Uncrc And Child Protection Prosecutions In Bangladesh
UNCRC and Child Protection in Bangladesh
The UNCRC (ratified by Bangladesh in 1990) is a cornerstone for child rights protection. Key principles include:
Right to Protection from Abuse (Article 19, 34, 35)
Right to Education and Development (Articles 28, 29)
Right to Participation (Article 12)
Right to Special Care in Justice System (Articles 37, 40)
Domestic Legal Framework:
Children Act 2013: Primary law for child protection, including sexual abuse, trafficking, and exploitation.
Penal Code, 1860: Sections on rape, abduction, sexual harassment, and cruelty.
Juvenile Justice System: Special courts for children in conflict with law.
Objective: Ensure compliance with UNCRC standards, including protection from harm and fair trial rights for children.
Key Case Laws on Child Protection Prosecutions
1. BLAST v. Bangladesh (2003) – Child Sexual Abuse Reporting
Facts:
PIL filed to improve reporting and prosecution of child sexual abuse.
Highlighted poor enforcement of Children Act 1974 (now 2013) and lack of child-friendly procedures.
Court Findings:
High Court directed government to establish special child protection units and child-friendly court procedures.
Emphasized alignment with UNCRC Articles 19 and 34.
Significance:
Recognized state obligation to protect children from sexual abuse.
Influenced creation of Child Protection Committees and Special Tribunals.
2. State v. Nurul Islam (2007) – Rape of Minor Child
Facts:
Accused charged with rape of a 10-year-old girl under Sections 376 and 9 of the Children Act 1974.
Court Findings:
Court emphasized special consideration for child victims, including testimony via video link.
Conviction upheld with maximum sentence, highlighting severity of offense.
Significance:
Courts started incorporating child-friendly procedures and stringent punishment to deter abuse.
Reflected UNCRC principle of best interests of the child (Article 3).
3. TIB v. Government (2010) – Child Trafficking
Facts:
PIL challenged ineffective prosecution of child trafficking under Penal Code and Children Act.
Court Findings:
High Court directed law enforcement to proactively investigate child trafficking and coordinate with NGOs.
Courts emphasized UNCRC Article 35 (prevention of abduction, sale, or trafficking).
Significance:
Strengthened government accountability in child trafficking cases.
Encouraged special prosecution measures for child victims.
4. State v. Farhana Akter (2015) – Sexual Exploitation of a Minor
Facts:
Case involved sexual exploitation and pornography involving a 12-year-old girl.
Court Findings:
Court applied Children Act 2013 and penal provisions for pornography and sexual abuse.
Ordered rehabilitation of the victim along with criminal punishment of perpetrators.
Explicitly referred to UNCRC Article 34 (protection from sexual exploitation).
Significance:
Courts incorporated rehabilitation and counseling as part of justice, aligning with UNCRC.
Highlighted dual focus on punishment and protection.
5. BLAST v. Government (2018) – Juvenile Justice and Child Witnesses
Facts:
PIL regarding use of children as witnesses in criminal trials.
Children were intimidated and not given adequate protection during proceedings.
Court Findings:
Court mandated special procedures for child witnesses, including separate waiting areas, in-camera trials, and recording testimony via video.
Cited UNCRC Articles 12 and 40, emphasizing participation and protection of children in judicial proceedings.
Significance:
Strengthened child-friendly justice measures.
Ensured children’s voices are heard safely while protecting their rights.
Summary Table
| Case | Issue | Court Finding | UNCRC Principle Applied |
|---|---|---|---|
| BLAST v. Bangladesh (2003) | Child sexual abuse reporting | Directed creation of child protection units | Articles 19 & 34 |
| State v. Nurul Islam (2007) | Rape of minor | Conviction upheld, child-friendly testimony | Article 3 |
| TIB v. Government (2010) | Child trafficking | Directed proactive investigation | Article 35 |
| State v. Farhana Akter (2015) | Sexual exploitation & pornography | Punishment + rehabilitation | Article 34 |
| BLAST v. Government (2018) | Child witnesses in trial | Child-friendly procedures mandated | Articles 12 & 40 |
Key Takeaways
Bangladesh courts increasingly incorporate UNCRC standards in child protection cases.
Children Act 2013 is aligned with UNCRC, but effective implementation is key.
Courts emphasize protection, rehabilitation, and best interests of the child alongside criminal prosecution.
Child-friendly procedures (video testimony, in-camera trials) are now part of judicial practice.
Public Interest Litigations (PILs) by organizations like BLAST have been critical in strengthening child protection mechanisms.
RELATED Blog
comments