Case Law On Victim Compensation Programs
📌 Victim Compensation Programs in India: Legal Context
Victim compensation programs aim to provide financial assistance and rehabilitation to victims of crimes, especially when the victims suffer physical, emotional, or financial harm.
These programs are enshrined in the Criminal Procedure Code (Sections 357, 357A), the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, the Motor Vehicles Act, and various State Victim Compensation Schemes.
The judiciary plays a proactive role in enforcing victim compensation and setting standards for timely relief.
🏛️ Key Judicial Precedents on Victim Compensation
1. Laxmi v. Union of India, (2014) 4 SCC 427
Facts:
The petition was filed following the Delhi gang-rape case (2012), demanding compensation and victim protection.
It sought better legal and medical support for victims of sexual violence.
Supreme Court Ruling:
The Court issued directions to the Centre and States for implementing victim compensation schemes.
Highlighted that compensation is not a bounty but a right under Article 21 (Right to Life and Dignity).
Directed the establishment of fast-track courts, trauma counseling, and protective mechanisms for victims.
Advocated for adequate and timely compensation irrespective of the outcome of the trial.
Significance:
Landmark judgment emphasizing victim-centric justice.
Set a precedent for holistic victim rehabilitation and compensation.
2. State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh, AIR 1996 SC 1393
Facts:
A victim’s family was seeking compensation following the brutal killing of a girl.
Supreme Court Holding:
The Court held that the State is liable to compensate victims or their families for failure to provide adequate protection.
Compensation is a measure of social justice and the State’s duty.
The amount of compensation should be fair, reasonable, and timely.
Importance:
Early recognition of State’s constitutional obligation to compensate victims for lapses in law enforcement.
3. D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal, AIR 1997 SC 610
Facts:
The case dealt with custodial deaths and police excesses.
Supreme Court Directions:
The Court mandated compensation to victims or their families in cases of police brutality.
Emphasized that State must ensure compensation without requiring the victim to initiate civil proceedings.
Takeaway:
Cemented the principle of State accountability in custodial violence.
Introduced procedural safeguards to ensure victim protection and relief.
4. Union of India v. G. Ganayutham, AIR 1997 SC 1125
Facts:
The case focused on the scope of compensation under Motor Vehicles Act for accident victims.
Supreme Court Ruling:
The Court held that compensation must be awarded even if no fault is found on the driver.
The purpose of compensation is social welfare and relief to victims.
Stressed that compensation should be timely, just, and adequate.
Significance:
Expanded the scope of victim compensation beyond fault-based liability.
5. Nilabati Behera v. State of Orissa, AIR 1993 SC 1960
Facts:
This case involved custodial death and demanded compensation to victim’s family.
Supreme Court Holding:
The Court awarded compensation for violation of fundamental rights, especially the right to life under Article 21.
Emphasized compensation as a remedy for State violation.
The judgment highlighted the need for compensation irrespective of criminal prosecution outcomes.
Impact:
Important in establishing compensation as a fundamental right remedy.
6. National Legal Services Authority (NALSA) v. Union of India, (2014) 5 SCC 438
Facts:
The case dealt with rights of transgender persons, including protection against violence.
Court’s Observation:
Recognized that victims from marginalized communities require special compensation and rehabilitation.
Directed states to design victim compensation schemes inclusive of all vulnerable groups.
Significance:
Extended the victim compensation framework to disadvantaged and marginalized groups.
⚖️ Summary of Principles from Case Law on Victim Compensation
| Principle | Explanation | Case Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Right to Compensation as part of Right to Life | Compensation is a constitutional right under Article 21. | Laxmi v. Union of India, Nilabati Behera |
| State Liability for Failure to Protect | State must compensate victims for lapses in law enforcement. | Gurmit Singh, D.K. Basu |
| Timely and Adequate Relief | Compensation must be prompt and sufficient. | Union of India v. Ganayutham |
| Compensation beyond Fault | Liability to compensate is not always fault-based. | Ganayutham |
| Inclusive Compensation Schemes | Must cover all vulnerable groups, including marginalized communities. | NALSA v. UOI |
📌 Additional Notes
Section 357 and 357A of CrPC mandate courts to order compensation and States to formulate schemes.
The Victim Compensation Scheme, 2018 (by the Central Government) operationalizes these judgments.
Courts often act suo moto to direct compensation in serious crimes like sexual assault, custodial deaths, and acid attacks.
RELATED Blog
0 comments