, with limited due process.
5. Challenges in Blasphemy Prosecutions
Ambiguity in Legal Definitions:
The Penal Code lacks clear definitions, leading to broad interpretation.
Influence of Religious Leaders:
Clerics often sway prosecution and punishment.
Vigilante Justice:
Accusations sometimes lead to extrajudicial killings.
Suppression of Free Speech:
Blasphemy laws are sometimes used to silence dissent or minority views.
International Criticism:
Afghan blasphemy laws conflict with international human rights norms on freedom of religion and expression.
6. Conclusion
Blasphemy remains a serious criminal offense in Afghanistan, prosecuted both under formal law and customary or religious codes. Punishments range from imprisonment to death, especially in conservative or Taliban-controlled areas. Balancing religious sensitivities with human rights remains a key legal and societal challenge.

comments