Prosecution Of Environmental Crimes: Pollution, Illegal Logging And Mining
π± Prosecution of Environmental Crimes in Nepal: Pollution, Illegal Logging, and Mining
1. Legal Framework in Nepal
Nepal has developed a robust legal framework to address environmental crimes. Key laws include:
Constitution of Nepal (2015) β Article 30 guarantees the right to a clean and healthy environment.
Environment Protection Act, 2019 (EPA) β regulates pollution, waste management, and environmental impact assessments (EIA).
Forest Act, 2019 β prohibits illegal logging, encroachment, and forest resource exploitation.
Mines and Minerals Act, 1985 (Amended) β controls mining activities and prevents unauthorized extraction.
National Parks and Wildlife Conservation Act, 1973 β criminalizes illegal mining and logging in protected areas.
Penalties include imprisonment, fines, confiscation of equipment, and revocation of licenses.
2. Key Environmental Crimes
Pollution: Air, water, and soil pollution by industries, vehicles, or urban waste.
Illegal Logging: Unauthorized felling of trees in protected areas or community forests.
Illegal Mining: Extraction of minerals, sand, and gravel without legal authorization.
3. Landmark Cases in Nepal
Case 1: Prakash Mani Sharma v. Government of Nepal (2001, Supreme Court)
Issue: Industrial pollution in Kathmandu Valley and Bagmati River.
Facts: NGO βPro Publicβ filed a public interest litigation (PIL) demanding action against polluting industries.
Decision:
Ordered closure of industries failing to install pollution control equipment.
Directed the government to establish a pollution monitoring mechanism.
Significance:
Recognized environmental pollution as a criminally actionable offense.
Introduced the polluter pays principle in Nepalese law.
Case 2: Vehicle Emission Case (2003, Supreme Court)
Issue: Air pollution due to high-emission vehicles.
Facts: Petitioner requested enforcement of emission standards in Kathmandu.
Decision:
Ban on vehicles older than 20 years and two-stroke engines.
Mandatory emission testing before vehicle renewal.
Significance:
Established air pollution as a criminally punishable act.
Strengthened regulatory accountability.
Case 3: Godavari Marble Mining Case (2002, Supreme Court)
Issue: Illegal marble mining causing deforestation and dust pollution.
Facts: Marble industry operated without EIA, harming the local ecosystem.
Decision:
Suspended mining operations until EIA compliance.
Reinforced criminal liability for environmental violations.
Significance:
Set precedent for judicial control of mining operations.
Reinforced the importance of environmental clearance.
Case 4: Bagmati River Encroachment Case (Bharat Mani Jangam, 2004, Supreme Court)
Issue: Illegal dumping and encroachment along the Bagmati River.
Facts: The petitioner sought removal of waste and illegal settlements affecting water quality.
Decision:
Declared encroachment and pollution as environmental crimes and public nuisances.
Ordered removal of encroachments and prosecution of polluters.
Significance:
Linked urban environmental governance to criminal liability.
Case 5: Chitwan Community Forest Logging Case (District Forest Office, 2011)
Issue: Illegal logging in community forest.
Facts: Contractors illegally cut Sal trees in protected community forest areas.
Decision:
Convictions under Forest Act, 2019.
Confiscation of timber, vehicles, and tools.
Significance:
Highlighted strict criminal liability for illegal logging.
Confirmed community responsibility to prevent forest crimes.
Case 6: Kathmandu Brick Kiln Pollution Case (2015, Supreme Court)
Issue: Air pollution caused by brick kilns.
Facts: Brick kilns operating with old technology emitted heavy smoke, affecting nearby communities.
Decision:
Closed non-compliant kilns.
Ordered adoption of environmentally friendly zigzag kilns.
Significance:
Demonstrated integration of technology compliance into criminal liability.
Linked environmental harm to public health protection.
Case 7: Chitwan National Park Illegal Mining Case (2018)
Issue: Sand and gravel extraction inside protected area.
Facts: Contractors illegally mined riverbeds within park boundaries.
Decision:
Convicted under National Parks and Wildlife Conservation Act.
Imprisonment and ecological restoration orders issued.
Significance:
Strengthened criminal enforcement in protected areas.
Introduced restorative justice for environmental crimes.
Case 8: Pro Public v. Kathmandu Valley Development Authority (2017)
Issue: Mismanagement of Sisdol landfill causing pollution.
Facts: Leachate contaminated nearby communities.
Decision:
Authority held criminally negligent.
Ordered compensation to affected residents and prosecution of responsible officials.
Significance:
Recognized administrative negligence as criminal liability in environmental harm.
4. Observations
Nepalese courts increasingly treat environmental harm as criminal acts, not just civil wrongs.
Common principles applied:
Polluter pays principle
Precautionary principle
Judicial supervision over EIA compliance
Sentences include imprisonment, fines, and confiscation of property.
Restorative justice is emerging in cases like illegal mining and river pollution.
Courts emphasize state and community accountability in preventing environmental crimes.
5. Summary Table
| Case | Year | Crime Type | Court Decision | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prakash Mani Sharma | 2001 | Industrial Pollution | Closure of industries, monitoring | Pollution as criminal offense |
| Vehicle Emission Case | 2003 | Air Pollution | Ban old vehicles, emission testing | Air pollution liability |
| Godavari Marble | 2002 | Mining | Suspension, EIA compliance | Mining requires legal clearance |
| Bagmati River Encroachment | 2004 | Pollution & Encroachment | Removal, prosecution | Urban environmental governance |
| Chitwan Community Forest | 2011 | Illegal Logging | Convictions, confiscation | Forest crime liability |
| Brick Kiln | 2015 | Industrial Air Pollution | Closure, tech compliance | Tech standards + public health |
| Chitwan National Park | 2018 | Illegal Mining | Imprisonment, restoration | Protected area enforcement |
| Pro Public v. KVDA | 2017 | Waste Management | Compensation, prosecution | Administrative liability |
6. Conclusion
Nepalese law criminalizes environmental harm, including pollution, illegal logging, and mining.
Courts have progressively used constitutional rights, statutory law, and judicial principles to hold both private actors and government bodies accountable.
Effective prosecution combines criminal penalties, regulatory enforcement, and restorative justice to prevent long-term environmental damage.
RELATED Blog
0 comments